Chain of possession of data should actually be made extremely clear and easy to find in any peer reviewed scientific research. There is a Materials and Methods section where you are required to explicitly spell it out, or if it is not the first time this data has been used (as is often the case) cite another paper where it is explicitly spelled out.

The fact one has to go on a treasure hunt to try to find these details again points to how compromised this entire process is. IMO no peer reviewed paper should be making it into Nature where we cant even follow the chain of data collection. In the case where there are multiple groups working together you will often see a flowchart breaking down who did what.

Yet in this case it is not clear at all who did what, and no one seems to care. So here we are.

We used the most robust data available even if problematic, is not as flawed as we purposefully just made up the data that is the case with numerous Ivermectin studies.

Its a weird what aboutism argument.

Ivermectin studies might have been total and utter proven garbage, but what about those origin studies??

One of the research papers Brett Weinstein was pointing to as evidence of Ivermectin's effectiveness in 2020 (I forget which one, somewhere in South America) he asked them to open their books and show him (and by extension the rest of the world) their data so it could be audited. They they basically told him to **** off. And even he admitted this was reason to completely discount their research.

China's approach from Day 1 when asked to open their books has been more or less "**** off" and the data they provide is being published in Nature and Science and featured in BBC and WaPo articles to make grand claims about the origin of the virus, without a single cause for concern. It has become truth. He who controls the present controls the past.

It really is more apples to apples than you would like to admit.

--Again, all else being equal China would probably prefer the "truth" was decided Covid came from an American bioweapons lab or Italy. I doubt they are the ones shaping our narrative. They have their own narrative they are shaping. But I think our Establishment is cynically using flawed data they provide to shape the narrative our narrative wants, and all else being equal they can live with this.

If they only looked at your expert takes, posted on some random poker forum. Well, their loss, amirite?

Yeah, the establishment meets every Tuesday, discussing ways to make the live of bottom feeders harder. Because that's who they are most afraid from, that one superintelligent guy who posts on a random forum.

It has not become truth, that is just hyperbolic narrative from the talking heads to whom you concede the ability to determine all your narratives.

You really are an excellent narrative repeater bot.

But again this all a weird what aboutism, we know conclusively the data in numerous Ivermectin studies was bad, and in a weird attempt to obfuscate that badness you are all about what about the origin science?

Weird.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62548336

Must be dismissed because johnny bananas as reported in UK intel rag the Guardian (see Mark Curtis report how guardian was co-opted post Assange btw).

News crawlers seem to omit an interesting fact discovered from internal Pfizer documents recently released:

From feminist author and journalist Dr. Naomi Wolf:
So, CDC/FDA have plausible deniability of any knowledge of adverse pregnancy risks as the miscarriages were obfuscated. I'm guessing emergency immunity will get Pfizer out of any litigation challenges, which is good for them of course. But it would be nice to hear Pfizer's side of the story.

Excellent sleuthing work: also borne out by the fact that 10's of thousands of pregnant mothers miscarried after getting the vaccine. I remember the Today show leading with that.

I assumed the massive worldwide miscarriage problem we've definitely been having was due to bad vape juice, not the COVID vaccine. In hindsight, it's obvious.

You guys all know about this chinese whistle blower, right?
wtf is up with this? I mean this is a bit crazy, dont you think?

She came to America from Hong Kong, is a virologist, worked with the top dog virologists in china, lives in hiding now in the US, only to get banned from twitter? And they let misinformation stand from chinese government accounts? For real? This is ridiculous.




Option one: she is telling the truth
Option two: she is not


I had a chinese roomate at college and she reminds me of him, a bit geeky and dorky but genuine, so I have my soft skills tell me she is not lying.

And why would she be lying? I cant see any reason. Is she a double agent or somehing? That doesnt make any sense either, because she is talking bad about china.



who can illumiate me here?


And why is she not on CNN? She seems to have been on FOX NEWS.
And why did twitter ban her?


She is praising Trump here in this video btw. Why would a chinese whisteblower praise Trump?

Because she wants an audience for her ideologically driven misinformation.

I dont belive this. For a few reasons, she comes across as very honest, and she is from Hong Kong. I had a classmate from Hong Kong, he was as straight as possible. I believe people from Hong Kong are pretty straight and she seems to be very straight. Anyway, why would she want an audience now? It brings her life in danger and she has to live in hiding. China doesnt like deflectors, you know? Thats what doesnt make any sense with your explanation. People dont like to leave their country and people and live their life under a new identidy under a whitness protection programm under constant stress.



Are you saying she is bought by trump? That doesnt make any sense imo.

I see no reason whatsoever to believe you've ever taken a class.

Looks like women in red states need more vaccine access.

Sir, this man had a Chinese roomate, I think we need to take what he says seriously.

He also talks to 2 Americans frequently. He's basically Reuters and Q in one.

I have no clue what this q conspiracy is, I refused to look into this madness.

Seriously you are not as fast as I thought, or you play dumb now.

She gets executed when she steps back on her home land, do you get this? Thats what they do with people talking bad about the gov. Especially top dog scientists, which she is. she worked with chinese first line doctors to solve this siuation until she could not take it anymore.

there is no logical reason why she would tell a lie imo, or is there?

Another proof we are living in a bubble, its a facade of the truth.

That doctor was never invited to CNN BBC etc. only to fox and skynews etc. the right wing channels.

She did publish a scientific paper here with 3 other doctors from Hong Kong. Yes, she is really legit:

"Dr Yan had been working at Hong Kong University’s public health laboratory sciences division, a World Health Organisation infectious diseases research centre, when her boss was asked to investigate the outbreak in Wuhan. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/he...6dec0cb665c970

Paper is here, open source. This really only confirms one thing, that the truth gets burried. And science got corrupted.

https://zenodo.org/record/4028830#.Yv_CIRzP23D

She didn’t publish a scientific paper ie get it through the review process. She released a preprint. Actual reviewed articles show her work to be erroneous so decent news channels don’t have her on. Far right channels do because her discredited work fits their ideology and what they would like to be true.

wrong, I ask you to comprehend this information, especially the first short video:

You won't be able to understand it, but here is the reviewed response to her work an it's highly critical. Why would they lie? How is it possible that they are lying so badly that someone like you, who would struggle in jr high level science classes can see their lies?