Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybruin
Waiting forever at fast poker? Any change could cause other problems. It would be brutal from a rake perspective to be constantly playing 3 or 4 handed even with a pool of 10 for example. I would rather play 6 handed with a pool of 6 or more. Don't get us rake crushed. Any method of play with a pool of less than 6 is ok with me.
Change could cause problems true, but waiting for 6 people in a small pool I still feel is a bit much. Also, rake is adjusted when it is 3 handed or lower. I do understand your view of rake effecting it, but even if it hit 5 handed, that is a huge difference in wait time. The purpose of blitz is to be fast. 4 handed with a small pool of 10 honestly is fine in my opinion.
I guess it will be different when the site does have the normal traffic, so we will see how it is then, but just a thought.