Quote:
Originally Posted by lozen
Well as for the booster comment what are we on now the 5th booster in my country for some. So a 7th booster by the new year is not unreal that is not a lie but a prediction were some folks will be.
So at most people (likely those at risk) could have had 5, but you snarkily said to others to go get their 7th with the standard implication that they were sheeple, and your way of explaining that it was "accurate" is by some wonky math that maybe some people could maybe have a 7th booster (which, no) by next year. That is exactly the type of stuff I was talking about - you misrepresent stuff all the time, but I think you put little thought in your lies, and some times you believe what you are saying, while others, like this - you were just having a bit of a hissy fit and this is your go to routine. Still, it is basically lying/misrepresenting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lozen
The View thing of course is just a reply to you saying anyone with an opinion other than a leftist opinion is a derp of the right wing media
Thing is - I comment directly on your sources - where they come from, if they are opinion pieces etc. I have never suggested you read Nazi sites for instance, because you never posted material from them, and I would not put it on you to read them, so I would not suggest it even as a form of insult. Fortunately, your sources tend to be pretty derpy and often times just very biased opinion pieces, so I can work with what you provide.
In contrast, the only one who ever mentioned the View was you. I doubt any other poster ever made a comment about that show (no shock given its demographic), but it was another way you tried to hurl an insult by lying about someone, in this case suggesting I was a show that is watched by nearly all women. That fits with your dabbling with misogyny at times here that you would use that as a tactic, but again, while it was a nonsensical nothingburger that made you look strange, it was an example of how you lie/misrepresent things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lozen
Corrected on what in the Canada thread. I even not put warning labels on opinion pieces for you
You get corrected all the time when you consume and spew some alt-right talking point about the context and the way it is misrepresenting reality. Happened today with the judge appointing thing for instance. In these cases I doubt you even bother to fact check before you regurgitate the stuff (because - Trudeau bad), but you toss out intentionally misrepresenting material all the time, and the makers of that target you because of just that. They know their business model.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lozen
Sorry if I believe Justin Trudeau is as corrupt as Donald Trump and I just dont think the Democrats actually care about the poor and middle class
You can whine about Trudeau all you like, and you are entitled to do that. You do lie and misrepresent information a lot, so up to you if you want to bother changing that or not. There are other posters here who do not care in the slightest if what they are saying is true or not, but I think you still have a sliver of wanting to be accurate left in you, so take that as a relative compliment, and consider this - a lot of people, not just obsessed Trudeau haters like you - are looking for a change. If you go full alt-right derp - you will have Trudeau to be upset about for many more years. Keep it going with Hunter/Trump, but maybe re-think that strategy a bit for the Canadian elections in the future if winning them matters to you.
One thing I noticed was you did not give a single example of how I lie even after saying I lie all the time. Obviously I predicted that, so safe to say that is another example of how you emotionally misrepresent reality. Maybe do that less moving forward.