From my own firsthand experience his interpretation of the data is pretty spot on. I have not found very many, possibly any, accounts in the micros that had similar statistics and were able to maintain a positive bb/100 that were not bots.
I'm not really sure what you mean by "the latter part of your post above even supports that." as I don't believe it does. I think you may just be misunderstanding what I said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by moss84
um...these are calling station stats. A little more aggressive than your typical micro calling station but one nonetheless. I don't think most of the successful bots call down to what you are stating on the flop and turn and they get to showdown much less than 30%.
These are just incorrect assumptions about how a successful micro-stakes bot actually plays. My own definition of a calling station would not fit the statistics he provided since I don't think of calling stations as being aggressive(raising) or being able to maintain a winning bb/100. I guess you use a different definition that relies solely on a player not folding to cbets and going to showdown more often than the average player in your games.
Last edited by MCAChiTown; 02-23-2019 at 07:27 PM.