Quote:
Originally Posted by kahntrutahn
One can only assume then that your definition of an "illegal gambling site" and Skrills definition of an "illegal gambling site" differ.
What is Skrill's definition of an illegal gambling operation? I am not aware about their definition, as they never gave a statement.
Despite of this, what is an illegal operation and not is defined by the criminal laws and not by me or Skrill. And you can be rest assured that misappropriation of player funds and or fraud thru misleading information and or bankruptcy fraud is a criminal offense in most countries in this world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kahntrutahn
And since Skrill controls the money and you post on an Internet forum, I think it is safe to assume that Skrill wins this argument.
I have never heard an argument from them, please quote?
They control indeed the electronic money, but there is something higher that controls them. E.g. the Financial Conduct Authority under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 and the criminal and civil laws, police and court in England.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kahntrutahn
As such, why do you continue to post this "advice" with such authority and gusto under the user name "Player Protection?" The "advice" you offer gives people false hope and makes them think you know a solution to their issues, when in fact, you have none. Please explain.
I doubt very much that you are able to assess whether my advice is a solution or not. Despite of this, I inform victims about their rights and have never stated that this will lead to success.
1) If Skrill habitually and grave do not fulfill the ToS, the first step is to send a registered letter to their legal department and ask to reverse the transactions or ask for indemnification.
-> I can not assess the outcome of this, as this solely depend on the willingness of Skrill. I would say, the more people write, the higher is the chance they get aware of this.
2) The next step would be to sue them in London, preferably a class action.
My
personal assessment is as follows:
1) I can exclude that the court will come to the conclusion that the ToS are not valid, as this would mean that no one in England has to fulfill contracts he has signed, which would lead to chaos.
2) Do we have enough proof that Skrill habitually and grave do not fulfill the legally binding agreement? In my opinion yes:
a) I and I am sure many of you know that they habitually process transactions to and from gambling sites, even though this is not allowed due to local legislation and even though this is a breach of Skrill's own ToS.
b) Misappropriation of player funds, fraud thru misleading statements and bankruptcy fraud is usually a criminal offense = illegal operation and If you read in the withdrawal threads here, you can see that Skrill habitually process deposits to such companies = breach of Skrill's own ToS.
c) I have never heard that they reported a criminal company to the relevant authorities, even then not when they stopped deposits to merchant accounts(e.g. Lock Poker) = breach of Skrill's own ToS.