Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
British Politics British Politics

10-23-2020 , 04:03 AM
I think you underestimate their supply of useless wankers.

But hunt would almost certainly take the job along with a few others who are giants compared to hancock. **** it's depressing when Hunt is a massively better prospect for the job.
British Politics Quote
10-23-2020 , 04:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I think you underestimate their supply of useless wankers.
I love this part of your post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
But hunt would almost certainly take the job along with a few others who are giants compared to hancock. **** it's depressing when Hunt is a massively better prospect for the job.
Would Hunt work for Johnson though?
British Politics Quote
10-23-2020 , 04:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImpracticalPoker
Would Hunt work for Johnson though?
Yeah. It's not a job he could refuse unless there were some bizarre conditions attached.

It's actually quite a good job now. Huge budget, tons of the underlying resouces are available, the big problem is someone elses fault and there's the real opportunity to get a grip and run it properly.
British Politics Quote
10-23-2020 , 08:40 AM
Where was Hunt on Brexit?
British Politics Quote
10-23-2020 , 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ImpracticalPoker
My local MP is Jacob Young (also Tory gain in 2019, might actually be same constituency we are referring to here) and he voted against free school meals policy. This is an awful decision on two counts - 1) The policy is clearly the right thing to do from a morality standpoint and 2) Its clearly a massively popular policy in areas such as his constituency and he voted the opposite way. If he continues making decisions like this, he'll be booted out at next election and rightly so.
Mine is Gary Sambrook, Birmingham Northfield. Very similar by the looks of it. Both took historically Labour constituencies, both young, both seemingly unscrupulous.
British Politics Quote
10-23-2020 , 03:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 On Red
No. Transgenderism is being used as a deliberate attack on women's rights. It doesn't really have anything to do with transgender or transsexual people. It is all about destroying women's rights.
Saying 'transgenderism' is some kid of considered and calculated attack on women's rights is tin foil hat nonsense. It's not to say there aren't issues and complications that have to be discussed, but to suggest that the very purpose of increased trans rights is to attack women is just so wrong. Couldn't let that one go without response.
British Politics Quote
10-23-2020 , 05:25 PM
+1
British Politics Quote
10-24-2020 , 01:52 AM
+2
British Politics Quote
10-25-2020 , 02:35 AM
Good to see the always impressive Tobais Ellwood leading the revolt against the absurd decision over free school meals.

Hard to believe a government could be so poor as to have to u-turn over the same issue twice within a couple of months. Somehow, Johnson seems incapable of recognising that if you surround yourself with idiots, they will make idiotic decisions.
British Politics Quote
10-26-2020 , 07:39 AM
An overeducated idiot will find it hard to recognise stupidity in others; Cummings hand-picked them for stupidity and loyalty.
British Politics Quote
10-29-2020 , 06:09 AM
Labour Party was responsible for anti-Semitic discrimination and broke equality laws

Not surprising for anyone, aside from anti-Semites and those with a blind spot for left-wing racism.

Hopefully this will draw a line under the whole distasteful episode and enable Starmer to rebuild trust with the Jewish communities.
British Politics Quote
10-29-2020 , 06:27 AM
It sounds like there is enough there for Starmer to justify cleaning house. **** Corbyn off out of the party for starters, with any luck some of his entourage will go too.
British Politics Quote
10-29-2020 , 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
It sounds like there is enough there for Starmer to justify cleaning house. **** Corbyn off out of the party for starters, with any luck some of his entourage will go too.
British Politics Quote
10-29-2020 , 09:58 AM
Labour suspends Jeremy Corbyn over anti-Semitism report

Impressive against from Starmer - swift and decisive.
British Politics Quote
10-29-2020 , 12:29 PM
Well played Starmer, more please
British Politics Quote
10-29-2020 , 02:35 PM
The tankies are trying to park their tanks on Keir's lawn, except unfortunately (a) they can't find anyone with a tracked-vehicle driving licence and (b) they haven't got any tanks.



It's a good day, but Starmer has an awful lot to do -- he'll have to exceed Kinnock's honourable record of action against Militant -- and, since Corbyn can't now stand as a Labour candidate, Islington North need to deselect him. (Tony Blair's biggest mistake apart from Iraq was not letting them do that when they wanted to in the late '90s.) It has to be scorched earth and no prisoners or this will just keep happening. As Orwell and Attlee knew, Communists should have no place in Labour.
British Politics Quote
10-29-2020 , 02:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SereneTuna
Saying 'transgenderism' is some kid of considered and calculated attack on women's rights is tin foil hat nonsense. It's not to say there aren't issues and complications that have to be discussed, but to suggest that the very purpose of increased trans rights is to attack women is just so wrong. Couldn't let that one go without response.
The principal trans rights org, Stonewall, states that its aims are to eliminate the single-sex exemptions under the Equality Act 2010 and to eliminate 'sex' as a protected category under the Act. That is, quite overtly, an attack on women's rights.
British Politics Quote
10-29-2020 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 On Red
The principal trans rights org, Stonewall, states that its aims are to eliminate the single-sex exemptions under the Equality Act 2010 and to eliminate 'sex' as a protected category under the Act. That is, quite overtly, an attack on women's rights.
The first bolded claim is deliberately misleading; Stonewall's aim is to eliminate the exemptions specifically relating to "gender reassignment" (and also change the protected class to "gender identity" rather than the unclear "gender reassignment" to more clearly protect the rights of all trans people), not single-sex exemptions in general.

As for the second, as far as I can tell it is just completely made up. There is certainly nothing even close to that in their main vision for trans equality or in their general election manifesto from last year.
British Politics Quote
10-30-2020 , 04:22 PM
Quote:
Covid is spreading "significantly" faster through England than even the government's predicted "worst-case" scenario, documents reveal.

The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) says there are around four times as many people catching Covid than anticipated.

A "reasonable worst-case scenario" is used by officials and the NHS to plan for the months ahead.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54750775

Only 4 times the reasonable worst case planning estimate. Hancock is improving ...
British Politics Quote
10-30-2020 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
National Covid lockdown expected across England next week

Boris Johnson bows to pressure from experts who warned worst-case scenario could soon be surpassed
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...nd-experts-say


Also 2 cases of weakish early evidence of what was obviously going to happen have starting to emerge.

****ing idiots #1
Quote:
'Eat out to help out' may have caused fifth of Covid clusters over summer
https://www.theguardian.com/business...-rise-in-covid

-------

****ing idiots #2
Quote:
A coronavirus mutation that originated in Spanish farm workers has spread rapidly through Europe and now accounts for most UK cases, a new study suggests. The variant, called 20A.EU1, is known to have spread from farm workers to local populations in Spain in June and July. People returning from holidays in Spain over the summer are believed to have played a key role in spreading the strain across Europe.
https://metro.co.uk/2020/10/30/covid...ases-13505716/
British Politics Quote
10-31-2020 , 10:34 AM
Boris going to sentence more people to death for no reason then
British Politics Quote
10-31-2020 , 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixfour
Boris going to sentence more people to death for no reason then
No reason [ ]

Sep 1. Hospitiliastions: 58
Sep 1. Ventilators: 59

Sep 15th:H 194
Sep 15th:V 101

Sep 29th:H 310
Sep 29th:V 259

Oct 13 H: 764
OCt 13 V: 441

Oct 27 H: 1190
Oct 27 V:752

Over the same period total in hospital has gone from: 472 to 8681.

Lets keep that trend trucking for another 2 months and see how many people die of reasons completely unrelated to C19.
British Politics Quote
10-31-2020 , 11:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixfour
Boris going to sentence more people to death for no reason then
They did that when they encouraged eating out and going on holiday (among other stupid things). Guaranteed death sentences. Huge numbers will die or have serious impairments because of it. Huge numbers will suffer economic hardship because of it.
British Politics Quote
10-31-2020 , 01:12 PM
Just wow at that
British Politics Quote
10-31-2020 , 01:19 PM
Government scared into lockdown #2 after SAGE forecasts of 4,000 deaths per day.
British Politics Quote

      
m