Hi David,

I am very happy to say I qualified for UO Bucharest last Sunday and I hope to see you there! I got the final ticket from the Davitsche League, so thanks for running these great extra twitch promo's!

Also, could you please extend 5x100UK tickets?
Alias: Remk_95
Thanks in advance!

Tikiet pliiz?

Hey David,

It was really great to see the challenges for the 5 seaters being improved (to 3 levels), but maybe the 2 seaters should get back to 2 levels for the challenges.
After playing a lot of those the past few days (en yesterday for the most) i found that I almost never reached level 3 before the end, and that it was very exceptional to reach level 4. (on almost 70 euro played yesterday I don't know if I was even close to raking back what I would have raked with the same amount in mtts)

Maybe it's obvious to change these back to 2 levels (and increase the points) since your starting stack is the half of that in a 5 seater.

At least. That's what I experienced

EDIT: I have to say that I overestimated the rake (tought it was more than 3%) Still I think my point stands. Just not as extreme as mentioned above. So yesterday I played 121 euro in heads-ups. Accumulating 3,63 euro in rake. I completed 500 challenge points (5 euro) but the first two challenges I finished were already done for 4/5+ I think. So it's way more close, but reducing it to 2 levels again would still seem a good choice

No.. 3 is good. Just cause you had really fast ones , doesn't mean we all do.

Hi david,
I won a unibetopen package for Bucharest, but I have an exam to do 4th of december. Do you have information swapping packages to a later event. And is there more information about the upcoming unibet open events in 2018?

Do you have that many heads-up sit and go's that last longer than level 3?

For the 5 seaters the 3 should stay (I wouldn't even mind another level). But it's non-logical to make it the same amount of levels for both if you start in the one with 1k chips and in the other with 2k

I disagree with you, most of my games take's longer than 3 levels ( Higher limits/ reg v reg )and i play them a lot 50-100 per day.

Okay I see. I play 10 and lower. Maybe that's the difference... I understand that higher stakes can take longer.
Yet I still think there should be a difference between 2 and 5 seats... 5 seats take way longer (again, because of double stack and more players)

Or heads-up sit and go's should get 2k starting stacks (maybe 1500 will even do)At level 3 the average is only 20bb. And at level 6 only 10 bb

Tbh I think challenges for Sngs should be done away with or make them pre flop challenges that players have no control over. I.e be dealt AA or be dealt suited connectors.

I would like the challenges to be valid for as many levels of the SNG as possible, as its frustrating when something happens that would fulfil the condition of a challenge but its not valid as we are too late in the tournaments.

However from Andrew's posts ITT we learnt that from Unibet's perspective its not just a question of how long "most" SNGs last, the reason they only let the challenges run as long as they do is so as not to advantage or disadvantage particular players who get to see more levels on average - in the case of 5-max they're particularly worried about "fish" getting knocked out early and getting less chance to be dealt hands and thereby getting less "rakeback" despite paying the same rake.

I don't know enough about HU to say but I imagine their data shows that some people have different average lengths of tournaments but if you cap the long ones at 3 levels then the average is close enough to the same.

^^^^
I've always thought challenges should be random (based on what you get preflop) or structured in a way to encourage better play (e.g., 3bet AA KK etc, fold 72 preflop)

Is there an option to tile multiple windows in the browser version? If not can this be done?

can i have a statement from an unibet reg playing lowstakes why he is engaging in these 4 handed reg battles on this high raking site?

Cheers

Hi Dave my user ID is Fus3rr.

I am a new depositor, i didn't really know what i was doing on unidays and i have had 4, 4 euro tickets expired. Would you be able to refresh them? Someone told me to come here.

Thanks a lot.

James

Like playing without a HUD, like being treated by respect by the company. Both of those mean less stress.

But I'm a reg not a pro (i.e. I regularly withdraw but its not what I feed my family with). Probably a pro could make more money elsewhere using 3rd party software against sportsbook fish.

Also what is lowstakes? I play SNG25 (and higher if it runs) also NL50 and a bit of Banzai to fill in gaps. If you mean lower than that i.e. microstakes well the rake at NL4 and NL10 isn't high at all.

You can multiple table but they are stacked and you can change tables by the card icons in the top left of the window.

If I remember correctly because of the way the browser version works its not possible to have separate windows for each table.

Should be the other way round if anything, 3b 72o would be great for the games.

I think Andrew said that they would be hostages to what various companies were going to do with the next version of Chrome/IE/Firefox, playing catchup, and it would be difficult to get all the browser windows to talk to each other.

With lowstakes i mean NL50+ where on unibet the rake seems to be the highest out of all internet poker networks i know of ( 6% capped at 3 euroes compared to the standard 5% ).
Also the lack of fish and heavy 4 handed reg battles in these stakes ( why are they even playing ) make these games unbeatable

My card withdrawals are taking 3 days instead of the usual 2 lately, has something changed on Uni's side or is it the other party?

^^^^
Are you the kind of guy that also yells at microwave ovens to hurry up?

Well pretty much what I said above then. The games aren't unbeatable but I know I could make more on another site. The thing is I don't want to faff around with 3rd party software and I like being addressed as an intelligent adult by the representatives of the company ITT.

But then I'm a reg not a pro. I don't think many full-time pros do play on the site - they could beat us regs even without their software but of course not for as much as they could beat the fish on other sites while using software. I would still recommend Unibet to a recreational player though - they're going to lose their money whatever but at least its on a level playing field in a straight up game on Unibet.

I'm not your guy, buddy!

We're all bros though right?