I see that on various places on the internet (and on this forum occassionally, from people who have not read the sticky) Sweden is used as an example to tout theories that downplay the severity of the virus, used as an example of a country that didn't treat the virus as serious as others.
This is a false and misleading claim. While it is correct that Sweden took an approach gambling on herd immunity, it was not done without taking several powerful and sweeping measures, such as:
- Made calling in sick from work available without loss of pay.
- Removed upper limit on days from calling in sick.
- Issued social distancing guidelines
- Issued recommendations to work at home
- Issued personal hygiene recommendations
- Made large social gatherings forbidden
- Made isolation and quarantine requirements from doctors mandatory with legal punishment for people who do not comply
- Made a new crisis governship act into law, giving the cabinet greatly expanded powers to handle the crisis
- Issued various workplace laws to reduce spread of virus
Nor have they in any way or form downplayed the severity of the virus or issued statements that treat the virus as a disease people should not take seriously. A key reason that they in some instances used
recommendation over regulation is that they knew from data that the Swedish populace as a whole has a high level of trust in health authorities and would follow such recommendations.
People interested can check out their efforts here:
https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/...trol/covid-19/