Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Dylan
Hi all,
I understand the skepticism and expect you to each draw your own conclusions on Stars Rewards, but I wanted to share a few notes from my side as the program is still new to New Jersey and this may provide a bit of context on our perspective:
-The majority of the NJ playerbase will be receiving more with Stars Rewards than the previous VIP Club. This is especially true if they play more than just poker (Sports or Casino). If you are a higher-volume winning poker player, you'll be getting less and I appreciate the above isn't much consolation if you're in this group. It's worth noting that when you first join Stars Rewards, you start on the lowest Chest level (red Chest) but as you move up Chest levels, your rewards on average increase. So it may take a week or two until you get to the Chest level that's indicative of your volume of play.
-As others in the thread have noted, we don't advertise rakeback percentages; that's because Stars Rewards isn't a traditional rakeback program. It's designed to allocate rewards based on your profile which includes criteria such as net deposits and the types of games you play. So one player to the next may be receiving a different amount of rewards depending on their profile. The rewards themselves are personalised to be relevant to the games that you play. For example MTT players will receive primarily Tournament Tickets & Tournament Money, a sports-bettor will receive mostly Free Bets, and so forth, as well as everyone receiving a mix of StarsCoin & cash.
-What we've seen with Stars Rewards in the ROW is that there is a high-level of engagement with the program and players open their Chests and use the rewards inside at a rate that exceeded our highest expectations. Again, I appreciate that most in this thread would probably prefer a traditional rakeback program, but our learnings with Stars Rewards have been that most of our players, who are primarily casual players, want a loyalty program that rewards all of their activity, is easy to understand, gives rewards relevant to them, and offers the chance to win something meaningful. Stars Rewards aims to address these points.
That being said, we'll be monitoring the program closely and will make changes and adjustments as needed for the New Jersey market. Feedback & suggestions are always appreciated and I'll continue to monitor this thread.
Thanks,
Dylan
i know you're just a CS rep, so its not like you personally made these decisions, but thats a load of BS. and its pretty easy to see why with the following line of questioning.... its not like supernovas were even all grinders, people playing on a somewhat regular basis could achieve it.
- why does increasing the RB of casual players mean you have to cut current supernovas RB?
- why does rewarding casino gamblers or sports bettors mean you have to cut supernova RB?
- why does increasing the rewards for net depositors mean you have to cut SN RB?
- why does switching to a chest system which rewards based off of game type one plays mean you cut ones effective RB for SN players?
- why does adding a "jackpot" element to chests mean the EV rakeback for SN has to be cut?
seems incredibly disingenuous to say that people are upset over the change to a personalized chest system when its pretty clear people are upset over the change to the EV rakeback %...
obviously people are going to use non cash rewards at a higher rate since they actually want to extract the equity of their prize....
its pretty clear this is just a blatant cash grab in the form of a big "**** you" towards anyone who plays regularly on the site, conceived by some corporate higher up, in order to make more money in the short term.
can't really imagine whomever thought it would be a good idea to apply the same exact ROW rewards system to the NJ market where Pokerstars does not have anywhere close to the market share needed to pull this type of gimmick. regs are more gamestarters on PS NJ rather than mindless mass multitablers, and its hard for games to start under high rake. not even the nightly 100 starts every day...
while "protecting the ecosystem" is the mantra of the poker industry nowadays, imposing table limits or stake limits (such as can't sit more than 2 different limits per format) for cash would do infinite more good for that goal in the NJ ecosystem than rakeback changes. just objectively observing the cash lobby and seeing 500-1000NL regs sitting 50NL seems more cancerous to the health of the game than RB%.
while i doubt you'll answer this quesiton, what reasons do you think someone new to poker would actually choose to play on Stars over Party or WSOP?
at the end of the day, the proof will be in the pudding when Amaya's next fiscal report gets released. the last report showed stagnation in the NJ market, and this was corporate's genius solution to that...
Since I know im ranting at a wall, who if does decide to respond will just nicely tell me to go **** myself, here are some Post Rant Suggestions that perhaps you could actually do:
1) can you guys make the Thursday Thrill a re-entry tournament already for at least 2 hours?
2) can you guys bring back the Nightly 100 second chance? its massively overlayed twice mid october because the dumb site glitched out twice ending the registration period like 20 minutes into the tournament when registration is normally like 2:30 hours. perhaps fix the glitch????
3) can you remove the Big 50 from the schedule or change the starting time? it never runs because no one in NJ wants to start their session at 6 pm when all the main nightly stuff across all sites begin at 7pm? I would recommend just removing the big 50 from the schedule and adding a daily $50 PKO RENTRY tourney starting at 9 PM.