Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Keith
At some point you have to trust the operator. Nobody in the industry has done more to deserve trust than the Stars Group, from winning regulated licenses, passing audits and certifications, helping to refund players of competitors, and focusing on game integrity as one of our core principles (we have a whole department working on it full time).
I had no problem trusting PS in the past, but recent changes don't inspire trust overall.
Get your rake, let the game be, treat everyone the same, let the best player win - that was the company I put my trust in, but your management has already openly stated that winning players are not very welcome at PS and chests are nothing else, but an attempt to 'level the playing field'. So you are no longer treating everyone the same, it is no longer a part of company core values. If your mgmt is straight up segregating players in media interviews then I'm sure this mindset goes from the top all the way down and is now a part of business, product owners meeting, technical design and so on, implications of this on the game are unknown for us, maybe the chests are the end of it, maybe not, but the trust ship has sailed imho.
As far as I remember a few years back PartyPoker was quietly segregating players seating regs and recreationals separately on different tables. Of course nobody in the players community even thought about such a possibility until somebody started to get suspicious and asked some questions eventually making Party to admit it. I am not saying it was malicious on Party side, probably just an attempt to 'improve the game'.
It is a common knowledge in software development that when you are implementing a new feature, even if it is a complicated functionality, you want the user experience to be simple, the user needs to know right away how to use it. I can imagine this is even more true in a gambling software which is essentially in business of fun. And then you guys come up with chests where even regs have trouble understanding the logic of how this works, let alone casual players. Now it is either you guys have a terrible product team (which I doubt) or there is something else going on.
Licenses, audits, certifications - these are all buzz words that can be thrown right and left, but without knowing exactly how the process looks like, what was audited, who did that, was it planned or without notice, which components, how are these sw components connected etc. without all of this these words are as good as simply saying 'just trust us'.
Refunding players of competitors... we both know you guys made refunds because you made your calculations and were sure that in a long term this is gonna be EV+ for you by players coming back into ecosystem, PR-wise or else... this maybe good for some marketing materials, but let's not insult our intelligence here.
Bottom line is, I don't think you guys can appeal to players' trust anymore. It's not the world we live in anymore with corporations like Facebook or Google spying on own users or misusing private data. There is a multi-billion dollars blockchain technology movement happening right now which is going to fix that very problem and remove the need for 'trust' altogether, and yes, there will be decentralized, open-source poker solutions too.
What would it take for you to bring back the possibility of observing spinngo tables? For the reasons I mentioned in my previous post these games are now a black-box, sharkscope like tools are not able to track these games, so it is impossible to verify if these games are running as expected. I know this feature was disabled at community's request in the past, but times has changed, we need as much transparency as we can get.