Quote:
Originally Posted by Sideline
WSOP Nevada seems fine in these reguards right now. The Nevada Gambling statute 465.075, that predates online gambling, forbids HUDS or bots and actually makes them a felony.
Since the ecosystem seems good right now, I doubt it would suddenly be overrun by bots if the number of players doubled.
I predict the Nevada Gaming Board will make any site in Nevada that shares players with New Jersey ban HUDS, though they might just clarify that the statute doesn't apply to HUDs online. I don't think they will be able to ban them in Nevada but allow them in New Jersey if the players are playing vs each other.
You don’t think making the player pool all of a sudden 5x larger will incentivize those looking to make money?
As for 465.075, I know that wsop has interpreted it to mean they shouldn’t allow huds, however upon reading the actual regulation it seems to not apply to huds. I’d like to see a knowledgeable site interpret this law and see what conclusion they come to, as if you actually understand huds it seems to not apply.
Finally, this is not a hud debate. I’m not asking for huds in nv, what I want is written hand histories. Written hh are the safeguard players have against being cheated in the games.
Plus, Nothing is stopping the sites from supplying written hand histories while still maintaining that huds are against tos. Hey, they don’t supply written hh now and people still use huds. The only reason they caught that one guy is cause he was streaming on twitch and showed his hud. He would NEVER have been caught if he didn’t do that. Once again shows that sites are not capable of policing themselves