Quote:
Originally Posted by itshotinvegas
What's in their mind is irrelevant. If they don't have evidence he committed a crime, it does not matter what they think. You can't assault someone because you think they committed a crime. They would have to have witnessed this guy committing a crime to get by with that defense.
Did you read the police report? Lets say what they are claimed on the police report is completely truthful, and they did witness him burglarizing the vacant lot next door, and had evidence he had previously burglarized the lot. That still seems like GA would have to have some real wacky laws to legally justify their behavior.
And yet a DA already waved the case. So given this, either there is some serious malfeasance going on in the DAs office or Georgia really does have such laws.
I just wish our media took the job of journalism a little more seriously and was less manipulative, so we could get the real story. The fact I had to go to DailyMail to find the details I did says a lot about our media IMO.