Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Fulltilt froze my account with 47 grand in it Fulltilt froze my account with 47 grand in it

11-12-2007 , 05:00 PM
Quote:
An attorney would be useless here. Full Tilt is not located in the US.
This is sad but QFT.
11-12-2007 , 05:42 PM
Quote:
Quote:
An attorney would be useless here. Full Tilt is not located in the US.
This is sad but QFT.
wrong.
11-12-2007 , 06:03 PM
An attorney who practices in the US is useless. An attorney who practices in whatever jursidiction this falls under isn't useless.

She isn't gonna win shiat in court. I am sorry but if she is a proven botter on multiple accounts and 1 account magically isn't a bot she is still getting what she deserved. What is sad this actually helps Mr. Gatorade's creditability and I hate that bastard as much as the next 2+2er.
11-12-2007 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
What is sad this actually helps Mr. Gatorade's creditability and I hate that bastard as much as the next 2+2er.
Which part, his site never listed her as a bot, he's bot hunting and couldn't find her?
11-12-2007 , 08:14 PM
Why is discussion continuing on this? They are guilty. END OF STORY.
11-12-2007 , 08:17 PM
Quote:
Why is discussion continuing on this?
There are two discussions in here:

1) Is Sillysal guilty? (and if so, what of?)

2) Is FTP's process for handling this stuff any good?

Quote:
They are guilty
There appears to be a number of people here who are not convinced of that.
11-12-2007 , 09:19 PM
What happened to Haven posting his opinion based on the evidence FT sent him?
11-12-2007 , 09:47 PM
Quote:
What happened to Haven posting his opinion based on the evidence FT sent him?
Nothin, no post, no more comments from Mike Haven, actually SillySal said more, she made a statement she would not be posting anymore.
11-12-2007 , 10:58 PM
I gotta get more popcorn and sodas.
11-13-2007 , 06:59 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
An attorney would be useless here. Full Tilt is not located in the US.
This is sad but QFT.
wrong.
How am I wrong?

Of the countless disputes between players and online poker sites, how many have ever resulted in attorneys recovering the seized money? The answer to that would be ZERO.

I don't know what jurisdiction Full Tilt exists in, but my guess is that it would be extremely difficult -- if not impossible -- to successfully take them to court and win a judgment against them.

Remember, they are in control of all the evidence. Even if Sillysal successfully gets them dragged into some foreign courtroom, they just need to pull out some convincing, official-looking evidence of botting and she's done for. Most poker sites exist in very online gambling friendly environments. The hurdles one would have to jump in order to get a successful civil judgment against Full Tilt would be insurmountable -- especially when you're just a single individual accused of a form of cheating.
11-13-2007 , 07:14 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
An attorney would be useless here. Full Tilt is not located in the US.
This is sad but QFT.
wrong.
How am I wrong?

Of the countless disputes between players and online poker sites, how many have ever resulted in attorneys recovering the seized money? The answer to that would be ZERO.

I don't know what jurisdiction Full Tilt exists in, but my guess is that it would be extremely difficult -- if not impossible -- to successfully take them to court and win a judgment against them.

Remember, they are in control of all the evidence. Even if Sillysal successfully gets them dragged into some foreign courtroom, they just need to pull out some convincing, official-looking evidence of botting and she's done for. Most poker sites exist in very online gambling friendly environments. The hurdles one would have to jump in order to get a successful civil judgment against Full Tilt would be insurmountable -- especially when you're just a single individual accused of a form of cheating.
They are not fully in control of the evidence ... evidence is one thing proof is another. But the casinos have everything in control - their license agreement, that you signed, and which is such that every player breaks it . Many casinos in fact state in their license agreement that they can close your account even without a reason.

On the other hand, it could have some effect, as if you sue the casino and win this can really damage the casino business (which they won't risk for some 47k) ...
11-13-2007 , 08:57 PM
Quote:
sillysal, ooohhh sillysal. We need an update plaese. Where are you?

I don't like the way sillysal is not keeping us informed every hour. Jeez even FTP say they only take 24 hours.

sillysal's customer service is dreadful
Is she holding any of your money?
11-13-2007 , 09:05 PM
Quote:
Quote:

Fraudsters in every other part of our western communities are told what they are accused of when they have large chunks of money frozen. I don't think people who are accused of defrauding poker sites are any worse than other accused fraudsters in the world.
Yes, but due to the fact that online poker is based on a trust relationship, (they trust that you dont cheat, you trust that they won't steal your money), I think its hardto compare it to "western communities".

In western communities, when you are accused of a crime, they have you locked up and you have nowhere to run, and they know where you are and who you are allowed to talk to at all times.
I guess you've never heard about bail. I can't tell whether you're trolling or you really are as stupid as you appear to be.
11-13-2007 , 09:09 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
An attorney would be useless here. Full Tilt is not located in the US.
This is sad but QFT.
wrong.
How am I wrong?

Of the countless disputes between players and online poker sites, how many have ever resulted in attorneys recovering the seized money? The answer to that would be ZERO.

I don't know what jurisdiction Full Tilt exists in, but my guess is that it would be extremely difficult -- if not impossible -- to successfully take them to court and win a judgment against them.

Remember, they are in control of all the evidence. Even if Sillysal successfully gets them dragged into some foreign courtroom, they just need to pull out some convincing, official-looking evidence of botting and she's done for. Most poker sites exist in very online gambling friendly environments. The hurdles one would have to jump in order to get a successful civil judgment against Full Tilt would be insurmountable -- especially when you're just a single individual accused of a form of cheating.
The simple answer is to sue in an american jurisdiction in which poker is legal. Full Tilt defends, or gets defaulted. If they get defaulted (a choice they may make) you seize assets they have in America. They have assets in America, certainly 47 K.

The real problem here is the probable guilt of the accused. If someone demonstrates to me that different humans could have those pretty much identical across the board stats, I am open to being convinced. Its not like we are just talking about VPIP and preflop raise %s.

I don't think its proof positive, but I'd bet that those type of identical stats are going to show that identical hands were played identically, both pre and post flop.
11-13-2007 , 11:56 PM
Quote:
Time for me to chime in a bit on this one. I think I may be able to clear some things up.

First off, I know who sillysal is. She's approximately 40 years old, white, and lives in the greater Los Angeles area (I think Toluca Lake). I have never seen her at Commerce or any of the other area poker rooms. She seems to play exclusively heads-up Limit Hold 'Em, and has done so for several years. She represented "Team Poker Room" at the WSOP by winning a seat on pokerroom.com in 2006. You can see a picture of her by going to the following URL:

http://www.pokerroom.com/newsroom/ph...es/photos.html

Click on WSOP 2006 Part I, and then go to pictures 51-53. I think there are a few others in there of her, as well.

She played on Pokerroom as "Jonesen" and "pokergirl z". She may have had a few other names, but those are the two I remember. There were no suspicions of her being a bot at the time.

However, one interesting (and perhaps suspicious) coincidence is that redgar3 was also a player on Pokerroom. redgar3 was the same person as BeatMe1 on Full Tilt (this has been verified). The similarities don't end there. When BeatMe1 got shut down for botting, the owner of that account showed up on 2+2 and claimed to be a woman named "Lisa". That makes two female heads up specialists, both of whom played at Pokerroom, both of whom got shut down on Full Tilt for allegedly using bots.

I have been around the Limit Hold 'Em high limit scene for over 5 years now. There are very few female heads-up specialists. I'm not saying that there aren't any, because that would be inaccurate. However, they are few and far between. Yet both of these suspected botters are female and originated from Pokerroom. In addition, neither has ever been seen playing Limit Hold 'Em in live card rooms.

Now, it might seem from the above that I am leaning towards the belief that sillysal was guilty of botting. However, while I am still undecided on the issue, I must also point out the following in her favor:

1) I have played with her before on several sites, as have a number of my friends. All of us have observed her to be an emotional player who is tilt-prone. That is not consistent with the play of a bot.

2) While her play on Full Tilt was better (and less tilty) than her play on Pokerroom and elsewhere, we observed a similar style of play in all cases. This would speak against a switch to botting at some point, as her style would noticeably change.

3) She would almost always chat if you attempted to talk to her. Again, this speaks against a bot, unless she happened to be at the keyboard every time it played.


Now, I suppose it's very possible she was using some sort of helper software -- or what I like to call a semi-bot. That is, she may have had a tool telling her what to do, but leaving the ultimate decisions and control up to her. I find it unlikely that she had a fully automated bot running the show, though I suppose anything is possible. It is also quite possible that she was not using ANY helper software, and that Full Tilt is completely full of crap.

One other factor that could possibly point to sillysal's usage of a bot/semi-bot involves her playstyle itself. I noticed that her biggest leak was her inability to make laydowns. For example, it was just about impossible to bet her off ace high or any low pair, no matter how terrible the board was for such a hand. It was also rather difficult to bet her off king high. This did make her frustrating to play against to some degree, as it was quite difficult to bluff her, and you would essentially have to check/call or check/fold when failing to make a pair. However, it would allow you to get good value out of your mediocre hands. This is a characteristic I have observed in bot opponents (such as the Poki Poker software) I have played against. They tend to stubbornly refuse to fold when most humans would.

sillysal would also tend to quit if running bad. This is good practice if you're human (i.e. avoiding tilt), but pointless if you're a bot. This is yet another reason why I believe that -- at the very least -- a human was at the physical controls the entire time.

My conclusions:

1) Sillysal is a real female who has been playing heads-up Limit Hold 'Em online for at least a few years.

2) I find it unlikely that a bot was playing on the pokergirl z account unattended.

3) I find it possible, but not conclusive or even likely, that BeatMe1 and Sillysal/pokergirl are associated. However, I don't believe them to be the same person. If they are indeed associated in some way, the chance of Sillysal's guilt is extremely high.

4) From what I know of Sillysal, she is not highly technically competent and is unlikely to be datamining. I do not believe her and Tetrahedron to be the same person. Furthermore, if she did use bots/semi-bots, I do not believe she has the ability to program them herself.

5) The fact that someone from the Los Angeles area has never (to my knowledge) been seen at the live Commerce games makes the likelihood of botting higher. In addition, she will not play any other game than heads up -- a form of poker proven to be favored by bots. However, I know several longtime online pros from L.A. and Vegas who have also never played live.

6) There are two possibilities on how Full Tilt judged her to be guilty. The first involves taking user complaints about her and compiling circumstantial evidence against her that would appear to incriminate her, but in reality produces highly erroneous false positives. The second involves using means that would potentially be considered privacy violations, but can give a much more accurate picture as to what was really going on. For example, Full Tilt's software could monitor other processes running or take occasional screen shots. Either of these could provide the smoking-gun proof of botting, but they would be hesitant to cite such specific evidence, as a separate scandal involving privacy violation would arise. In either case, it is to Full Tilt's advantage to simply shut down the account and refuse to release details. This, unfortunately, gives us little insight as to how guilty Sillysal and other alleged bots actually were. Barring further information, we will never know the truth.

Bottom line: I am leaning toward her innocence, but I still believe it could go either way on this one.

Dandruff

You have pegged me almost perfectly (40?? Really??)

I do and have left games to avoid tilting. It's kind of what I'm known for. I am very emotional and swear a lot.

I avoid players who I believe are better than me, or close to my skill as there is no EV in it. That's why I avoid you.

I'm very chatty as most anyone who's talked or met me can attest.

I clearly have played other games as I won a seat to the WSOP 2005, from Intercasino playing a NL sit and go, as was the case when I won the seat to the WSOP 2006 from Pokerroom. I have also played NL short handed tourneys and live NL tournaments at the Bicycle club.

I was a fixture for many years at the Bike casino. I used to bank Pai Gow games there. Johnny Chan knows who I am as we've played Pai gow against each other many times. I have also played both Pai Gow and poker at Commerce, Hustler, and Hawaiian Gardens.

I have avoided brick and mortar casinos since I was followed home and attacked and robbed in my garage.

I am not beatme1.


I have been an online player for 5 years. I did not just "show-up" at Pokerroom.

I have not used a bot of any kind ... EVER.

I have never used any illegal software.... EVER. I do not use pokertracker.

I am still in contact with FTP and am trying to resolve this and prove my innocence.

I give FTP authorization to show any report they have that shows I've used any illegal software.

You won't see it cuz they don't have it.
11-14-2007 , 12:04 AM
Quote:

You have pegged me almost perfectly (40?? Really??)

I do and have left games to avoid tilting. It's kind of what I'm known for. I am very emotional and swear a lot.

I avoid players who I believe are better than me, or close to my skill as there is no EV in it. That's why I avoid you.

I'm very chatty as most anyone who's talked or met me can attest.

I clearly have played other games as I won a seat to the WSOP 2005, from Intercasino playing a NL sit and go, as was the case when I won the seat to the WSOP 2006 from Pokerroom. I have also played NL short handed tourneys and live NL tournaments at the Bicycle club.

I was a fixture for many years at the Bike casino. I used to bank Pai Gow games there. Johnny Chan knows who I am as we've played Pai gow against each other many times. I have also played both Pai Gow and poker at Commerce, Hustler, and Hawaiian Gardens.

I have avoided brick and mortar casinos since I was followed home and attacked and robbed in my garage.

I am not beatme1.


I have been an online player for 5 years. I did not just "show-up" at Pokerroom.

I have not used a bot of any kind ... EVER.

I have never used any illegal software.... EVER. I do not use pokertracker.

I am still in contact with FTP and am trying to resolve this and prove my innocence.

I give FTP authorization to show any report they have that shows I've used any illegal software.

You won't see it cuz they don't have it.

Wow thanks for getting back Sal. Apart from the stats we saw, have FTP shown you any other proof you are guilty or do you just have to accept their decision?

I still get the feeling FTP have made another mistake.
11-14-2007 , 01:11 AM
Quote:
I still get the feeling FTP have made another mistake.
11-14-2007 , 01:48 AM
damn shes hot!!!
11-14-2007 , 01:49 AM
No way she's 40 imo.
11-14-2007 , 01:56 AM
Quote:
No way she's 40 imo.
over/under at 38?
11-14-2007 , 02:58 AM
that's a good line...
11-14-2007 , 03:46 AM
If Fulltilt is wrong it is going to be quite a dilemma for them!
11-14-2007 , 04:40 AM
So sillysal has decided to honour us all by posting under that name again. Whilst she is not obligated to post here the fact that someone thought she was 40 she felt was too much to stay silent on.

The fact she has been a regular player for years and knows Johnny Chan is proof of nothing. She has given us no additional information but states that FTP can post any reports (knowing full well FTP are not going to post it here).

FTP will I think correct errors (e.g. after sillysal accused them of delays they countered by saying replies had always been sent within 24 hours) but they are not going to disclose their bot catching techniques.

All we now know that we didn’t previously is that she is not 40 – she didn’t say whether she was older or younger but let’s give her the benefit of the doubt on that one at least. It would be interesting to know:

• What other information has FTP communicated to sillysal?
• What other information has been communicated to Mike Haven?
• Mike Haven posted on 5th Nov saying a spreadsheet cell need to be clarified. Has it?
• Why has Mike Haven not even updated us? Is FTP or sillysal objecting?
• Why is FTP so silent? I accept they can’t supply details but good PR should at least say they remain in contact directly with sillysal (even she admits this).

My apologies to Mike Haven – he didn’t ask to be drawn into this fiasco but now he has I think a little communication would not go amiss. There is no obligation on sillysal to keep us informed and I would have preferred her staying silent if her only concern was to insist on her innocence (of not being 40). Thanks for the latest update after all this time.

Unless anybody has anything of substance to add to this thread it may as well die.
11-14-2007 , 05:07 AM
Quote:
So sillysal has decided to honour us all by posting under that name again.
This detracts from the rest of your post.

Mods are able to perform very simple IP checks to weed people posting under multiple accounts out.

Quote:
Whilst she is not obligated to post here the fact that someone thought she was 40 she felt was too much to stay silent on.
Dan's post covered a number of issues.

Quote:
The fact she has been a regular player for years and knows Johnny Chan is proof of nothing. She has given us no additional information but states that FTP can post any reports (knowing full well FTP are not going to post it here).
WTF sort of information or proof do you want from her?

What hurdle are you setting for her?
11-14-2007 , 05:19 AM
Josem isnt it pretty obvious what happened here?

This beatme character obviously had sillysal play one of his accounts. Most likely paid her well for this. He knew eventually there was a good chance the account would get flagged and when it did the plan churns into action.

Poor ole sillysal, pro poker player, and women comes in saying how she was robbed. Afterall how many women players do you know that play the types of limits sillysal did?

I know I might be acting sexist with all of this, but the idea of some 40 year old women sitting in front of the computer 12 hours a day playing high limit heads up holdem online seems rather out of the ordinary.

      
m