Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
Yeah, that post doesn't give a definition at all, it just says that humans have sexual dismorphism and you're ok with someone choosing to switch sides. It should be clear why many people are not ok with switching sides when different rules and benefits are applied to one side.
"Love" isn't easy to define objectively, but "woman" isn't a behavior or feeling. And because love can't be objectively determined, there are no laws or rules based on it. Typically people who get married claim to be in love, but no marriage laws say they must be. Tables in fancy restaurants aren't reserved for people who are in love.
He's just being Uke. He just dishonestly sent you searching for a definition in his post history that doesn't exist. He knows he looks ridiculous but I'm sure in his mind it's justified
Look, gender ideology is the root of all these controversies. Men in womens sports, transitioning kids, the pronoun police including the canadian human rights code, drag queen story hour, men in women's shelters, men in women's prison, etc. At the root of gender ideology is obviously some basic concepts. What is a woman? What is a man? That's 99% of the population across cultures throughout human history. Everyone understood these things. They can't even define what man or woman is now. Ok so there's also other genders. I asked to list and describe 2 additional genders and give a definition. That didn't happen either. I asked a handful of other pro trans agenda crowd and they had nothing either. This is at total, complete, and utter clown show
Now his tactic is to deflect. But Matt Walsh already asked this question. This would be irrelevant to me asking uke except it makes him look even worse. He's seen Walsh aske the question and instead of pumping the brakes and re-evaluating his own position or coming up with an actual answer, he just marches forward like a hypnotized cult member. The fact matt walsh asked the question doesn't change the fact that he or his comrades can't make any sense of the gender ideology they subscribe to. It's a feeble and transparent attempt to deflect. The next move is to keep uking people in the thread while pretending we all can't see the giant shoes and big red nose. It's just an amazing schtick
Bro. What is a woman? You stumped? OK that's embarrassing. How about demonstrating you have a shred of humility and tone down the uke o mania