Quote:
Originally Posted by justAnobody
You work for this company, if not you are deeply affiliated with them and you're constant shilling is unbearable.
It's unfortunate that posters have become so cynical that they lob out shill (one of the most misused words on this forum) accusations at the drop of a hat now, and no one can be bothered to even check the most basic facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronmon
Seriously, the guy's been here 4 months and has 996 posts. Most if not all of them in this thread making wild and unverifiable claims in support of CoinPoker.
There is 0% chance he is not affiliated with the site in some way or another.
Here's a really good example. I mean, it took me about 5 seconds to check how many posts he has in this thread. Pretty sure 92/996 posts isn't remotely close to "most if not all of them". And really, I didn't even have to check anything beyond the number of posts in this thread - 685. How this accusation could've made sense to you - well, it couldn't, had you thought about it. And all that aside, you should go back and read the first few pages of the thread and check out noose's posts there. Worst shill ever.
Occam's Razor, anyone? Yes, this is our good old Nash guy - I've been pretty sure of that since the first few weeks he started posting, and certain of it not long after, as I usually am with most of his accounts. He has a very unique posting style. But he also brings some value when he's posting reasonably - many of his posts in the NVG decentralized poker thread (the one where he actually posts most often) have been decent, or at the very least have led to some interesting discussion. This is usually how it is with him - he sticks around for some good conversation, and then usually gets out of line at some point and loses another account. So back to Occam's Razor - he's nothing more than an over-exuberant alt-coin/decentralized poker guy. Could he be either a former CP skeptic/critic turned paid employee, or a really clever shill who started off pretending to be against the site to set up his shill game for later? Sure. Do I find it likely? No, not very. 0% chance he's not affiliated with the site? LOL.
Quote:
Originally Posted by justAnobody
Actually it's you that doesn't belong in this thread....
...You're telling posters you have greater knowledge than them, telling them they don't belong...lol get a grip guy
But...this part of your post has some merit. The arrogance is misplaced, unneeded, and Noose is becoming a distraction. Enough, Noose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monteroy
If you experienced the history of the Nash guy you would actually understand that genuinely being affiliated with a specific company that falls within whatever his latest obsession is is not actually important to him. Don't try to apply normal behavior rules and expectations.
Very well said.