Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Conservatives: What are your principles? Conservatives: What are your principles?

07-31-2019 , 06:54 PM
Look at this dude trying to hang Venezuela around liberals necks and then in the next breath being like "support the war on drugs? Why, I never!"

Lol ok buddy
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
07-31-2019 , 06:56 PM
Locking kids in cages because of some boogeyman threat and wants to act like they're not the bleeding gashes here
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
07-31-2019 , 06:59 PM
You should try to get your emotions in check. You are fabricating positions I don't hold and some topics I've never even commented on and mocking them. Children do that with dolls, you don't need to exercise your imagination here, it's not the place
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
07-31-2019 , 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
You should try to get your emotions in check. You are fabricating positions I don't hold and some topics I've never even commented on and mocking them. Children do that with dolls, you don't need to exercise your imagination here, it's not the place
As long as you understood that I'm mocking you
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
07-31-2019 , 07:25 PM
Scared of their own shadow conservatives that have been for-profit fear mongered to the point of being frightened by their own shadow projecting about masculinity.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
07-31-2019 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
If you think our basic psychological orientation geared towards family structure, children, and differences rooted in our biological composition in reproducing and providing a fresh cup of milk for infants is best described in terms of gender. Not only is it easier to understand, it's the actual basis of any structure/agency. I don't want to get side tracked in mentioning which field has been debunking anothers blank slate (etc) view on gender. The idea that structure/agency is valid but not downstream from gender would definitely be misguided imo
FWIW I personally know noteworthy evolutionary psychologists who are pissed at the way the right has hijacked and twisted their principles and theories to serve malign purposes.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
07-31-2019 , 07:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
Apologies if that was a scattershot post, hard to understand. I think I'm just saying while people within a community perpetuate the results of their own community, the outer world that surrounds it has a strong influence on it, it's origination, and can quite literally strong arm it into stasis unwittingly (unintended consequences like the drug war or the Clinton Crime Bill) or wittingly (institutional, standard, and/or latent racism)

Put maybe even more simply, it can't just be people who care. The system has to care, or no change of significance is possible
absence of responsibility. Another maternal opressor vs oppressed narrative.
Not sure what your point is, but that's reality. There is an extent to which personal responsibility matters, but sometimes it won't matter in the face of actual oppression and/or the lack of will to do enough to inspire, give incentive to, and facilitate the necessary conditions to perpetuate personal responsibility

Inso0 keeps talking about the same diatribe repeatedly and I already told him once he's just stating the obvious and ignoring what you just labeled a "maternal oppressor vs oppressed narrative" and needs to be noted...

One other thing is that perhaps it might be important to understand that in trying to and actually solving a complex social issue like this, the current people getting screwed by it are ****ed. The damage is already done. The action and effort today is really for the people of tomorrow. We screwed the people of today already and real change/improvement for their lives are minimal or non existent
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 06:34 AM
Again there is no group of people who constantly demand a lack of responsibility for their own actions more than movement conservatives.

I became racist because you called other people racist, I voted Trump because liberals attacked Romney, etc. etc.

It is a foundational principle that only the left has agency.

Last edited by FlyWf; 08-01-2019 at 06:47 AM.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 07:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
No, you're probably right. "Zero tolerance" rules are stupid, and taking extenuating circumstances into account is generally how life works.

However, with such huge amounts of money at stake and 100% parental freedom as to where to send their kids to school, I think the risks and consequences aren't as dire as you're imagining.
Fair enough that I don't know how many kids actually get chucked out so it's really a general point about how some types of school appear to be doing a better job than they are. The biggest factor in this regard is usually how they select the student in the first place but that's also various other techniques to boost performance figures.

100% parental freedom is a nice idea but it boils down to very limited choice for many families. There are only a few schools within reach and the best ones are usually oversubscribed. With so much money at stake it's not a bad idea for parents to know how much better their child is likely to do if they pay more rather than how much better the school's results are.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 07:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
Is making people responsible for their actions the right thing to do? sometimes. Clearly you're pointing towards the empathy to those misbehaving as oppressed. Maternal
Personal responsibility is a good thing even for children but they are children not adults. Consequences should be minimised and 2nd chances along with as much help as we can provide are very good things. I think the same is true for adults as well but in addition when it's children we also have a big responsibility to care for them.


This point is true of everything but when judgements and expectations are used to decide outcomes we introduce one of the most damaging forms of racial/etc bias. It comes from the least racist, most well meaning people as well as those who are actually racist/etc.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 07:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
It is a foundational principle that only the left has agency.
Which is of course nonsense (if anyone believes it)

In reality no-one has 100% agency. Dont matter a jot what side they are on politically.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 11:00 AM
Re: kids getting kicked out of school

Unpacking the Drivers of Racial Disparities in School Suspension and Expulsion (2019; full text)

Quote:
School suspension and expulsion are important forms of punishment that disproportionately affect Black students, with long-term consequences for educational attainment and other indicators of wellbeing. Prior research identifies three mechanisms that help account for racial disparities in suspension and expulsion: between-school sorting, differences in student behaviors, and differences in the treatment and support of students with similar behaviors. We extend this literature by (1) comparing the contributions of these three mechanisms in a single study, (2) assessing behavior and school composition when children enter kindergarten and before most are exposed to school discipline, and (3) using both teacher and parent reports of student behaviors.

Decomposition analyses reveal that differential treatment and support account for 46 percent of the Black/White gap in suspension/expulsion, while between-school sorting and differences in behavior account for 21 percent and 9 percent of the gap respectively. Results are similar for boys and girls and robust to the use of school fixed effects and measures of school composition and student behavior at ages 5 and 9. Theoretically, our findings highlight differential treatment/support after children enter school as an important but understudied mechanism in the early criminalization of Black students.
Note that the new empirical data in this study is focused on suspension and expulsion of elementary school students. I think that's probably younger than the kids people think of, but it also seems useful given that children's attitudes about education are probably shaped by these early experiences.

A few quotes:

Quote:
the differential treatment/support perspective argues that Black students are more likely to be suspended than White students even when they enter school with the same behavior. Differences in punishment may be due to racial bias on the part of teachers and school officials (Okonofua and Eberhardt 2015), race differences in students’ access to settings and resources that promote social emotional learning and school engagement (Lewis and Diamond 2015; Weinstein 2002), and differences in parents’ ability to advocate for their child (Lareau and Horvat 1999). These factors can themselves instigate a “self-fulfilling prophecy” or a “vicious cycle” that leads to worsening behaviors (Okonofua, Walton and Eberhardt 2016; Weinstein 2002).
Quote:
Our study makes four important contributions to the literatures on education, stratification, delinquency and social control, and social psychology. First, whereas past research on delinquency and social control has focused primarily on racial disparities among adolescents and adults and on punishment within the criminal justice system, we document a large racial gap in punishment among children in elementary school. Using data on a cohort of children born in large U.S. cities at the turn of the 21st century and attending elementary school between 2003 and 2009, we document a roughly 21 percentage-point racial gap in suspension – 28 percent of Black children versus 7 percent of White children—by the 4th grade.

Second, our results lend strong support to the differential treatment/support hypothesis using a national sample of children born in large US cities between 1998 and 2000 and attending elementary school between 2003 and 2009. We find that, even within the exact same school, each unit increase in kindergarten behavior problems is, on average, associated with a 1.5 percentage-point larger increase in suspension among Black than White children, holding constant all time-invariant characteristics of schools as well as other child and family characteristics....

We also help clarify prior results by showing that behavior differences account for a relatively small share (9 percent) of the gap when behavior is measured at school entry and prior to suspension. Finally, we find that a large portion (46 percent) of the racial gap is due to the differential treatment/support of Black and White children who attend similar schools and who exhibit similar behaviors at the time they enter school.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 11:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
That's the dirty secret the public system doesn't want people to know. The tuition cost for that private school was significantly less than the annual expenditure per pupil for MPS.

Better outcomes, lower cost. But you can be certain that after the 18th or 19th time one of my kids got in a fight or told a teacher to **** off, they'd have lost their spot.
Public schools don't have that luxury though. They're obliged to take every child, regardless of whether the kid is 'good' or not, and then they're also obliged to try to do their best to give said kid an education. Whereas private schools can take the cream of the crop (often determined by the $$) and wipe their hands of the ones who may be poor, disadvantaged, handicapped, or just plain dumb.

It's a lot easier to get better results for less cost when you get to cherry pick your sample size, which private schools do.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 11:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
Something like:

a) the liberal motivation to intervene to fix social problems for people is "maternally" motivated (because supposedly it's motivated by empathy)

b) the conservative motivation to tell people to sort their own **** out is "paternally" motivated (because supposedly it's connected to stereotypically masculine attitudes about rugged independence? He didn't really say)

c) People on the left have emphasized the "maternal" orientation so strongly that they can no longer recognize the validity of the "paternal" perspective.

It's basically the structure/agency disagreement re-cast (unnecessarily, IMO) in gendered language, with a veneer of psychology meant to explain why people prefer one or the other view. He did say that both orientations were "equal and valid perspectives" in his previous post, if it helps at all. I'd probably still prefer to avoid gendering the topic, but whatever.
Meh, it's just a way to say liberals are 'mama's boys' while conservatives are manly and strong.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 11:28 AM
In that case I prefer the Garrison cartoons :P
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Cut
Simple conservative solutions.

Drug addiction epidemic: Just say no.
Inner-city schools: Behave yourself.
illegal aliens: build a wall
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 03:47 PM
No, "behave yourselves" would cover illegal aliens, too.

Can you just, not break our laws?
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 04:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
No, "behave yourselves" would cover illegal aliens, too.

Can you just, not break our laws?
Why should they? I am not just being glib either.

If you think about it for a second; if conditions are as bad in their home countries as they perceive and the potential benefit/cost ratio of trying to migrate as high as they perceive (I think there is some false hope here), it does not seem there is either a practical or ethical rationale not to attempt to migrate.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 04:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
He did say that both orientations were "equal and valid perspectives" in his previous post, if it helps at all.
His post (and his history) drips with context that suggests he doesn't actually think this, though
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 04:10 PM
I don't disagree with you.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
I don't disagree with you.
Well, the extension of his logic would dictate that men should lean conservative and women liberal. So the real misbalance (here specifically at least) is all the liberal men and their feminized psychological processes.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 04:43 PM
This implication had not escaped me. Nor anyone else, I imagine. Hence:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
It's basically just him calling people "sissies" but with some Jordan Peterson psycho-babbling mixed in.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 04:46 PM
What do the actual stats say?
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named

It was an interesting read, but left much to be desired.

They tried to control for socioeconomic background, but it's hard to control for 84% of the black kids in the study having an absent father vs 47% of the white kids.

They also acknowledge that black child behaviors worsened at a greater rate than the white kids, but attribute that to the suspension gap itself. Ehhhh okay? Maybe the home-life relates to those worsening behavior problems.


Quote:
find that White teachers are more likely than Black teachers to punish Black students. However, lacking prospective measures of student behavior prior to any suspension, this study cannot rule out the possibility that Black students behave better around Black teachers as compared to White teachers
This is the sort of thing you can't just figure out by reviewing data, but I think would be a pretty important part of the puzzle.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote
08-01-2019 , 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelhus999
Well, the extension of his logic would dictate that men should lean conservative and women liberal. So the real misbalance (here specifically at least) is all the liberal men and their feminized psychological processes.
See, you’re never afraid to say the quiet part out loud, that’s why I your posting more than Juan’s.
Conservatives: What are your principles? Quote

      
m