I don't think he has surpassed the level of genius of stephenmeares yet. His mind could see patterns that were too subtle for computer analysis or statistics to detect (a real claim he made).

Your rigged thread had lots of mature answers for your "question" but somehow you're still back trolling it up with paranoid conspiracies.

In fact, here is my first reply in that thread
Doesn't come across as confrontational iyam.

He and smears remind me of that tall guy in Startrek TNG.

Q.

tk1133 and smears are part of the rigtard continuum.

I guess he can reach Rigtard Nirvana when he gets banned.

What's with the we ****, like you're an insider on the regulation of poker or something.

Dont know what your talking about but the unregulated pre UIGEA days were great even an idiot fish like me could print money.

The rigtardometer seems to have gone off the scale in 2009. I swear we never got this many rigged posts in previous years... What's going on???

Juk

Can we hold you to this?

Juk

Loaded questions are generally not as effective as you may think when you type them, and in fact they show a lack of logical thinking.

Example

Have you stopped sleeping with your sister or not? Well, have you? That question deserves an answer.


No, it does not deserve an answer, it's a flawed question as it assumes something that is not fact. Rigtards tend to rely on tactics like this a lot and it is another reason why they are rarely taken seriously.

you said we should look for them
no, someone who keeps saying that dumb **** over and over but never provides evidence to back it up is useless.
If an obviously intellectually-challenged person (I know, you don't come across many folks dumber than you, but try to follow along...) kept telling you the only reason you did well at Madden 08 is because it was programmed to make you win, wouldn't you ask them why they thought such a preposterous thing?

And when they didn't give you a good reason, and instead continued to say that it's not your skill that brings you success, but an inside job to give you an unfair advantage is responsible, wouldn't that annoy you?

So, as a reasonable person would do in such a situation, I'm sure you'd ask this sub-human to provide some credible proof for their allegations. However, they respond with "prove it's NOT rigged for you." Would that be a satisfactory reply?

Finally, after this rigtard has displayed a severe lack of common sense while spouting silly fabrications and half-understood rumors, they continue to badger you and anyone else they can find to perpetuate this foolishness. Would you not find that incredibly aggravating?

It's unfortunate you don't have the same skills at seeing patterns as your hero, stephen meares, but that's basically exactly what you've been doing for months here.
What is there to prove wrong about this thread? I've said before that reading comprehension isn't something you should brag about. "Your proving my point." (sic)
what could that term even mean?

the reason this is ******ed is because even if I felt there was some nefarious plot behind e-harmony, I would just not use their services. that would be the end of it. perhaps in casual conversation I'd mention it when appropriate to my acquaintances, but I wouldn't make a crusade out of it.

but you, on the other hand, think online poker is rigged and for some reason you've appointed yourself the hero to bring the conspiracy to light. why? what is there for you to gain? do you think there will be a monetary reward? perhaps a parade or statue in your honor? a park or roadway named after you?

I saw you bragging about how apt this example you provided was. Unfortunately, it's fairly worthless, kind of like your existence.

Pretty sure he is just caught in a must have the last word battle with you at this point.

I know I would not want to set the betting line on that

personally, I suspect that he's a shill for the Brick & Mortar Casinos and doesn't want folks playing online. I base that on his numerous insinuations about impending regulation and his overall tone discouraging new players.

why doesnt everyone concede its rigged so the rigtards can gtfo?

Seriously, take a step back and take a deep breath. You just genuinely assumed that other guy was a shill. Who usually does that assumption?

He's just a routine below average guy who uses routine flawed methods of deduction ie: a rigtard, and a fairly mundane one at that.

Let it go already.

Markus was joking.

By the 100th post of that type it gets a bit hard to tell.

Seriously.

If only it were that easy. That would be like throwing gasoline on a bonfire.

This is so laughable because you are a well known shill for the Hard Rock in Florida. How many bbvs have you posted where your 10xbb preflop raise with aces was called by J8s and you won? Lots.

yeah, I have that problem a lot in general. kind of like in The Simpsons episode "Homerpalooza" ...

Disaffected youth #1: Here comes that cannonball guy. He's cool.
Disaffected youth #2: Are you being sarcastic, dude?
Disaffected youth #1: I don't even know anymore.
Ya know, I've tried that exact method before but got basically a gas on fire result.

tk is just another in a long line of attention-seeking trolls, kind of like that jerk steven meares on the Golden Tee forums. Just being contrary for the sake of creating a stir.

The biggest beat I've posted consistently regarding live poker is having to listen to the raspy mouth-breathing and grade-school level of reasoning/conversation of the drooling mongoloids with whom I share the table.

It's players like tk who hold up the already unbearable pace of live play by asking for the deck to be washed twice per dealer, keep changing seats because the guy who left it was lucky and think that because two other ******s won with a hand like 92 or 94 in the last hour or so that "Nines are hot today!"

i got a gold chain
im on cocaine
im like yo maan

I'm a shill for casino's? lol. First I was steven meeres, then I was some delusional rigtard, now I'm a shill for casino's? My unlce is in the United States House of Represenatives.

Stage #xxxxxxxxxx Tourney ID XXXXXXXXXX Holdem Single Tournament No Limit 100 - 2009-04-03 20:03:38 (ET)
Table: 28042138 (Real Money) Seat #8 is the dealer
Seat 3 - HIGH BLUFF M (3255 in chips)
Seat 6 - AJCOPP0730 (3980 in chips)
Seat 7 - DAVEBIGBALLS (495 in chips)
Seat 8 - DUGGAN5750 (3305 in chips)
Seat 9 - HERO (2465 in chips)
HERO - Posts small blind 50
HIGH BLUFF M - Posts big blind 100
*** POCKET CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO[5c 5d]
AJCOPP0730 - Folds
DAVEBIGBALLS - Folds
DUGGAN5750 - Calls 100
HERO - Calls 50
HIGH BLUFF M - Raises 300 to 400
DUGGAN5750 - Folds
HERO - Calls 300
*** FLOP *** [3h 10h 4c]
HERO - Checks
HIGH BLUFF M - Bets 300
HERO - Raises 700 to 700
HIGH BLUFF M - Calls 400
*** TURN *** [3h 10h 4c] [Jd]
HERO - All-In 1365
HIGH BLUFF M - Calls 1365
*** RIVER *** [3h 10h 4c Jd] [5h]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
HIGH BLUFF M - Shows [Qd Kh] (king high)
HERO - Shows [5c 5d] (Three of a kind, fives)
HERO Collects 5030 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total Pot(5030)
Board [3h 10h 4c Jd 5h]
Seat 3: HIGH BLUFF M (big blind) HI:lost with king high [Qd Kh - P:Kh,P:Qd,B:Jd,B:10h,B:5h]
Seat 6: AJCOPP0730 Folded on the POCKET CARDS
Seat 7: DAVEBIGBALLS Folded on the POCKET CARDS
Seat 8: DUGGAN5750 (dealer) Folded on the POCKET CARDS
Seat 9: HERO (small blind) won Total (5030) All-In HI5030) with Three of a kind, fives [5c 5d - B:5h,P:5d,P:5c,B:Jd,B:10h]

this is how bad i am at poker playing a 100 dollar sng

He's probably the guy who called Barney Frank "Barney ***".

I would like to hear from anyone who has played 500,000k on Bodog and Pokerstars who feels the rng is the same