Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleD
I'm not putting words into your mouth. Your position is that lower stakes games are raked relatively higher than higher stakes games, and that that is wrong. Stars has to make money somehow, and they are not going to cut into their bottom line. So if you want to decrease the rake at lower stakes the only way to counteract that is to increase the take at higher stakes. You can't have it both ways.
You have always been basically saying that it's wrong that people at mid stakes pay more rake in bb/100 than people at high stakes. Yet now in this SNG scenario your position is that since it costs the same for stars to run a 2 minute 3k hyper as a 2 minute 5$ hyper, it's wrong for Stars to charge so much more in dollar amounts for the 3k hyper. Do you realize that these two positions contradict each other?
Thanks for posting this. It's frustrating I've done such an apparently poor job of expression my position, at least from what you've read. My sole interest here is in having a healthy poker economy, for all stakes. Although I have used very high stakes to illustrate exactly how much rake lower stakes players pay, I ultimately could not care less if certain stakes or games are more favorable value wise than others. A point I've mentioned multiple times is that high stakes revenue is largely irrelevant. You can see that data here:
http://www.buyhands.com/blog/rake-top-100/ Stars didn't recently increase the Stars high stakes rake for any sake of fairness or balance, they increased high stakes rake solely out of greed. And the whole player representatives thing gave them an opportunity to try to use lower stakes players as a scape goat to avoid taking much heat for their own greed from higher stakes players.
I do agree that Stars has to make money somehow. However, many people are leaving this game because of the excessive rake. I don't even mean regulars who consciously leave because they go from winners to rakeback pros or even small losers. I am talking about casual players. Imagine a casual player who does well in his home game and decides to go fire up some microstakes PLO online. He earns 10bb/100 pre rake - that is a huge earn rate. Unfortunately for him Stars charges 20+bb/100 in rake at microstakes PLO. He is going to feel like he's outplaying his opponents, will indeed be outplaying his opponents, he's going to get it good - and hold. Yet somehow, he's going to be losing at 10bb/100. Dropping a buyin every 1000 hands, a bankroll every month - all the while constantly outplaying his opponents. How long do you think this player is going to stick around? No, he's going to end up quitting or even here:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...dition-255990/ If you ask him why he quit the last thing he'd ever mention would be those few cents to couple of bucks that were charged every pot.
When people stop using your product because it's too expensive, what do you do? According to Stars you make it even more expensive for the remaining few regular customers. They obviously believe that online poker has all but completely price inelastic demand. When the games are good, they are probably right. But the games aren't good, and they are taking a dangerously long time to adjust. With the current state of the games I feel that favorable adjustments to their rake structures would not only generally be favorable to players, but ultimately to Stars as well.