He is a ****ing horrible individual. A sex pest that is swinging on Boris Johnson's ballsack when he isn't touching blokes up in pubs and bars.

Oh absolutely, I've seen his voting record, he's a toady of the highest order.

He’s a very weird guy. Isn’t this the 2nd time he’s done this?

Yes, he did it earlier this year in a pub near Westminster.

Someone really ought to leak this report, since the government's illegally sitting on it till after the election. (Gosh, I can't think why that might be.) The chairman of the Commons committee, who's a former attorney general and current Independent MP, and who could offer a bulletproof public-interest defence if the government tried to prosecute him, might be a candidate to have a go at that.

I posted earlier about Ian Murray, the MP with the safest seat in the country that Corbyn's Unite henchmen tried to deselect (and failed miserably). It's clear from Murray's election materials that he knows what's needed to win again...and it's not mentioning Labour.

That article is pure wishful thinking if they think pro-Remain tactical voting is going to win seats that voted Leave in 2016 - such as Lib Dem target number 4, St. Ives which was 55-45 Leave.

In fact, I think the reverse applies. Because of the differing enthusiasm/anger levels of Leavers/Remainers with the current situation, I'd say the breakeven point between a seat being practically counted as "leave" rather than "remain" for the purpose of deciding whether the MP or candidate's position is a liability rather than an asset is something like 60-40 majority for Remain. There are only 100 seats in total with more than a 60-40 leave vote of which, 40 are outside England, 60 of them are in England, mostly in London and university cities.

So for example they mention Chingford with 52% Remain in the referendum, that place is going to have more angry leavers than unhappy remainers voting on that basis.

IMHO That's why the polls are as they are.

how can people vote for this cons government. Some parts i can see are appealing to voting for cons but this government just seems evil scum. Forever lying, misleading, insulting and just clearly not giving a **** about general population. Wtf is so appealing about them. Theyre horrible.

JRM, what a nobhead.

No.

Do they accept payments in euros?

More true than ever.

Well you have Chris Law who lives in a £600k castle and has the begging bowl out. Maybe he'd accept payment in petrol for the Aston Martin DB9 that he drives?







Just to add another little bit of info on this one, he claimed 3 years ago the castle would be used as a facility for children with Special Needs but this appears to have been forgotten about now that he's moved in

https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news...ayside-castle/

The state of that ****.

Agreed. And he's a bit of a state as well...

lol

Ian Austin going in with studs up on Corbyn this morning...

**** every single person who has spend the four+ years trolling, lying about and race-baiting Britain's Jews.

Yes.

https://www.opinium.co.uk/wp-content...19-Tables.xlsx

Table GEN1 has
Which of the following are you most likely to base your vote on - Brexit

broken down (based on answers to other questions) as

Diehard Remainer 59 of the 105 will vote mainly on this issue.
Concerned Remainer 208 of 501
Persuadable Remainer 28 of 134
Subtotal 295 of 740 will vote primarily for Remain

Persuadable Leavers 47 of 214 (now favours soft Brexit - this group is made up of about 50-50 leave/remain voters from 2017, the other groups haven't changed overwhelmingly)
Compromise Leavers 98 of 249
Diehard Leavers 314 of 522
Subtotal 412 of 771 (or 459 of 985 if we include the persuadable leaver group)

So based on this poll overall there are 1.40 times (or 1.56 times) as many people voting primarily based on Leave sentiment as there are people voting primarily based on Remain sentiment.

In other words, a constituency which is originally made up of 58-42 (or 61-39) Remain voters is for the purposes of this election actually neutral ground. If it has a higher number of Remain voters then its an advantage to be a Remain MP or candidate there. If it has a lower number of Remain voters than that its an advantage to be a Leave MP or candidate there. There are about 100 seats in the UK which re thought to have voted by more than 60-40 to remain, only 60 of which are in England, mostly in London and the university cities. All the places in the SE of England which voted narrowly to remain by margins like 52-48 are going to have more Leave voters. It's fantasy for the Lib Dems to think seats like that can be won by pro-Remain tactical voting though they will undoubtedly do well in London.

Someone recently posted on facebook that the election will be an opportunity for politicians to learn how the country they live in differs from their Twitter timeline, it's no surprise that arch-remainer Tom Watson has pulled out after a couple of days campaigning in a seat that voted 68-32 to leave.

Hopefully the takeaway from this election will be that the Left will finally learn that if they hand the Union Jack to the right it's going to get waved back at them in their faces.

No.

Some 75 out of 76 polls in the last two years have consistently shown a majority for Remain. Just in case anyone doesn't know what I'm talking about. This is the most recent poll and it is solidly on-trend.

^^^That doesn't disprove his point at all unfortunately

Antisemitism in the Labour Party has justly had a lot of attention here; less so the Tories' Islamophobia.

https://www.theguardian.com/news/201...-isolate-warsi

It's uncanny how often that, when your first impression of an MP is they are a useless tosser, that judgement is confirmed.

When you look at the likes of Francois, Grayling and Hancock, it's amazing they can even dress themselves in the morning, never mind make it to Westminster and the cabinet.

Hancock is probably smart and reasonable (on some level), but defending Boris Johnson and the Tory party necessitates be-clowning yourself.