Yeah like I said, straight up trolling. Thanks for confirming.

Oh did you think you said something with responding to?


lolololol

burn this thread to the ground

No. I just made a factual statement that you were trolling. That's all. I didn't want or expect any response.

Sharing a blog post for others to read is not trolling. Laughing at you isn't either, but I understand why you might think so.

Posting something purely to get a reaction or to tick people off (in your own words), is the definition of trolling.

You might think it's funny but it is against forum rules.

Ignoring the policy claims in the article, which is basically an exercise in begging the question, it's unarguably true that the death rate of white Americans from Covid was lower than any other ethnicity except Asian in America for the first 6-9 months of the pandemic and the death rate among black Americans was highest, particularly in the first 3 months when it was 2-3x higher than any other ethnicity.

Taking cumulative numbers since the start of the pandemic the highest death rate is among indigenous peoples and white/black and essentially the same now, with the death rate for white people having gradually caught up to the level of black people over the last 18 months.

With this being the case then far from countering the point, the age/racial demographics you mention actually provide additional evidence that Covid was disproportionally impacting black Americans early in the pandemic if so many more were dying despite generally being a younger population.

I didn't say that was the only reason I was posting it. You added that part. I said is a nice little bonus.

And boy was I right.

For reference I even listed those two reasons right in my post, but you still somehow think I said it was the only reason.

The article was stupid as I said and not even worth commenting on. My reaction was to you using it to troll which you admitted in your own words, which you just repeated. Lol

Willd, a good and factual reply to Luc's post. Thx

I didn't use it to troll. I never said that word. I posted it because it was fascinating, and because it would make conspiracy theorists mad. As I said. You can call partially posting it to make conspiracy theorists mad trolling if you want, but like my post clearly says, the main reason I posted it was because I thought it was fascinating. The making mad part was a parenthetical addition for comedic effect. But I am actually entertained by it. So please, continue.

Forgot to swing back and pick this one up.

Data corrected for age (and other factors) still confirms much higher excess death rate for republicans over democrats after vaccine became available.

Source: Wallace J, Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Schwartz JL. Excess Death Rates for Republican and Democratic Registered Voters in Florida and Ohio During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(9):916–923. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1154

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2807617

Some great news for immuno-compromised individuals. A monoclonal antibody infusion has been given EUA for use as an infection prophylactic.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infecti...covid19/109336

This is life changing news for many people.

FDA ordered to stop lying about Ivermectin.

Ivermectin should be a medication that cure Covid despite being a medication to fight
Parasites.
Strange concept to me shrug.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/art...-tablet#dosage

Btw people are a fraud of vaccination and get for ivermectin that tells you this can actually occur !

Lol

Snopes will help you out on that one.

just so i'm clear you're concerned about people with HIV and people breastfeeding taking Ivermectin but you have zero concerns about myocarditis and pericarditis from the covid vaccine because??????

honest question.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...ocarditis.html

FALSE because it was a "survey" not a "study"

fact checkers ftw

That is not what it said. It says it was exempt from FOIA because it was inter-department communications and communications with other agencies.

It wasn't anything at all to do with a study . So yes, the claim that they reacted an entire study is false.

Not sure where you came up with it was a survey. (Edit: oh I see you read far enough to find something you thought supported your idea and stopped reading. You should have read the whole thing. Your confirmation bias is showing - the redacted pages were not the survey)

You can read it yourself here:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cd...arditis-study/

When you do, you will find links to extensive evidence demonstrating exactly the opposite of what the made up claim is trying to insinuate. In fact, the CDC has released nearly a dozen studies detailing the relationship between COVID vaccinations and myocarditis. They aren't trying to hide anything.

No Im saying ivermectin, by their own words, have many more risk to a lot of different peoples .

Risk of ivermectin exist too for a much larger portion of the population for lot of different side effects some mild, other serious !
So why isn’t that a concern ???

Anyway , That’s what it is when you take any kind of medication regardless being vaccine , ivermectin or aspirins .
Risks always exist even if they are extremely minimal like we speak here about myocarditis from vaccine .
I see no one saying we should ban aspirin ?

But not im not concern with myocarditis vs the amount of billions of people that didn’t had any and those rare that happened was easily taken care at the hospital .
https://medicine.yale.edu/news-artic...d-19-vaccines/

What it says is myocarditis risk is higher when you aren’t vaccinated …..
And when I hear kids shouldn’t be vaccinated because they have less then 1% of dying , well having problems of myocarditis from vaccine was even lower ….


It’s a non issue for me when speak risk of like 1 in the tens of thousands!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...(Figure%201%20).

your post (besides the quotes you insert) is very hard to read. that said, do these side effects really worry you? which one specifically has you up at night? The skin rash? I'm not even pro-Ivermectin.




trouble breathing
swelling of your throat or tongue
skin rash
If you develop these symptoms, call 911 or go to the nearest emergency room.

Don’t take this drug again if you’ve ever had an allergic reaction to it. Taking it again could be fatal (cause death).

Warnings for people with certain health conditions

For people with asthma: This drug may make your asthma worse. Ask your doctor if this drug is safe for you.

For people with liver problems: If you have liver problems or a history of liver issues, this drug may cause more harm to your liver. Also, you may not be able to process this drug well. This may increase the levels of the drug in your body and cause more side effects. Ask your doctor if this drug is safe for you.

For people with seizures: This drug may cause seizures. Ask your doctor if this drug is safe for you.

For people with HIV: If you have HIV or a condition where your immune system doesn’t work as well as it should, one dose of this drug may not be enough to treat your parasitic infection. You may need several treatments with this drug.

Warnings for other groups

For pregnant people: Talk with your doctor if you’re pregnant or planning to become pregnant. This drug should only be used if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk.

Research in animals has shown adverse effects to the fetus when the mother takes the drug. There haven’t been enough studies in humans to be certain how the drug might affect the fetus.

If you become pregnant while taking this drug, call your doctor right away.

For people who are breastfeeding: Ivermectin passes into breast milk and may cause side effects in a breastfed child. Talk with your doctor if you breastfeed your child. You may need to decide whether to stop breastfeeding or stop taking this medication.

For seniors: Your liver may not work as well as it used to. This can cause your body to process drugs more slowly. As a result, more of this drug can stay in your body for a longer time. This raises your risk of side effects.

For children: It hasn’t been established if this drug is safe and effective in children who weigh less than 33 pounds (15 kilograms)

Ok source is kinda bad (daily mail) but the content is sound, and can be verified at source.

Looks like german top scientific health body (robert kock institute) in late 2020 wrote reports about lockdowns, and how they would cause more damage than covid (even under optimistic assumptions of efficacy of lockdown to reduce cases a lot), and that they wrote that even ffp2 masks had unproven effect on case mitigation, yet german politicians redacted those findings, hid them from the public, it took more than 2 years in a FOIA-equivalent legal battle to be able to access the unredacted reports.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ents-show.html

So during an emergency you lie about "science", censor opposite voices, claim a fake science (against the explicit, written consensus of your scientifical experts) as the legal basis to justify historically unprecedented compressions of fundamental constitutional rights, and you do all that because you think that's politically convenient for you, what should be the penalty of doing that? i think it can be framed as a crime against humanity very clearly.

This was our generation holocaust (mass violation of basic human rights of the population, with no historical precedent at that scale in peacetime) and we must act accordingly, punishing every single actor who has responsibilities and creating the conditions for this to never happen again at any cost.

We must amend constitutions removing the possibility of those constitutional rights limitations *with no exception*, not war, not a health crisis, nothing, we now know they will abuse those exceptions to extent that we thought were inimaginabile, and no crisis is as dangerous as the forfeiture of basic constitutional rights for the whole population.

Or, we could admit that the wearing a mask in public or requiring a vaccination to return to the workforce during a pandemic were small sacrifices. Such acts are for the public good and are the duties of citizenship of a civilized society and that listening to the hyperbolic claims that it is our generations holocaust is pure nonsense.

Also, dying as a dumb antivaxxer is pretty high on my list of things not to do.