Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread [Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread

06-01-2017 , 10:00 AM
SportsBetting.ag down for me. Anyone else having problems with Chico right now?
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-01-2017 , 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deuce2High
SportsBetting.ag down for me. Anyone else having problems with Chico right now?
BoL is working don't have sportsbetting installed.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-01-2017 , 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop22
BoL is working don't have sportsbetting installed.
TY. Added more exceptions to firewall and a restart fixed it. Weird though.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-02-2017 , 07:36 PM
So, I was on the line with live chat the other day and complained that there are no turbo HUSNG's on this network. They agreed that this was perhaps a little behind the times. Today? Turbo HUSNG's have been added to the lineup of SNG's you can join. Less than 48 hours after I said something. That's pretty amazing.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-02-2017 , 09:03 PM
problem I have with there HUSNG lobby is that a new one doesnt spawn when someone regs like ignition and other sites. It really helps with game selection and doesnt force you to play reg vs reg all day.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-02-2017 , 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbustalotz
problem I have with there HUSNG lobby is that a new one doesnt spawn when someone regs like ignition and other sites. It really helps with game selection and doesnt force you to play reg vs reg all day.
+1. This is something else that needs to be addressed. Tons of reg v reg here although honestly, that's also just HUSNG's today.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-03-2017 , 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbustalotz
problem I have with there HUSNG lobby is that a new one doesnt spawn when someone regs like ignition and other sites. It really helps with game selection and doesnt force you to play reg vs reg all day.
this spawn thing would be good for any of there sngs really....been wondering about this with the hyper 6man sngs and even the DONs they have ...which i think the DONs shoudl be 6man but 8man just takes a little longer is all.......happy grinding!!!!

Last edited by Mike Haven; 06-03-2017 at 01:05 PM.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-03-2017 , 03:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirbustalotz
problem I have with there HUSNG lobby is that a new one doesnt spawn when someone regs like ignition and other sites. It really helps with game selection and doesnt force you to play reg vs reg all day.
They should also add a rematch option when a HUSNG ends. It's annoying when you want to play again w/the same opponent and the lobby's full or you simultaneously register with someone else before you can send an invite.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 12:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohpleez
this spawn thing would be good for any of there sngs really....been wondering about this with the hyper 6man sngs and even the DONs they have ...which i think the DONs shoudl be 6man but 8man just takes a little longer is all.......happy grinding!!!!
Does anybody that isn't playing for fun and actually trying to make money play their hypers? Aren't they 10% rake with 1 minute levels lol. I would assume the player pool is really soft, but still seems impossible to beat them.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David3
Does anybody that isn't playing for fun and actually trying to make money play their hypers? Aren't they 10% rake with 1 minute levels lol. I would assume the player pool is really soft, but still seems impossible to beat them.
The rake here + the lack of rake back is definitely an issue. Yes, the player base is soft, but it is also improving drastically as more players join the site, which is happening every day now. The fact is that on all US facing networks today, you have to absolutely CRUSH your opponents or you don't make any money. It's like we're playing on a different field.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 03:16 PM
Related to the last few posts: When hands like the one above are commonplace on this network, we want rake back, not useless VIP points. Cash games players like cash games. We like cash. We don't want points to join a 7 hour MTT. We want money to put in our pocket or our bankroll. Why the site would offer useless VIP points to cash players instead of doing what is expected (paying us 27-36% rake back) is pretty obvious and really disappointing.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 03:21 PM
Has anyone seen this error before when trying to log in?



any clue how to fix it?
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 04:04 PM
Another note: For some odd reason (or obvious to me) they don't have any 4NL 6max tables. Only this terrible, terrible full ring garbage. So, if you want to play 6max, you have to jump up to 10NL. The 4NL full ring tables are full of 8/3/0 nits and unless you just sit on AA or KK, you're almost always beat. This site sucks.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 05:26 PM
SharkHunter420 this does not belong in here. Post these in BBV.

I've literally played every micro/low stake climbing my way up on this site. I've never seen anything out of whack on this site with the RNG. Poker is hard these days and there's a high amount of variance at times. I'd be more than willing to analyze your database after you have 100,000 hands on the site.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharkHunter420
I've won 1 pot in 200 hands. The other guy at the tables who's just clearly better than everyone else is down about 4 BI's all the result to random crap hitting gold on the flop and river. This is beyond obvious, guys.
I believe you are in the wrong thread. Here you go: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28.../index832.html

Please stop posting very standard hands in this thread. Thanks.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by erroneous
I believe you are in the wrong thread. Here you go: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28.../index832.html

Please stop posting very standard hands in this thread. Thanks.
Guys calling huge pre 3b's and 4b's with T3o and the flop coming down T33 are anything but standard. That said, sure...I'll take it elsewhere.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 05:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharkHunter420
Guys calling huge pre 3b's and 4b's with T3o and the flop coming down T33 are anything but standard. That said, sure...I'll take it elsewhere.
You're playing the microstakes. Calling 3bets and 4bets with any two cards when it is only pennies to them is very common.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharkHunter420
Guys calling huge pre 3b's and 4b's with T3o and the flop coming down T33 are anything but standard. That said, sure...I'll take it elsewhere.
standard micro hands. lol sample sizes regarding your wins/losses.
tl:dr that's poker, get over it and stop posting.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 08:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCAChiTown
You're playing the microstakes. Calling 3bets and 4bets with any two cards when it is only pennies to them is very common.
Again, it adds up. Some of these guys are losing $50 a day @ 4NL.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-04-2017 , 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SharkHunter420
Again, it adds up. Some of these guys are losing $50 a day @ 4NL.
I've been playing on this site almost exclusively this year. I've played everything from 2NL and up. If the site was that tough/rigged I wouldn't play here.

The only big issue I have ever come across is the amount of botting and the site refusing to do anything about it.

Get yourself a significant sample size. Let's say 100,000 hands.(Yes. This will take a while.) Then get someone familiar with beating the microstakes to analyze your data.

If you'd like to continue voicing your displeasure with the variance please post in the BBV forum.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-05-2017 , 05:48 AM
just got one of those "may you please confirm your relationship with player xxx" emails when requesting my payout. Funnily enough, I have played a grand total of 0 hands with the player name provided to me.

I guess this is how they get around the "24 hour payout guarantee" when they have a backlog of cashouts. But perhaps they should "investigate" my relationship with a player i have actually played with!
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-05-2017 , 07:35 AM
I once got asked about my relationship with a player, they said 1 of the reasons was because our sn was similar, we both had AA somewhere in our name.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-05-2017 , 05:33 PM
the usually ask about relationships with players who are bots (because you are forced to play most of the hands with them due to 6-8 bots per limit )
and this is just ridiculous, why won't they do ANYTHING about the bots?
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-06-2017 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makati
the usually ask about relationships with players who are bots (because you are forced to play most of the hands with them due to 6-8 bots per limit )
and this is just ridiculous, why won't they do ANYTHING about the bots?
Perhaps some folks should start bombarding live chat about it.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote
06-06-2017 , 12:13 PM
Ok, let's get back on topic, was there any resolution to this money won from fraudulent account being confiscated issue?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aizack13
i asked him if he got a refund, he didn't get any email from them and doesn't know if they just refund him without telling him.
He needs to check the "history" transaction ledger within the software, or email support. This can't be that difficult to figure out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aizack13
Please be advised that these security measures are in place to protect all our players and our network from any unfair play. If funds are won from a fraudulent account, the winnings is returned to the fraud account and the account is then closed. If you lose to a fraudulent account, then the amount lost is returned to your account and the fraudulent account is closed.
Let's be real, if they're telling you this, it's pretty unlikely they're just straight up lying.
[Chico Network] BetOnline, Tiger, etc.: Unofficial Discussion Thread Quote

      
m