Quote:
Originally Posted by imaiden
You keep mentioning how the graphics card is the most important part of a setup, I am simply showing that it can be run well even with a weaker graphics card.
Sub performance? All runs smooth (at 60 fps, it's set to default in the options for multi) which is all I need really.
1070 is unnecessary.
Well, players are free to decide for themselves on which PC to spend their money on, from your advice, my advice, and the experience of anyone else posting here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fossilkid93
Yes, but judging by the comments in this thread you would have been led to believe that 3 emulators isn't possible on a basic laptop like mine so I'm still a bit skeptical. I guess 8 might be stretching it, but I could see 5-6 emulators being possible on a 1.2k machine.
As I mentioned in the post repeated below, and echoing what Tim just said, 2-3 emulators should be fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeleaB
...you can get away with a pretty basic laptop if you're only running a couple of emulators. And, as far as crappy PCs go, the big plus with PokerBros compared with other emulator-based apps is that you can play up to 4 tables per emulator- so even with a Commodore 64 you can still squeeze in 8 tables.
----------------------------------------------
At the end of the day, you basically have two types of poker players- players who make a profit and players who play for fun. If they're a semi-pro+, why skimp on what is basically not much more than a single buy-in at 200NL (eBay) to [usually] dramatically improve their work environment.