RE: Ladbrokes(something dodgy)! - Internet Poker

Two Plus Two Forums Online Poker Sites & Marketplaces Online Poker Sites Discussion of Poker Sites

RE: Ladbrokes(something dodgy)!

Post Reply Subscribe

...

07-17-2011 , 12:02 PM

Vulpes33

stranger

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 7

Hi peeps hope ive got the right area for this thread.

Heres the situation, i was playing in a game last night on ladbrokes and afterwards as usual i went back and studied the hand history as its players i play regular in a private game. Then i came across this hand which im 1 gizzilian % sure it should of been a splitpot but according to the hand replay i lost the hand.

I was unaware of it at the time coz i was playing over 8 tables and didnt take as much notice as i should of.

http://www.pokerhandreplays.com/view.php/id/3521999

Quote

07-17-2011 , 12:09 PM

LTT777

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,264

yup, very much a split pot....also strangely there is 675 in the pot after you call pre flop (should be 500). It says you called 250 but you had 375 in the pot. As in you called a small blind plus another big blind. I thought maybe the replayer missed the antes or something but I found nothing there about antes. Either that replayer is incorrect on more than one level or you got completely raped by ladbrokes.

Not sure what to do about it but I hope it gets resolved.

Quote

07-17-2011 , 12:14 PM

AlcoholProof

enthusiast

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 94

Ladbrokes is a **** joke mate. Software sucks, support are ******s and promotions are the worst. Rigged IMO.

Quote

07-17-2011 , 12:15 PM

Vulpes33

stranger

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 7

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTT777

I definitly remember there been an ante. Ive sent the hand number off to ladbrokes for them to investigate. Just wanted to make sure i wasnt missing something before looking a fool

Quote

07-17-2011 , 12:31 PM

LTT777

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 1,264

If there was an ante the numbers still don't add up. There are 4 players at the table and the ante would be 125 (coincidentally the same as the small blind). There is no even numbered ante that makes 125 with 2 players. Plus by the replayer, it has your small blind in then you add an additional big blind. Numbers don't add up other than you got ****ed.

Quote

07-17-2011 , 02:16 PM

Big Mack

journeyman

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 387

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlcoholProof

Ladbrokes is a **** joke mate. Software sucks, support are ******s and promotions are the worst. Rigged IMO.

Ur ridiculous.

OP, just send an email to Ladbrokes and I'm 100% confident they'll sort you out.

Quote

07-19-2011 , 07:30 AM

Vulpes33

stranger

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 7

Thanks for the replies guys/gals. Ive had a reply back from ladbrokes with a run down of the hand and who got paid and aparantly they say it was definitly split in the game and that the hand replay software must have a fault with it.

Conclusion= dont trust hand replayers

Quote

07-19-2011 , 08:08 AM

never forgive

centurion

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 169

So you say you had the correct number of chips in front of you after the hand, even though the software showed the chips going to the other player?

Quote

07-19-2011 , 12:31 PM

Andyfothershops

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,283

Is the network covered by PTR? It might be worth looking this one up, or asking if any of the other players at the table are 2 + 2 ers. Check their data if so.

Quote

07-19-2011 , 04:36 PM

#10

Andyfothershops

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,283

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andyfothershops

Is the network covered by PTR? It might be worth looking this one up, or asking if any of the other players at the table are 2 + 2 ers. Check their data if so.

Found out , it's on prima network. I couldnt find the hand unfortunately. Does OP have the hand in HEM or PT3? Is it correct there, or did the replayer just duplicate what's recorded?

Quote

Post Reply Subscribe

...