Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
In the case of p2p transfers, they absolutely can and many sites would do the same. If they never did this, it would be a way for people to get out of bonus conditions, playthrough requirements, etc.
I think there might be some confusion here.
a) It is fair for poker sites to ask customers to use their facilities for the (primary) purpose of playing online poker. It's broadly reasonable for sites to demand that users use their peer-to-peer transfer facility for the purpose of playing poker.
b) However, it is not acceptable for online poker sites to
confiscate money from customers because players have not played enough online poker on their sites. At the end of the day, it is player money - it is money that belongs to players, not to 888 (or any other online poker site).
It is possible to have rules and policies that are consistent with both (a) and (b) - this could be achieved by a variety of different mechanisms.
It
seems (but it isn't clear! post the bloody emails to/from the site!) that 888 is enforcing (a) but threatening to confiscate the customer's money if they don't play quickly enough. To me, that's pretty unconscionable - confiscation is a punishment for deliberate evil fraudsters, it's obviously illegal for a private business to punish honest customers as apparently described above.
Also, just to re-iterate, it's not very clear what is actually happening here, and OP should post
all the communication to/from the site.