Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend)

07-21-2020 , 03:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
No idea, and it's totally irrelevant to the point I'm making, which is that you said something, then claimed that you didn't say that thing and that other people were making up quotes from you.
Whoa dude, you do realize goofy was fake quoting MrWookie, right? This is what I mean with your comprehension errors.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 03:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Whoa dude, you do realize goofy was fake quoting MrWookie, right? This is what I mean with your comprehension errors.
I literally posted a screenshot of a post not 5 posts ago where you appeared to be claiming that goofy was fake quoting you.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 03:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I literally posted a screenshot of a post not 5 posts ago where you appeared to be claiming that goofy was fake quoting you.
Read it again. He was fake quoting MrWookie, and MrWookie never said that. MrWookie never asked for a cite for the 60%....he asked me for what the website used, and Goofy replaced that with the 60% fake quote.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 03:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Read it again. He was fake quoting MrWookie, and MrWookie never said that. MrWookie never asked for a cite for the 60%....he asked me for what the website used.
Yes, the web site you had just quoted in giving the 60% figure. I think you might be a bit confused about what was asked by whom and why. I laid out the relevant posts in the screenshots above for you.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 03:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Yes, the web site you had just quoted in giving the 60% figure. I think you might be a bit confused about what was asked by whom and why. I laid out the relevant posts in the 3 screenshots above for you.
I knew you would not admit you were wrong. It's clear the argument is about a question MrWookie asked (him looking for a cite), to which Goofy changed the wording of that question to make it seem like I was lying.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 03:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
Read it again. He was fake quoting MrWookie, and MrWookie never said that. MrWookie never asked for a cite for the 60%....he asked me for what the website used, and Goofy replaced that with the 60% fake quote.
LOL

That's what you thought? You've been going on about a "fake quote" for a dozen posts in multiple threads, and blasting others for their comprehension errors, when you didn't even understand my post correctly?

WOOOOOOO

Dude, I was paraphrasing you. You claimed 60% of Jamals are white, then when Wookie asked about the methodology you claimed the site's data came from the SSA. d2 obviously read this exchange correctly, and you obviously did not.

Oh wow, another brilliant self-own from the ultimate master
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 03:30 AM
I was about to say... I'm even sober today, pretty sure I read that right... had me wondering for a second!
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 03:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
LOL

That's what you thought? You've been going on about a "fake quote" for a dozen posts in multiple threads, and blasting others for their comprehension errors, when you didn't even understand my post correctly?

WOOOOOOO

Dude, I was paraphrasing you. You claimed 60% of Jamals are white, then when Wookie asked about the methodology you claimed the site's data came from the SSA. d2 obviously read this exchange correctly, and you obviously did not.

Oh wow, another brilliant self-own from the ultimate master
Who asked for a cite for the 60%?
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 03:33 AM
No one. Since no one asked, how can I be lying about the SSA cite?
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 03:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tame_deuces
Be more civil people, or give this tangent a rest.

Also, apologies to any Jamals reading this thread.
Ok, we're moving on.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 08:57 PM
I'm cross posting this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
This is a blatant lie. At most, what you've shown is that they are adopting on idea that is in common with critical race theory as well as other people who talk about systemic racism and white privilege in less specific, less academic terms. To try to pass this off as a wholesale adoption of critical race theory in toto is incredibly dishonest. Not that you've even shown that critical race theory is something scary that they shouldn't adopt! You're merely tossing about CRT like it's something everyone should be scared of, mainly because there aren't any CRT scholars around here and nobody really knows what it is.


I'm not going to lie, I get triggered every time MrWookie accuses me of lying, and in the very next sentence he lies about context to support his assertion. This is real gas lighting.

Hint: When someone says they are adopting weight lifting in their fitness routine, it means they are implementing every single weightlifting exercise. (according to MrWookie's rationalization/interpretation)

He has to lie/distort to create conflict.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:02 PM
@mods

Can you just make an IHIV containment thread, and move all his bullshit derails into them? It seems really necessary since he just. cannot. shut. up. about. his. derails. Like,

IHIV: (actual quote) "You are the one who objects to the claim the AP is adopting CRT (which it's clear they are, I'm not even sure why you would argue against that)"
Wookie: (actual quote) "To try to pass this off as a wholesale adoption of critical race theory in toto is incredibly dishonest"
IHIV: (paraphrasing) "LIAR! LIAR! I DIDN'T SAY THAT!"

This forum cannot go on like this, in every single thread. You have to do something.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
@mods

Can you just make an IHIV containment thread, and move all his bullshit derails into them? It seems really necessary since he just. cannot. shut. up. about. his. derails. Like,

IHIV: (actual quote) "You are the one who objects to the claim the AP is adopting CRT (which it's clear they are, I'm not even sure why you would argue against that)"
Wookie: (actual quote) "To try to pass this off as a wholesale adoption of critical race theory in toto is incredibly dishonest"
IHIV: (paraphrasing) "LIAR! LIAR! LIAR! I DIDN'T SAY THAT!"

This forum cannot go on like this, in every single thread. You have to do something.
hahaha goofy trying to cancel me for responding to mrwookie calling me a liar. #facism #toxiccult. It's my fault....right. Hint: I did not say "wholesale adoption".

Last edited by itshotinvegas; 07-21-2020 at 09:09 PM.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:10 PM
Second the motion for "IHIV vs. #toxiccult" thread.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:13 PM
So...we have the resident narcissist call someone a liar, then the other narcissist comes in and blame the person for derailing the thread when that person defends against that allegation, and the narcissist tries to shut down the person who was accused of lying becasue he responded to the allegation in way the narcissist did not like, and the stupid sidekick (i.e. flying monkey) flies in to support the narcissists.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
hahaha goofy trying to cancel me for responding to mrwookie calling me a liar. #facism #toxiccult. It's my fault....right. Hint: I did not say "wholesale adoption".
That's exactly the point. Who ****ing cares? Wookie said "wholesale" and you didn't? So what? That means you need to fly so far off the handle that you blow up the whole thread and make it into "LIAR! LIAR!"? Every adult in this forum can deal with their words being slightly exaggerated - but not you. Grow the **** up, christ.

You can't even let the most minor perceived slight against you go without blowing up the thread. And this happens literally every day.

(also, lol: "#facism")
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Uh, most people who "adopt" "weightlifting" do indeed add many or even most weightlifting exercises to their exercise regimen. If it were only squats they were adding, most normal people would say they're adding squats.

IHIV: I'm learning French!
Somebody: Oh? How are you coming on your fluency?
IHIV: How dare you suggest I'm learning the whole language. I'm only learning French prepositions.
MrWookie:

Me: I'm eating at McDonalds

MrWookie: liar, you are not eating everything from the menu, you should say you are getting Big Mac and fries.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
MrWookie:

Me: I'm eating at McDonalds

MrWookie: liar, you are not eating everything from the menu, you should say you are getting Big Mac and fries.
Absurd. "Adopting" an system of thinking is basically always adopting the whole thing. No one adopts a child's forearm. Picking and choosing one thing off the menu is not a reasonable interpretation of "adopting" an ideology.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
That's exactly the point. Who ****ing cares? Wookie said "wholesale" and you didn't? So what? That means you need to fly so far off the handle that you blow up the whole thread and make it into "LIAR! LIAR!"? Every adult in this forum can deal with their words being slightly exaggerated - but not you. Grow the **** up, christ.

You can't even let the most minor perceived slight against you go without blowing up the thread. And this happens literally every day.

(also, lol: "#facism")

What the **** is your problem? (It's rhetorical, I know what your problem is) I'm responding becasue I did not lie, and he based claim on a lie, not becasue "I'm slighted".

You are making **** up and blaming me when I correct you, and you are making up reasons why I'm correcting you.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:25 PM
If you insist on continuing to argue in circles indefinitely, please do it here. Please try to keep a modicum civility and refrain from name calling.

Thanks
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:27 PM
EADGBE 4 mod!
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
What the **** is your problem? I'm responding becasue I did not lie, and he based his lie on a lie, not becasue "I'm slighted".

Stop ****ing making **** up and blaming me when I correct you, and stop making up reasons I'm correcting you.
Yes, you lied. The Social Security Administration does not keep data on names and races. I know. I've used their data directly from them without needing to rely on 3rd party websites. Furthermore, that's not even how mynamestats.com describes their own methodology! Here's what they actually say:

Quote:
Where does the data come from?

All the data and information displayed on this website is the result of statistical inferences and estimates. No personally identifiable information of any kind is displayed on this website. The primary data source is not available to the public or to any users of the website. The primary data only contains names and partial address information, it is impossible to use this data to identify any single person with any reasonable degree of confidence. Please see our privacy policy for more about the use and protection of data.

As mentioned above the data was compiled from multiple sources mostly from directory listings. Given that the data comes from multiple sources it is difficult to date it precisely. I estimate the date range to be between 2010 and 2012.

The data has been thoroughly cleaned up, duplicate, nonsensical and objectionable entries have been deleted to the greatest extent possible. Even though a significant effort has been made to delete this type of content there still may be certain potentially offensive words that have slipped through the filters. If you come upon such a page, please feel free to let us know and the content will be removed.
That's super shady methodology, that you've foolishly taken as gospel because you think it helps you own the libs.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Absurd. "Adopting" an system of thinking is basically always adopting the whole thing. No one adopts a child's forearm. Picking and choosing one thing off the menu is not a reasonable interpretation of "adopting" an ideology.
I'm adopting socialism/capitalism/communism. It's pretty stupid to think I'm adopting the entirety of something that has several variations.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Yes, you lied. The Social Security Administration does not keep data on names and races. I know. I've used their data directly from them without needing to rely on 3rd party websites. Furthermore, that's not even how mynamestats.com describes their own methodology! Here's what they actually say:



That's super shady methodology, that you've foolishly taken as gospel because you think it helps you own the libs.
The website claimed it uses the SSA data, if you have an issue with them using that in their methodology, talk to them instead of calling me a liar for citing what their website claims.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote
07-21-2020 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
The website claimed it uses the SSA data
Not for the racial data you were using it for. Liar lies again, more news at 11.
The containment thread (aka Hello darkness, my old friend) Quote

      
m