sorttmetal is a bot. 100% confirmed. people already sent emails and he keeps playing. he usually plays PLO200 and PLO500

Why do you care? LOL

+1

I believe there's 3. Sorttmetal (100% sure), LopTop (75%) and Nostradamus (50%).

They never play 5/10 no matter how good or bad the games are but they will play anybody all day long at 2/5. They never adjust their frequencies to your play and they all do things no other regulars do.

LopTop is down around 7k so if he is a bot he is bad as hell or running very bad.

sorttmetals +35k is impressive it could be a bot yeah or very good reg.

Hallo, I am a newbie on this forum & cant find the way to send u a private message. Also playing cash. It would be interesting to get some information about finding bots.

By the way I noticed on Betonline one strange thing, winrate on nl200 is much bigger then on nl100 on 200K+ hands. May be it is somehow related to the bots. For example, there could be just much more bots on nl100.

Hello Taison and welcome to the forum!

You need to make a certain number of posts before private messaging is enabled for a new account. The actual amount is a mystery that the mods keep a secret so that people don't come here and spam members via private message. Just keep posting(preferably good content) and in a few days you should be able to send me a private message.

It's possible that the increased amount of bots has an effect on winrate, but I also think that rake, variance and other factors may be playing a part in what you're seeing. 100NL tends be a bit softer than 200NL when the table isn't full of bots, but there's always a possibility you've gotten luckier with good seats and variance at the higher stake.

Guys dont mention PLO bot nicks, i know its obvious for us and even for some recs at the table. Just private message Mike (I did send him all the PLO bots 11+ from PLO100-200 about a week ago)
I know its about 0-5% chance that something will be done, but still...

Hi Makati,

Something is being done, and I just wanted to reassure you and the whole community that we are working on this.

Kind Regards

Mike

Yah, this is 100%. Also a group that always play at PLO100 and 200 that are beyond obvious 100% bots as well. To be honest though, any serious regs at these levels should be printing money against them. Just take a couple days and study their every move. You'll notice some glaring weaknesses and exploits and it it's such a massive increase in your winrate b/c so many hands are played against these bots and they're all the exact same postflop.

Hey, Mike,

Thanks to BOL for bringing back $.02/.05 Boost (now Fast Fold?) with the addition of Run It Twice. It's really fun, and having Run It Twice is great. We just need more people to discover it and start playing. Yesterday at one point there were up to 20 players, but most of the time it was 5 or less. With 20 players, the pots were averaging about equal to the $.05/.10 cash games that were running at the same time.

Maybe it will just take some time for people to notice it's there now, and then hopefully it will really take off.

Hi Mike. Will you please consider adding $0.01/$0.02 and $0.02/$0.05 NL cash games. It is kind of expensive for beginners like me to try and get better playing at $0.05/$0.10. You all used to have those micro stakes but you got rid of them when you upgraded your software.

The alternative is to only spend $2.20 per week on your poker side playing the Sunday Main Event Micro tournament. Surely if you all can take sports bets as low as $1 you can also make money with poker micro stakes.

Thanks.

Sent from my LM-X410(FG) using Tapatalk

Hey guys keep all the comments and suggestions coming please.
We are constantly trying to improve things on the site so that you guys have the best playing experience with us.


Kind Regards

Mike

I really like run it twice tables in PLO , also many casual players chatted and enjoyed straddling

Any idea when the lobby will return viewing of players at the tables without opening a table?

+1

+1 indeed! don't understand from a business standpoint why this was removed to begin with

+1

I imagine this was done to slow down bumhunters. It makes it harder to scan tables which is better for recreationals and the regulars willing to start games. It is annoying but I think it favors the right player types.*assuming it was intentionally done*

I wouldn't mind as much if there wasn't people still using seating scripts. It gives them an even bigger advantage over people not using them since they don't have to constantly scan tables manually.

How do you know they will not ban seating scripts? May be why there were a lot of erroneous emails (or not so erroneous) admitted to?

I don't. All I know is what I see at the tables. Emails may have been sent to every person using a seating script, but it certainly hasn't deterred several players from continuing to use one.

Yeah I just withdrew my balance bc of scripters. The best I could ever do is like 3rd on the waiting list or so by keeping the tables open where people are camping. Your options are get ****ed by scripters or use one and risk ban+confiscation. No thank you.

I don't think there are scripts running in my games, but I don't play NL. My advice would be to record date/time/table/hand number/scripter for each instance of scripting you see and report to BOL Mike or send info to support/security. It might be a waste of time but it could also solve the problem if they get enough complaints/proof. The potential reward is worth the effort imo.

Its been a while since I saw someone snapseating right after a rec sat at the table. I also regulary get seats by just monitoring the table and manually sitting if a rec joins if I dont feel like battling for the tables. Talking about NL500-2k.
Are we playing on the same site?