As expected, not much in the way of intelligent response.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roy_miami
There used to be 500 players sitting (out) at $2knl now there are 0 sitting, therefore the poker ecology has been destroyed. Is that your logic?
Normally I wouldn't waste my breathe responding to a half-wit troll, but there's an important fact here. If your number "500" is at all accurate, with 888's 6-table cap, that's a minimum of 84 sharks waiting for 1 fish. This is not a healthy ecosystem regardless of any table starting policies or software that is implemented. Of course, I know you're exaggerating, but a while back there was a screenshot showing 80 players sitting out = at least 14 sharks. The sharks can swim at the surface at 5/6 tables or lurk in deeper water with only 1 showing its ugly self, but it doesn't change the fundamental ratio and the fact that the environment is unhealthy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirbynator
he legitimately has no other argument against their new policy which has been great for the highstakes PLO tables so far.
Not only are you incapable of making a logical argument, you don't read well, or, more likely, you instantly dismiss anything that you read that you can't reconcile with your distorted view of reality.
The policy forces players to play HU at a 6-max table at a site which had the wisdom to shut down its HU tables. Of course you think this is great. Fact is, there are players who would play at a full table who will avoid playing HU. Surprises me that 888 would, in effect, bring back HU tables, even forcing unwilling players to play HU.
Also, we know that it's a policy that is being applied at the site's discretion, and we have had enough experience with how 888 uses its discretion.