William Hill (iPoker) - Support confirmed use of bots? - Page 16 - Internet Poker

Two Plus Two Forums Online Poker Sites & Marketplaces Online Poker Sites Discussion of Poker Sites

William Hill (iPoker) - Support confirmed use of bots?

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 16 of 16

6 11 12 13 14 15 16

Page 16 of 16

6 11 12 13 14 15 16

10-20-2011 , 03:49 AM

#376

Quasar30

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,866

Shouldnt this thread title be changed?

Quote

10-20-2011 , 04:20 AM

#377

Bobo Fett

Carpe Diem

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 56,895

To what?

Quote

10-20-2011 , 04:26 AM

#378

Quasar30

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,866

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobo Fett

To what?

To something like bots for casino skill games (where its standard to use bots), not poker?

Quote

10-20-2011 , 04:31 AM

#379

Bobo Fett

Carpe Diem

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 56,895

Ah, OK. Well, while I agree that's what they were talking about, there are others that won't. The thread title isn't inaccurate, as support actually did initially say it was a bot in the poker room, and there are some who don't believe the corrections that have since been made. However, the title was changed a long time ago to reflect the fact that there was uncertainty around the issue.

Quote

10-22-2011 , 10:49 AM

#380

REL0AD

centurion

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 103

Maybe change to Will Hill affiliates endorse bots instead - shocking if this is true at pokerq4 (hope I'm ok to mention - it NEEDS to be mentioned)

Quote

10-22-2011 , 10:59 AM

#381

39suited

But it was suited

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 8,189

Quote:

Originally Posted by REL0AD

Maybe change to Will Hill affiliates endorse bots instead - shocking if this is true at pokerq4 (hope I'm ok to mention - it NEEDS to be mentioned)

Care to evaluate?

Quote

10-22-2011 , 12:40 PM

#382

ArtySmokes

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 6,999

From http://www.pokerq4.com/

Quote:

William Hill Poker, an iPoker operator, could have some explaining to do after it transpires that one of their affiliate partners may be a supplier of free poker bot software that is only compatible with William Hill Poker software

It's pretty crazy. When you install the bot software, it evidently prompts you to start the Will Hill software, while also telling you about the sign-up bonus.

Quote

10-24-2011 , 06:16 AM

#383

bertie_tapper.god.

enthusiast

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 82

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArtySmokes

From http://www.pokerq4.com/

It's pretty crazy. When you install the bot software, it evidently prompts you to start the Will Hill software, while also telling you about the sign-up bonus.

WOW. looks like you are telling the truth. this can not be true though?

have you used the bot and does it work? is the sign up bonus any good and can bots actually claim it? with christmas round the corner it may help someone out!

Quote

10-24-2011 , 07:00 PM

#384

ArtySmokes

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 6,999

I've not downloaded the bot, but others have listed plenty of confirmed bot accounts on the iPoker network for months.
I've not signed up with Will Hill or iPoker precisely because they tolerate bot-usage while saying otherwise.
Until iPoker cancels its affiliation with http://free-pokerbot-site.com/ and closes all the accounts of people who signed up to Will Hill via the links on that site, there's no way they're getting a single cent from me.

Quote

12-28-2011 , 05:30 PM

#385

filhodamae

centurion

Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 185

Quote:

Originally Posted by Olegz79

alavala, appollodor, beninnio, Huko34uk, zacharyas

I also wrote to support announcing 4 of them as bots, but they don't care.

Quote

12-29-2011 , 01:42 AM

#386

Shankybot dont buy

temp-banned

Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 8

If Ipoker would stop botters they would loose half of their costumers which also means loose half their rake so the ipoker skins have become so bot populated there will never really be anything done about it unless there is an extreme case that is super obvious 24hrs a day botter but as for the plain and simple obvious botter who bots 6 to 8 hours a day usually will never be banned unless they decide to make an example out of one like they are doing something about it but that is as far as it will ever go as long as there rake comes from 50% or more from bots and I am sure ythis has already been said!!!

Quote

01-03-2012 , 01:00 PM

#387

Iamcloud

grinder

Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 645

RIP poker..

Quote

04-12-2012 , 02:17 AM

#388

Helpme1

centurion

Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 132

ipoker doesnt care about bots and they dont allow rb. what's really the diff here? a player with rb is a player who generates rake!! im sure these bots have huge rb deals too.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 06:18 AM

#389

Maso777

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 6,962

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helpme1

ipoker doesnt care about bots and they dont allow rb. what's really the diff here? a player with rb is a player who generates rake!! im sure these bots have huge rb deals too.

Quote

04-12-2012 , 07:06 AM

#390

filhodamae

centurion

Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 185

Quote:

Originally Posted by datsmahname

Curious about some FL players on iPoker

Can someone investigate these players with PTR premium?

Players with suspect tendencies:

http://www.pokertableratings.com/ipo...earch/beninnio

http://www.pokertableratings.com/ipo...rch/appollodor

http://www.pokertableratings.com/ipo...search/alavala

http://www.pokertableratings.com/ipo...earch/Huko34uk

http://www.pokertableratings.com/ipo...arch/zacharyas

All 5 players show similar VPIP/PFR/3-bet and continuation bet tednencies.

All of them have extremely high hand volumes and long sessions, all but 1 is winning without rake back.

All Ipoker Skins Support that I have contacted for years, said, that these players aren't bots. I was playing alot of sessions with these guys and they are really suspect in my opinion.

Quote

04-13-2012 , 01:01 AM

#391

Helpme1

centurion

Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 132

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maso777

if they allow bots, y do they care about ppl getting RB?

Quote

04-13-2012 , 01:59 AM

#392

Bobo Fett

Carpe Diem

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 56,895

What does one have to do with the other?

Quote

04-14-2012 , 02:32 PM

#393

HsinYi

enthusiast

Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 87

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helpme1

ipoker doesnt care about bots and they dont allow rb. what's really the diff here? a player with rb is a player who generates rake!! im sure these bots have huge rb deals too.

I have no idea what you are trying to say here. What do bots have to do with rakeback?

Quote

04-15-2012 , 12:51 AM

#394

dgking111

journeyman

Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 369

Quote:

Originally Posted by HsinYi

I have no idea what you are trying to say here. What do bots have to do with rakeback?

i play here and so far im making 6bb/100 in rb this year so if i were a breakeven bot then i would still be getting a good winrate

Quote

04-17-2012 , 08:55 AM

#395

MomWasRight

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 372

bots can speak? that´s actually scary.
what did he say?

Quote

04-19-2012 , 07:32 AM

#396

MisoHoneySoup

journeyman

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 251

Their NV application has been delayed...

**Link removed at poster's request - see 2 posts down from here for new links**

Quote:

Nevada regulators are also interested in the company's business ties to Playtech, the Israeli online gambling company that is a joint venture with William Hill online. Playtech is 40 percent owned by its founder, Teddy Sagi, a Tel Aviv-born businessman who was convicted of fraud and bribery in 1996.

Last edited by Bobo Fett; 04-19-2012 at 08:22 AM.

Quote

04-19-2012 , 08:04 AM

#397

deathorglory0

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 4,462

^ I clicked that link and my anti virus flagged something or other from that web site

Quote

04-19-2012 , 08:08 AM

#398

MisoHoneySoup

journeyman

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 251

Quote:

Originally Posted by deathorglory0

^ I clicked that link and my anti virus flagged something or other from that web site

Mods, please remove the link to be safe, I'd be very surprised if there was something sinister, it was republished here from that site.

http://www.gpwa.org/article.asp?id=200679

http://siteinspector.comodo.com/public/reports/1628358

Nothing flagged there?