Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ahmaud Arbery Killing -- 3 Guilty of Murder Ahmaud Arbery Killing -- 3 Guilty of Murder

11-13-2020 , 04:31 PM
Bump. I think some of this was known and some of it is new: McMichaels are denied bond in hearing that adds details on their racism

Quote:
The 34-year-old White man used racist slurs while referring to a “crackhead” in one text, prosecutors said, and mocked Asians with racist terms in a Facebook post. Prosecutors used the messages to argue that McMichael and his father, Gregory McMichael, 64, who is also charged with murder in Arbery’s death, shouldn’t be released on bond.

The revelations add to allegations that the McMichaels’ racism contributed to the fatal shooting of Arbery. A third defendant in the case, William “Roddie” Bryan Jr., 51, who allegedly recorded the shooting on his phone, told investigators that Travis used the n-word after shooting Arbery three times, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.
...
Evans read a comment Travis left on a Facebook post of a friend, Zachary Langford, in October 2019, in which he wrote “sayonara” followed by derogatory descriptors of Asians and an expletive, according to a recording of the hearing published by WXIA. The prosecutor also read a text message he said Travis sent to Langford the following month in which he used a racist slur regarding a “crackhead” with “gold teeth and a Hi-Point 45,” a type of pistol.

Langford, who was a witness on Thursday, said he didn’t recognize either message, though after reviewing the transcripts he said the text was referring to a raccoon and was “facetious.”

In an exchange with defense attorney Robert Rubin, Langford said that Travis had at least one Black friend and that he worked with Black people at his job at a drilling company.
This has it all:
- the "I was joking and/or using the word literally" defense of racist slurs (of course; why didn't anyone stop and think that maybe he was talking about a crackhead raccoon with gold teeth and a pistol?)
- the "he has a black friend/coworker" defense
11-17-2020 , 07:20 PM
ya but how could anyone know they were racist? /corpus vile
11-18-2020 , 11:58 AM
You're the real racist for even suggesting that a couple guys who chased down and murdered a Black guy are racist.
12-17-2020 , 06:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
It's amazing that *more shrill hyperbole*.
You never answered an earlier question- is it "logical" to hope Jacob Blake succumbs to his injuries and dies due to being a criminal or not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wet work
...Touche
12-20-2020 , 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
No he is TRYING to orchestrate a coup. That is undeniable fact. If the people he is pushing enacted what he is pressuring them to do, it would be a coup.

It would also be a Constitutional crisis which would require the courts to then resolve.


I missed this question if you asked but it seems to be a garbage question.

My position has been stated clearly despite your many attempts to change it. Which btw proves you know i am right and thus why you will not argue against what I actual say.


My scenario applies to only one set of circumstances and here it is again.

- You have an offender taking actions that puts others at risk (ex drunk driver, Active shooter in a crowd)
- You come across the scene later and there is a body bag in the street
- you determine it was the offender (shooter, drunk driver) and not an innocent bystander that died as a result of his actions.


I say, given any scenario that plays out like that I want it to be the offender (shooter, drunk driver) in the body bag, SINCE WE KNOW SOMEONE IS DEAD ANDJSUT DON"T KNOW WHO" and NOT the innocent bystander.

I also said if I had the ability to make it so no one died, I would, but I do not have that power.
Rayshard Broooks was a alleged drunk driver so you've just justified his shooting, by your own rationale. Yo're the one who went on your moral equivalence spiel and you're the one who specifically mentioned paedophiles. One of Kyle Rittenhouse's victims was a convicted sex offending paedo. By your own rationale it's "logical" to be happy about these deaths and hope that felons like Jacob Blake die from his injuries the way it's logical for Trump to die of covid.

Yet now none of this applies because reasons. It only applies to Trump because Orange Man Bad. Your inconsistency only highlights how ultimately, again you're simply a hateful individual regardless of how many times you attempt to justify your mindset.
12-20-2020 , 03:33 PM
CV just has the same post he makes over and over again, where he makes some dumb argument and then tries to pivot to grossly exaggerating some bad take he thinks the poster he's attacking made several months ago, as if he never said the killing of Ahmaud Arbery wasn't racist or got laughed at by the whole forum for his "Trump's election-denying antics are just like 2000 and 2016" takes (see what I did there?)
12-20-2020 , 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
*blah*
as if he never said the killing of Ahmaud Arbery wasn't racist
*moar blah*)
I never said the killing of AA wasn't racist, and already c&P'd a bunch of times precisely what I said in the AA thread regardless of your gaslighting attempts.

Please provide the verbatim quote where I asserted his murder wasn't racist.
Good luck with that too.
12-20-2020 , 06:37 PM
CV has a profound love for the word "whinge".
12-22-2020 , 04:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Spew
'Indeed/
Why are you allowing goofy to gaslight? Is it becaue he's a fellow mod? I never said AA murder was't racist and provided the quote and now the quote is deleted by the mods?

Why are you allowing such bad faith trolling behaviour from other posters?
12-22-2020 , 04:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tame_deuces
I cleaned up two trolling posts. Also, this is the election post-mortem thread. Old disagreements from other threads belong in those.
Then why are you allowing Goofy's post on Ahmaud Arbery if this is the election post mortem thread and why are you allowing his false accusation against me? I never once stated Mr Arbery's murder wasn't racist and provided the quote what I said which you deleted.

Why are you allowing his post? That's neither being fair or impartial.
12-22-2020 , 05:00 AM
Never said either of those things please provide the verbatim quotes where I did
12-22-2020 , 05:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
CV just has the same post he makes over and over again, where he makes some dumb argument and then tries to pivot to grossly exaggerating some bad take he thinks the poster he's attacking made several months ago, as if he never said the killing of Ahmaud Arbery wasn't racist or got laughed at by the whole forum for his "Trump's election-denying antics are just like 2000 and 2016" takes (see what I did there?)
For the bazillionth time, here's what I said re Ahmaud Arbery's murder.
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=1276

Quote:
Here's my position on the AA thread
I'm perfectly open minded on racism being a factor or motivation in Mr Arbery's killing but wasn't accepting that there was a racist factor in Mr Arbery's killing based on it being a white on black crime, it being in the south and one of the killers being born in the 50s, as well as it was racially motivated or based "because it just is."
I asked if M Sr's LE history could be unearthed and if he disproportionately target black people/non whites when a cop, online comments, neighbours coming forward etc.
I also said I was perfectly willing to change my mind on the matter and still am. I'm well aware racist murders can and do occur. I consider the murder of Jordan Davis for example as being racially motivated and certainly playing a factor as there's evidence or something of more substance to support this and also a case where it's perfectly valid to use when citing how the word thug can indeed be used as a racist dog whistle even if I don't agree that the word itself is always used in that context.
However re Mr Arbery's killing, you can't expect me to accept assertions of racism automatically based on such criteria,such as mere location and being of a certain age and the killers being white with the victim black.
.
As was said this is the election post mortem thread so take your false claims re other posters elsewhere, thanks
12-22-2020 , 05:20 AM
I have moved 8 posts here from the election-post mortem thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by corpus vile
Then why are you allowing Goofy's post on Ahmaud Arbery if this is the election post mortem thread and why are you allowing his false accusation against me? I never once stated Mr Arbery's murder wasn't racist and provided the quote what I said which you deleted.

Why are you allowing his post? That's neither being fair or impartial.
When you bring up an issue or intertwine two issues, people will respond. None of the parties are innocent when it comes to using characterisations.
12-22-2020 , 05:32 AM
I see you moved goofy's post to this thread TD so that's absolutely fair enough, cheers.
10-20-2021 , 12:44 PM
Jury selection in the trial has started.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/10/18/u...ial/index.html
10-20-2021 , 11:58 PM
So basically the Trayvon Martin case but with video and with 3 assailants instead of one. If Zimmerman was acquitted in Florida why wouldn't these guys be acquitted in Georgia? Of course the defense will be just as asinine. But I wonder how much that matters when, at the end of the day, common racist Americans think these sort of racial murders, over what they see as territory encroachment of a rival tribe, are great.

Saw that one of Zimmerman's defense attorneys was arrested for witness tampering in defense of a an accused child rapist. Slightly less respectable than the average internet Zimmerman apologist. Let's see what oozes out of the muck to defend these 3 beer bellied moron race warriors.
10-21-2021 , 08:11 AM
How has CV not been banned yet? All he does is come in and lie about murder victims.
10-21-2021 , 09:03 AM
I thought Zimmerman was a lying sack of **** when the story broke, and I have no use for civilians who want to act like de facto police because they get off on the power trip. But he at least had a story that his lawyers could tell to the jury and there was no video. Even so, I think he was fortunate to avoid a conviction. It wasn't a foregone conclusion.

Since that time, Zimmerman has done nothing but undermine his own credibility and further reveal his own racism. If he were on trial now, I think there would be a very low chance of an acquittal.

You never know with juries, but the video really should be game over for Arbery's killers.
10-21-2021 , 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
I thought Zimmerman was a lying sack of **** when the story broke, and I have no use for civilians who want to act like de facto police because they get off on the power trip. But he at least had a story that his lawyers could tell to the jury and there was no video. Even so, I think he was fortunate to avoid a conviction. It wasn't a foregone conclusion.

Since that time, Zimmerman has done nothing but undermine his own credibility and further reveal his own racism. If he were on trial now, I think there would be a very low chance of an acquittal.

You never know with juries, but the video really should be game over for Arbery's killers.

Right.

Also, they literally armed themselves and chased Arbery down. And it wasn't one schlep against a high school athlete. They could have just tried a citizen's arrest and detained him if that was their intent.

This was a posse formed to kill a black guy in the old tradition of the south.
Times change. Dummies don't.
10-21-2021 , 11:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
How has CV not been banned yet? All he does is come in and lie about murder victims.
Well CV rarely posts anymore here and when he does it seems he has moderated or softened many of his more extreme right type views.

If he does opine here I guess we will see if this area, 'race related crime' is one of them?
10-22-2021 , 12:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RFlushDiamonds
This was a posse formed to kill a black guy in the old tradition of the south.
Times change. Dummies don't.
Maybe a little different, and maybe that difference makes the crime more acceptable to a much wider swath of the South. You probably understand that what happened to Aubrey is what probably 35% of White southerners want to do to a Black male in their neighborhood. Part of Zimmerman's sympathy might have been based on this idea that people have a right to defend their territory against suspicious people. You know what suspicious means to them.

This isn't an Emmett Till situation of mob justice, which probably wouldn't be tolerated almost anywhere. It's easy to portray this to Southerners as a homeowner who was just a little overzealous. Then they will say the figure (who by then will be seen as a tupac-hulk hybrid) attacked and went for the gun and at that point it's a self defense situation for the well intended neighborhood watch.

This is the American way. You take things and exploit people and create a caste system. Then you get a bunch of guns and act all paranoid on hair trigger worrying that someone from the lower caste will get the idea to take something back. There is empathy for these monsters.
10-22-2021 , 04:33 AM
But it all turns on that word "suspicious". When "black" means "suspicious", well there's the problem ...
10-22-2021 , 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
Maybe a little different, and maybe that difference makes the crime more acceptable to a much wider swath of the South. You probably understand that what happened to Aubrey is what probably 35% of White southerners want to do to a Black male in their neighborhood. Part of Zimmerman's sympathy might have been based on this idea that people have a right to defend their territory against suspicious people. You know what suspicious means to them.

This isn't an Emmett Till situation of mob justice, which probably wouldn't be tolerated almost anywhere. It's easy to portray this to Southerners as a homeowner who was just a little overzealous. Then they will say the figure (who by then will be seen as a tupac-hulk hybrid) attacked and went for the gun and at that point it's a self defense situation for the well intended neighborhood watch.

This is the American way. You take things and exploit people and create a caste system. Then you get a bunch of guns and act all paranoid on hair trigger worrying that someone from the lower caste will get the idea to take something back. There is empathy for these monsters.
35% of white East Coast guys probably 'want' to do that too. But they would never dream of it. They understand that their racism won't be tolerated and hasn't been for decades. It takes time to dismantle that caste system and generations need to pass.

But yeah. It's all about the caste system. Remember when we used to finger point at S. Africa ? lol@us.
10-22-2021 , 09:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuepee
Well CV rarely posts anymore here and when he does it seems he has moderated or softened many of his more extreme right type views.

If he does opine here I guess we will see if this area, 'race related crime' is one of them?
I don't have any extreme right wing views and am centre/moderate left, politically. You leveled this accusation at me before several times but then refused to provide any examples despite being challenged to several times.
I gave my thoughts on AA's murder lots of times over and am not interested in any continued further gaslighting attempts to falsely claim otherwise or to falsely label me. I stand by my comments itt.
Personally I hope the McMichaels get life without parole, as I already stated before. If they can get a further consecutive sentence for hate crime then even better. That's it.

Nor have I lied about any murder victims and your highlighted comment is one of the many many reasons I have trolly on ig and have no need to entertain him anyway, due to his crap, nor am I sure why he's making false accusations against me now, considering I haven't posted here in a while and itt in particular. Speaking of which, stop trying to drag me back into this thread as October is my horror month and I've better things to do than correct persistent falsehoods about me, cheers.

Last edited by corpus vile; 10-22-2021 at 09:59 AM.
10-22-2021 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuces McKracken
So basically the Trayvon Martin case but with video and with 3 assailants instead of one. If Zimmerman was acquitted in Florida why wouldn't these guys be acquitted in Georgia? Of course the defense will be just as asinine. But I wonder how much that matters when, at the end of the day, common racist Americans think these sort of racial murders, over what they see as territory encroachment of a rival tribe, are great.

Saw that one of Zimmerman's defense attorneys was arrested for witness tampering in defense of a an accused child rapist. Slightly less respectable than the average internet Zimmerman apologist. Let's see what oozes out of the muck to defend these 3 beer bellied moron race warriors.
I doubt the McMichaels will be acquitted. A GBI agent testified that he viewed AA going for the shotgun as an act of self defence. I don;t think their actions will be covered by the stand your ground law in Georgia. I doubt the McMichaels are gonna walk from this.

      
m