Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
I'm not sure where to even start with that.
Let's roll this back to the topic at hand - Maria Kang and her ad. So...people can't share their thoughts on the ad unless it's targeted directly to them, otherwise they're being a snowflake and everything is about them?
Isn't this forum built at least partially on people commenting on things that don't directly impact them? Or for that matter, isn't that how much of Internet interactions work?
That's not what was done. You are being dishonest in your portrait and I know why.
She was savaged in attacks by people saying she had said and done something extremely offensive.
The equivalency would be people on this forum shouting at its very existence and you not banning them.
The EXACT proper equivalency is a person walking in to the self help aisle of a book store and savaging the book store staff or better yet the authors for
"What is your excuse for not getting your finances in Shape. An ABC book on money and Finance"
ZOMG, what if I am not interested in saving money? What if I am not interested in being disciplined? Don't I have that right? Why am I being forced to read about other people who care about this.
And absolutely yes, that is snowflake material. It is indulgent little ***** material, to go into bookstores or challenge authors for those Self Help targeted material simply because it is not speaking to you, when it DOES speak to others.
Quote:
Cool story, bro. Is someone saying there is?
Yes. You are in saying mobs of people can and should attack people for that instead of saying 'no that is not appropriate'.
What you will do next is try to wrap that as an absolute right as if I am saying they should not have free speech when that has nothing to do with the point. Having the right does not mean it is proper and this was very improper. Grossly so. And you condone it and throw shade for it, which is sad.