Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010]

03-02-2010 , 04:15 PM
I am reading some messages on thoughts of suspect Poker Sites.

Fine, people post complaints, laments, and such and such.

PEOPLE respond with graphical representations of VARIANCE, good and fine.

But why the hostile and juvenile actions.

Calling persons RIGTARD, a slur against the mentally deficient. I never knew a Handicaped person to play poker, and surely they would get it in with THE WORST HAND, not the best. And if they had the best and lost they would throw a tantrum the same as if they lost with the worst. THIS IS NOT THE CASE with those slandered RIGTARD.

Calling them, delusional, fine yes.

Calling the defenders of the SITES shills, perfectly understandable.

In fact logic dictates that these Sites would have employes hired to do just that. Anyone who thinks Different is stck in the classroom and void of any cutthroat business experience.



Here is my final thought.

It is not RIGGED.

Some are lucky to begin, as countless Famous player have sugsted.

THey say, you have "RUN HOT" to start. Etc. Mr Lederer who frequented the backamon club and WAS not lucky to begin with has said as much as have others.

LUCK or PERSONAL variance what ever you call it, is not unreal.

So those who complain simply are either BAD, and do not know it. OR are running BAD over an incredible long sample.

BUT HERE is the question:

If you run bad to start, you will either stop playing, or continue.

If you continue you might get the turn around, NO? But you might simply continue to run bad. To sugest you must Play "through" this bad is conceptually fine, but PRACTICALLY wrong.


Two statements, but I think the juvenile hostile name calling undermines legitimate thought and speak.

I have no idea if those who Stand so strongly in support of the sites are employed by them, or If those who are claiming illegitimate dealings are poor players or legitimate suffers of bad beats. I simply want good evidence theory one way or the other.

Thank you.

As a note:

I was a winner in SIT and Go's with a high ROI. Low stakes, of course. But I was winner. My personal notes suggest that numbers did not match, but I was winning, so I did not care.

IN cash I am break even, sleight loser.


I do not consider myself a mule, though others might disagree.

Last edited by Mr. Giblet; 03-02-2010 at 04:17 PM. Reason: remove offensive term in event this might warent the supression of my thought
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:20 PM
  • Poker is a game of skill.
  • Roulette is a game of chance.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:24 PM
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:28 PM
there was some fear. Some years ago, in some circles, that the mind was regressing in man.

Simply stated, they believe that because of technology, the brain is regressing.

As is seen and evidenced here, they would be pleased.

Photos of Cartoons, Random Nonsense. Half Words.

The phrase TLDR which i found out meant TOO LONG DID NOT READ?

Too Long? Really, a paragraph.

Yes, simple minds.

Post some more cartoons and funny photos and amuse yourself onto sleep.

Also, I never play Roulette. Various reasons, not the least is which the numbers are oriented to a strange thing.

A man who was well schooled in Kabbalistic Mysticism mentioned this to me, I was shocked and did not believe, but there might be something there. Of course, he was obsessed with numbers, so there is that.


However my point is being taken of topic by the thin minds running wild here.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:30 PM
mr. giblet - I'm going to tell you something that I think you deserve to know: Nobody understands pretty much anything you ever say.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Giblet
I am reading some messages on thoughts of suspect Poker Sites.

Fine, people post complaints, laments, and such and such.

PEOPLE respond with graphical representations of VARIANCE, good and fine.

But why the hostile and juvenile actions.

Calling persons RIGTARD, a slur against the mentally deficient. I never knew a Handicaped person to play poker, and surely they would get it in with THE WORST HAND, not the best. And if they had the best and lost they would throw a tantrum the same as if they lost with the worst. THIS IS NOT THE CASE with those slandered RIGTARD.

Calling them, delusional, fine yes.

Calling the defenders of the SITES shills, perfectly understandable.

In fact logic dictates that these Sites would have employes hired to do just that. Anyone who thinks Different is stck in the classroom and void of any cutthroat business experience.



Here is my final thought.

It is not RIGGED.

Some are lucky to begin, as countless Famous player have sugsted.

THey say, you have "RUN HOT" to start. Etc. Mr Lederer who frequented the backamon club and WAS not lucky to begin with has said as much as have others.

LUCK or PERSONAL variance what ever you call it, is not unreal.

So those who complain simply are either BAD, and do not know it. OR are running BAD over an incredible long sample.

BUT HERE is the question:

If you run bad to start, you will either stop playing, or continue.

If you continue you might get the turn around, NO? But you might simply continue to run bad. To sugest you must Play "through" this bad is conceptually fine, but PRACTICALLY wrong.


Two statements, but I think the juvenile hostile name calling undermines legitimate thought and speak.

I have no idea if those who Stand so strongly in support of the sites are employed by them, or If those who are claiming illegitimate dealings are poor players or legitimate suffers of bad beats. I simply want good evidence theory one way or the other.

Thank you.

As a note:

I was a winner in SIT and Go's with a high ROI. Low stakes, of course. But I was winner. My personal notes suggest that numbers did not match, but I was winning, so I did not care.

IN cash I am break even, sleight loser.


I do not consider myself a mule, though others might disagree.
tl;dr

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Giblet
there was some fear. Some years ago, in some circles, that the mind was DE-Volving in man.

Simply staed, they believe that because of technology, the brain is regressing.

As is seen and evidenced here, they would be pleased.

Photos of Cartoons, Random Nonssnse. Half Words.

The phrase TLDR which i found out meant TOO LONG DID NOT READ?

Too Long? Really, a paragraph.

Yes, simple minds.

Post some more cartoons and funny photos and amuse yourself onto sleep.
tl;dr
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:37 PM
I'm here from downtown. I'm here from Mitch and Murray. And I'm here on a mission of mercy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-AXTx4PcKI
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riggermortis
gold
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:46 PM
Thank you to MICROBOB, the only man to write an actuall statment.

I am trying to be as Clear as I can.

My second statement, on the roulette wheel was in response to a character who has tried to Drive me off statement.

This, having read on those who have participated in intellectual diversion in various spheres of influence, is a well known tactic which can BE employed and entrusted to the most basic person.

It is a way to subvert and move the conversation to another thing.

O am not attempting to do this, others are.

Please only respond if you have something to offer on what I say.

I do not add simpleton remarks in the topics I have no opinion towards..

Thank you.

Also, I read that Play before you saw the movie while eating your Cherished cereal and smoking the Mind altering substance.

DO not quote Mamet to me, my friend.

Go find me a buffalo nickle while your at it.

Last edited by Mr. Giblet; 03-02-2010 at 04:49 PM. Reason: i might have misintentionaly insulted someone so I remove statement.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:49 PM
Would it be fair to summarise your comments as:

Quote:
1) Some people call each other nasty names on 2p2

2) Online poker is generally fair

3) Some people get lucky and some people get unlucky
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroBob
mr. giblet - I'm going to tell you something that I think you deserve to know: Nobody understands pretty much anything you ever say.

LOL I don't understand anything he writes but I love his threads for some reason

Mr. Giblet for mod

ACE ACE EVerYone Else is a MUle
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:53 PM
Josem,

Thank you for a serious reply.

Vaugly, yes.

But,

Why, the anger and hostility towards this TOPIC in particular.

There are many young men/woman and perhaps NOT so young who are making a fine amount of money.

So obviously they do not suspect it as dealing a dirty deal? BUt why do some, some who are either Winners, or Breakeve, or more strangly, NOT PLAYERS, attack with such venom those who speak question and TRUTH and Rumor?

What is their agenda and why is their goal?

The phrase that is applicable to the concept and question of cheating SITES and suspect RNG....cui bono

Is also applicable here and to this, no?

WHY the hostility.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:53 PM
I was beginning to think Mr.Giblet wasn't leveling everyone and didn't know any better, looks like I was wrong
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:53 PM
Quote:
I do not add simpleton remarks in the topics I have no opinion towards..

Thank you.

Also, I read that Play before you saw the movie while eating your Cherished cereal and smoking the Mind altering substance.

DO not quote Mamet to me, my friend.

Go find me a buffalo nickle while your at it.

Your attempts to make any kind of sense at all have failed miserably.
Like the other poster mentioned though, I too find you to be highly amusing through the unintended hilarity of your posting style.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamPro
I was beginning to think Mr.Giblet wasn't leveling everyone and didn't know any better, looks like I was wrong

yeah, I'm pretty sure you're right. willing to go along with him for now though due to the entertainment value.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:58 PM
i cry with laughter every time
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Giblet
Thank you to MICROBOB, the only man to write an actuall statment.

I am trying to be as Clear as I can.

My second statement, on the roulette wheel was in response to a character who has tried to Drive me off statement.

This, having read on those who have participated in intellectual diversion in various spheres of influence, is a well known tactic which can BE employed and entrusted to the most basic person.

It is a way to subvert and move the conversation to another thing.

O am not attempting to do this, others are.

Please only respond if you have something to offer on what I say.

I do not add simpleton remarks in the topics I have no opinion towards..

Thank you.

Also, I read that Play before you saw the movie while eating your Cherished cereal and smoking the Mind altering substance.

DO not quote Mamet to me, my friend.

Go find me a buffalo nickle while your at it.

Last edited by Riggermortis; 03-02-2010 at 04:59 PM. Reason: Expect to be levelled when you level others YOURSELF
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 04:59 PM
If you are serious Mr.Giblet then I'll answer your question, the reason most ppl are losers is b/c they can't handle the swings of winning and losing. They don't understand that poker is about the longterm.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 05:00 PM
Is there a reason no one will answer my statement,

The fact that people keep driving me off my originaly statement and require me to answer off point concersation is NOT my fauly.

Look at other message I have had, I only answer people with other topics when THEY INTRODUCE THEM.

The fact is, I DID NOT mention DAVID MAMET, ROULETTE< or any other thing.

I might have been out of ordder in sugesting that the young man had not read the play, and was doing what I sugest, But I have not been locked in an Ivory tower and know what I know.

Also, I do not know why anything I have said Is HIGHLY amusing, but we have different sense of humor.

Perhaps, the problem is I am dealing with much younger persons, hence my suggestion of CEREAL and the rest.


Also, you are using tems I do not know.

I had to look up most of this slang.

I am not TROLL.
I have no idea what a DONOUGHT refers to still.

I am not a Turkey, Goblin.

I am not Leveling or a Level, I am unclear as to that means.

ON point.

The response to me has come from:

A cat with a machine gun.

A cat with a cast.

A soccer player.

Photos of some man in a car convulsing/laughing?

I think that yes, we share different culture referents and I am funny. Fine, ok.

Last edited by Mr. Giblet; 03-02-2010 at 05:05 PM.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Giblet
Is there a reason no one will answer my statement,

The fact that people keep driving me off my originaly statement and require me to answer off point concersation is NOT my fauly.

Look at other message I have had, I only answer people with other topics when THEY INTRODUCE THEM.

The fact is, I DID NOT mention DAVID MAMET, ROULETTE< or any other thing.

I might have been out of ordder in sugesting that the young man had not read the play, and was doing what I sugest, But I have not been locked in an Ivory tower and know what I know.

Also, I do not know why anything I have said Is HIGHLY amusing, but we have different sense of humor.

Perhaps, the problem is I am dealing with much younger persons, hence my suggestion of CEREAL and the rest.
Ok I will answer it in the form you ask it.

Sometimes when you gamble you have to take chance. When 5 high isn't good enough maybe 3 high is. Sometimes you have to push with 5 of a kind and get the guy to fold his 2345 triple suited. When he checks, you stand up, take off your shirt and say...I know u be bluffin...sit back down and fold like a man. When flipping a coin, you can expect it to land on one side. Sometimes you can guess the side, sometimes you cannot. The best thing to do is reraise the coin all in and celebrate when it lands on a moose.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 05:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Giblet

Also, I do not know why anything I have said Is HIGHLY amusing
Well, there was this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Giblet
Perhaps, the problem is I am dealing with much younger persons, hence my suggestion of CEREAL and the rest.
Then this almost entirely nonsensical statement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Giblet
I am not TROLL.
I have no idea what a DONOUGHT refers to still.

I am not a Turkey, Goblin.

I am not Leveling or a Level, I am unclear as to that means.
Both highly amusing. A+

Last edited by xxMaquiladoraxx; 03-02-2010 at 05:06 PM. Reason: Mr. Giblet for best gimmick ever
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riggermortis
Ok I will answer it in the form you ask it.

Sometimes when you gamble you have to take chance. When 5 high isn't good enough maybe 3 high is. Sometimes you have to push with 5 of a kind and get the guy to fold his 2345 triple suited. When he checks, you stand up, take off your shirt and say...I know u be bluffin...sit back down and fold like a man. When flipping a coin, you can expect it to land on one side. Sometimes you can guess the side, sometimes you cannot. The best thing to do is reraise the coin all in and celebrate when it lands on a moose.

damn I almost leveled myself by posting a serious response to this gibberish
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 05:09 PM
I have been called the following in my time here:

TROLL. TURKEY. GIMICK. DONOUGHT. ******. RIGTARD. CRAZY.
MOD. Idiot. And assorted nonsense.

Its what they use to call the dozens, yes.

But listen, I am not participating. I think it is in fine and good jest, then I have no problem. BUt to continue on with it is not legitimate if it is in malice.

Also, I think the response I have received, are quite interesting.

My self has been attacked.?

I doubt that in person I would be spoken to as such. But perhaps I am wrong.


The fact that I am new to No Limit and am looking to learn does not mean I am simple or ignorant to most/all things.

Simply put. I have not the inclination/desire to go and learn your strange insult/put down slang. So i laugh and let it slide off.


But when It interferes in posting of messages, I take offense.

And listen, someone makes a comment, I come with a rebuttal? Understand?
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 05:10 PM
wait a second...... wat?
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote
03-02-2010 , 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Giblet
I have been called the following in my time here:

TROLL. TURKEY. GIMICK. DONOUGHT. ******. RIGTARD. CRAZY.
MOD. Idiot. And assorted nonsense.

Its what they use to call the dozens, yes.

But listen, I am not participating. I think it is in fine and good jest, then I have no problem. BUt to continue on with it is not legitimate if it is in malice.

Also, I think the response I have received, are quite interesting.

My self has been attacked.?

I doubt that in person I would be spoken to as such. But perhaps I am wrong.
Sometimes you have to recognize things aren't always as they seem. Take for instance when you stare into a mirror. Sometimes the mirror is a pivot into the past and more times then not, it is just asking a question about profanity. Take a valcano for example. If you anger it, it will rumble, if you poke it and may rumble louder. Point being, life is like a game of chess and we are all checker boards.
A question on Tone of argument located here, in  regards the Taboo topic. [2010] Quote

      
m