Quote:
Originally Posted by BetOnline Chris
Appreciate the feedback. I'll make sure to pass that along.
Thanks,
Chris
Thanks for your effort, I have to say from what I've seen you come accross a lot more responsive than the previous rep, so thanks for that.
However, a lot of the time it doesn't seem like one side of the site knows what the other side is doing. While you pass along feedback about possible Rakeback, it is clear there won't be any.
A few months ago Chico Network, including Betonline, removed all affiliate deals (we got up to 20% Rakeback from our affiliates) to "keep the games healthy", eg. prevent more Regs from joining and to get rid off bad Regs who play mainly for the affiliate Rakeback.
Now, a couple months later, they team up with pokerstrategy.com, a very very big affiliate/pokerschool, which will ultimately bring players to BOL, but none of them will be a pure fish (the players may not be crushers usually, but the average player coming from them will be a "mediocre-bad Reg", which will be bad for both the games overall, and thus will be bad for all players (winning players win less, recreational players will lose faster)) .
This is what I meant about all of this being ironic. But like I said, sadly this hasn't been the only decision no one can understand over the last year or so.