Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
My view is a compromise. Which is that we can look more and more askance at people who held immoral views as the evidence and the number of people opposing those views pile up.
Isn't this the only way to judge historical figures? If we dropped John Adams onto the floor of the Senate this afternoon, I'm sure his views on race would be repugnant.
But his views were extremely progressive for his era, and I think it's OK to credit him with being relatively enlightened for his time.
Similarly, I'm sure we can find plenty of people who sheltered Jews during WWII who would be considered (rightfully) as anti-Semitic by modern lights. But it makes little sense to criticize those people for their anti-Semitism.