Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Covid and the Regulatory State Covid and the Regulatory State

05-22-2020 , 03:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bacalaopeace
When the data is in and it is clear that more than half of the deaths occurred in old folks homes, perhaps people will begin to realize that the privatization/outsourcing/deregulation paradigm resulted in increased mortality.
And such a "realization" may be valid, maybe not.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-22-2020 , 06:32 AM
Pretty clearly true in Europe. In Spain more than half of deaths are in residence homes in the periphery of Madrid.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-22-2020 , 06:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bacalaopeace
When the data is in and it is clear that more than half of the deaths occurred in old folks homes, perhaps people will begin to realize that the privatization/outsourcing/deregulation paradigm resulted in increased mortality.
What does one have to do with the other?

The whole reason this thing spun out of control was the incompetence and corruption of government agencies.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-22-2020 , 07:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
What does one have to do with the other?

The whole reason this thing spun out of control was the incompetence and corruption of government agencies, including the POTUS.
Augmented your post.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-22-2020 , 08:26 AM
I thought that was implied but good idea, I’m sure it will prevent some people from spazzing out.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-22-2020 , 08:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
I thought that was implied but good idea, I’m sure it will prevent some people from spazzing out.
True. If you don't criticize Trump in at least half your posts, you are branded a "Trump supporter" by many around here.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-22-2020 , 02:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
What does one have to do with the other?

The whole reason this thing spun out of control was the incompetence and corruption of government agencies.
Systematic minimal staffing of residence homes, degraded public health infrastructure, etc. all has lead to greatly increased mortality and lack of preparedeness.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-22-2020 , 02:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
Didn't Germany already run this experiment?
How did it turn out for their socialist utopia part?
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-22-2020 , 09:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bacalaopeace
Systematic minimal staffing of residence homes, degraded public health infrastructure, etc. all has lead to greatly increased mortality and lack of preparedeness.
You seem to be describing State run institutions with words like "systematic" and "public." So I still don't see where privatization and deregulation comes in to play here. Maybe if you had infection rates in public vs private nursing homes you could make a case either way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by campfirewest
How did it turn out for their socialist utopia part?
Turns out a terrible, immoral plan on paper is actually a full blown **** show in practice.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-30-2020 , 09:23 PM
The Atlantic has an interesting interview about this with Tyler Cowen:

Quote:
Friedersdorf: What’s more important in a political leader: someone who’ll push to formally get rid of flawed rules and regulations, or someone who is adept at navigating the regulatory state as it exists when they are elected?

Cowen: I don’t see a general rule; this one is going to depend on context. I certainly would not assume that the former is more effective. For a pandemic, it can be hard to know in advance exactly which rules and regulations to repeal; rather, a speedy and flexible response is at a premium. You do want a leader who understands the detailed workings of government, and the countries with better response performance usually have had that.
Quote:
Friedersdorf: To reform the regulatory state, should we be thinking in terms of big versus small? Powerful versus weak? Smart versus dumb? Competent versus incompetent? Flexible versus inflexible? Some other paradigm? What particular steps should be taken to improve the performance of the regulatory state?

Cowen: So much needs to be done. First, we need far more data on the scope of regulation, what it does and doesn’t do, and its costs. Second, the possibility of excess regulation needs to become a political issue once again, as it was right before the time of airline deregulation. Third, America needs to be far more open to learning lessons from other countries. “Smart versus dumb” is the best framing of the ones you list. And we should not be reluctant to admit and indeed emphasize that some areas, such as carbon emissions, require much more regulation. That said, when it comes to green energy, some doses of deregulation could help as well—right now it is very difficult in many communities to build a wind farm, even though that is a very green form of energy.
Quote:
Friedersdorf: If political leaders and bureaucrats took your critique to heart and started making changes, what would we look for as markers of success, and what would signal that they were going too far and overcorrecting?

Cowen: An obsession with data and with learning from other countries do not themselves constitute success. Still, they are very good starting points to look for. Another simple sign is when American institutions dealing with COVID-19 testing and PPE supply report that the government is a greater aid than hindrance. We are not there yet. As for a sign that we have gone too far, one would be if we distribute a doubtful vaccine for reasons of political expediency without sufficient testing and study.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-31-2020 , 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Most of the regulatory roadblocks can be bypassed or fast-tracked in an emergency situation. You don't have to abolish or change the regulations do you?

Any failure to do that is a political failure isn't it? If it isn't then it's another example of the disaster of the USA constitutional system .
Typically, there are rules for when a regulatory agency changes how it regulates, which includes a clock of sorts, for public comments, among other things. When it comes to health and safety regulations, it's a lot more rules, and lot more time consuming. Look at what Boeing is going through with its 737. The rules are built to avoid as much arbitrariness as possible, which does not allow a great amount of flexibility. Loops holes/bypasses breed corruption. Our system is one that forces the regulatory agencies to be very specific in how they regulate, which is the correct way to do it. More flexibility is dangerous, which is why the FAA got heat for the flexibility it allowed Boeing during the initial certification process for the plane.

and I just saw this, but it's spot on, IMO:

Quote:
Cowen: An obsession with data and with learning from other countries do not themselves constitute success. Still, they are very good starting points to look for. Another simple sign is when American institutions dealing with COVID-19 testing and PPE supply report that the government is a greater aid than hindrance. We are not there yet. As for a sign that we have gone too far, one would be if we distribute a doubtful vaccine for reasons of political expediency without sufficient testing and study.

Last edited by itshotinvegas; 05-31-2020 at 10:30 AM.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-31-2020 , 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
I think this is an interesting argument about regulatory failures contributing to the poor response to covid in the US:



See also: this NYT piece. And perhaps also this, on the plausibility of defunding CDC as a factor. I tend to read these in relation to the idea of state capacity libertarianism, fwiw.

Partly I'm interested in this as a challenge to my prior skepticism towards Republican attitudes about regulation. And, to be sure, I think it's probably too easy to fit this into existing beliefs for both liberals and conservatives without actually paying much attention. For example, I don't think the validity of these criticisms should lead me to supporting the rollback of EPA pollution rules. And regulatory problems under a pandemic may be more urgent than in more normal circumstances. But i also don't think (if you're a progressive) that criticisms should be dismissed out of hand just because the larger Republican narrative is flawed.
And this, is your moderator folks
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-31-2020 , 11:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rooooktaker
And this, is your moderator folks
Well Named is one of those rare souls who evaluates policies on a case-by-case basis, rather than viewing everything through a narrow ideological lense.

Which is one reason, in my opinion, he is an excellent mod.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
05-31-2020 , 11:51 PM
#notmymoderator
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
06-01-2020 , 12:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lagtight
Well Named is one of those rare souls who evaluates policies on a case-by-case basis, rather than viewing everything through a narrow ideological lense.

Which is one reason, in my opinion, he is an excellent mod.
Even though he has issued me several warnings, and one actual temp-ban.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
06-05-2020 , 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
#notmymoderator
+1
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
06-07-2020 , 05:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lagtight
True. If you don't criticize Trump in at least half your posts, you are branded a "Trump supporter" by many around here.
In the two presidencies preceding Trump, which both oversaw serious outbreaks, the US was the world's front for fighting epidemics and pandemics on an international scale. The recipe is largely based on a basic recipe that the relevant personnel worked to make happen on the ground in various countries: Generate trust in medical authority, get both citizens and officials people to report correct numbers, get trained personnel on the ground quickly. In the other end you of course have actions taken at home: Monitor travel, inform public and screen travel hubs.

This competence did not magically disappear overnight and is still there. It was simply gagged and hand-cuffed by an administration whose only response to bad news is to lie about them, and has a complete absence of leadership regarding any agenda that isn't about the president himself.

No, the US could not have prevented all COVID deaths. But it could have prevented a lot of them and it could have prevented the lockdown from getting as costly as it has gotten. Instead all response was delayed by a president worried about negative headlines and an enabling administration. It is more than likely that this administration's complete absence of honesty, trustworthiness and integrity will run up to a cost of 100,000+ lives and and many hundreds of billions of dollars.

I've said it before and I will say it again. In crisis there is never a substitute for facts. The world does not care about what someone wants to be true, and when a situation is critical that isn't just a nice saying - it is essential to avoid catastrophe.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
06-07-2020 , 08:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tame_deuces
In the two presidencies preceding Trump, which both oversaw serious outbreaks, the US was the world's front for fighting epidemics and pandemics on an international scale. The recipe is largely based on a basic recipe that the relevant personnel worked to make happen on the ground in various countries: Generate trust in medical authority, get both citizens and officials people to report correct numbers, get trained personnel on the ground quickly. In the other end you of course have actions taken at home: Monitor travel, inform public and screen travel hubs.

This competence did not magically disappear overnight and is still there. It was simply gagged and hand-cuffed by an administration whose only response to bad news is to lie about them, and has a complete absence of leadership regarding any agenda that isn't about the president himself.

No, the US could not have prevented all COVID deaths. But it could have prevented a lot of them and it could have prevented the lockdown from getting as costly as it has gotten. Instead all response was delayed by a president worried about negative headlines and an enabling administration. It is more than likely that this administration's complete absence of honesty, trustworthiness and integrity will run up to a cost of 100,000+ lives and and many hundreds of billions of dollars.

I've said it before and I will say it again. In crisis there is never a substitute for facts. The world does not care about what someone wants to be true, and when a situation is critical that isn't just a nice saying - it is essential to avoid catastrophe.
This just in, governments waste money and kill people.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
06-07-2020 , 08:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tame_deuces
In the two presidencies preceding Trump, which both oversaw serious outbreaks, the US was the world's front for fighting epidemics and pandemics on an international scale. The recipe is largely based on a basic recipe that the relevant personnel worked to make happen on the ground in various countries: Generate trust in medical authority, get both citizens and officials people to report correct numbers, get trained personnel on the ground quickly. In the other end you of course have actions taken at home: Monitor travel, inform public and screen travel hubs.

This competence did not magically disappear overnight and is still there. It was simply gagged and hand-cuffed by an administration whose only response to bad news is to lie about them, and has a complete absence of leadership regarding any agenda that isn't about the president himself.

No, the US could not have prevented all COVID deaths. But it could have prevented a lot of them and it could have prevented the lockdown from getting as costly as it has gotten. Instead all response was delayed by a president worried about negative headlines and an enabling administration. It is more than likely that this administration's complete absence of honesty, trustworthiness and integrity will run up to a cost of 100,000+ lives and and many hundreds of billions of dollars.

I've said it before and I will say it again. In crisis there is never a substitute for facts. The world does not care about what someone wants to be true, and when a situation is critical that isn't just a nice saying - it is essential to avoid catastrophe.
I agree with you.

I also agree with ME.

My post and your response to it are both valid.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
06-07-2020 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
This just in, governments waste money and kill people.
Catchy, you should make some hashtags.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote
06-10-2020 , 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckproof
This just in, governments waste money and kill people.
Always have and always will.
Covid and the Regulatory State Quote

      
m