Hmm. Your earlier post, and this post, were exactly what I expected from you.

This was a lot of words to say “my white supremacy complex is attacked and offended that people found this murder to not be OK”

Next time just say that. And save me your self righteous pivoting retort. You’ve said plenty.

it's like if we take every assertion in somi's distorted view of the facts as true or likely true, it's still murder.

lol. this isn't the hill to die on.

That and the apparently the father never fired. If their intent was to kill I doubt they ever give Arbery a chance to grab the shotgun. So maybe manslaughter is more appropriate? Idk, but something tells me we are going to see a hung jury in a couple of years.

New video shows Arbery walking in and around Larry English's home that was being built. That "just a jogger" narrative is really falling apart. Keep in mind this is the same home that had $2500 in fishing gear stolen from it earlier this year.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-killing.html

Whether he was a jogger or some sort of master burglar doesn't matter.

There was a case in Minnesota a few years ago where a homeowner who had been burgled a number of times hid in the basement with a shotgun and shot the two burglars when they returned. He got life for first degree murder. He recorded audio of the whole event, presumably thinking it would exonerate him (or maybe he was just a little nuts).

Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byron_...Smith_killings

Make of that what you will, but it seems that the law frowns upon people who use lethal force against burglars unless it's in self defence and proportional.

Oh, it absolutely matters. If some low life POS has been committing felony grand theft against you and your neighbors, and then you go after him to question him, and he responds by charging you, punching you, and trying to take your weapon...you better damn well believe that's not murder if you fire your weapon to protect yourself.

Correct. It really shouldn't matter.

There are numerous cases that stand for the similar proposition that you can't rig your windows with spring guns.

And keep in mind that this is a very different case. Having someone invade your home is very frightening and very threatening. Seeing someone trespass on a construction site is not.

Whenever there is a reported burglary, guys with shotguns are allowed to jump into their trucks and question whomever they suspect the burglar is?

Sounds absolutely ******ed.

What if the black guy fought back because he thought he was being hunted by 2 white guys with shot guns?

What about joggers that get abducted and killed by men with firearms?

Absolutely insane these 2 hillbillies.

If I was going for a random jog and 2 hillbillies pulled up to me with shot guns, I wouldn't react positively.

That case was actually worse. If you ever get in the weeds on that one, you will see that guy committed premeditated murder.

These beta male revenge gunporn fantasies are getting out of hand.

Again even if you take ever bit of your wet dream as gospel it’s still murder. they still saw a random person, went home and grabbed deadly weapons, ran that person down with at best the intent to deprive him of his liberty and then shot him to death when he defended HIMSELF from their attack on his freedoms.

all these conservatives and libertarians and 2nd amendment idiots are too stupid to realize they are on the wrong side of this even with regards to their pet issues..

they should be advocating that ahmaud should have had a firearm and then he could have protected himself from the crazed aggressors trying to attack his freedom. because we all know the only way to stop some bad guys with guns is a good guy with a gun..

i wonder why the never seem to realize that.. oh wait i know why.

Has nothing to do with with some fantasy wet dream. In fact, there is a very strong probability that it’s precisely what happened. And you know you’re being disingenuous when you have to LIE in your response. By all accounts, he wasn’t “some random person”. They had seen this exact same person on previous nights behaving suspiciously on the exact days that things were stolen...and they even directly witnessed him trespassing during his “jog” on this very day. He then ran from the scene when he knew he was seen in another man’s house and refused to answer questions. Some random person? No. A person who was demonstrating many of the signs of being a potential burglar.

Nice try. I’m about as liberal and progressive as they come. I just know bullshit when I smell it. And when NONE of the behavior and attire of the person in question indicate that he was some random innocent jogger, I’m going to call out the BS. Especially when video shows he did not do everything he could to avoid physical confrontation. In fact, he charged directly at the other man, punched him in the head or neck area, and tried to wrestle with him for his gun.

This liberal porn is getting out of hand. Always extrapolating these sick fantasies to a broader segment of people. I'm certain you are one of the people who take glee in this stuff so you can smack your moral righteousness on the right, except you look pathetic when you do it.

I thought the other report(made by these guys btw) said the guy had dreads/full sleeve tattoos?

If I chase you down the street with a gun, and you decide, for whatever reason, that instead of running away your best course of action is to try and confront/disarm me, and I end up shooting and killing you, do you think that I would skate on self defence just like that? What if I saw you shoplifting earlier?

it was actually better for you having people think you were just an ideological zealot. now you just look stupid and ignorant of how laws work

i do enjoy being correct. i dont really experience empathy,so it's not really about feeling bad for people. but being right is always a good time. thats why i stay around here so much even though i read the other better politics forum for news.

That's the cops job, if you go after him while armed then you're looking for a potential confrontation. You can't claim to feel threatened as he's off your property. Going after him armed is vigilantism so even if he was a burglar there's no way McMichaels were justified. Secondly I didn't see Arbery with any property or items on him so that's up for debate too although again ultimately irrelevant.

Please explain your views on the 2nd Amendment and stand your ground laws, Mr. Progressive.

Is there evidence of a deprivation of his liberty and him being attacked or is that just your interpretation of the video?