I'd like to propose an addition to the rules outlined above. HUDs/Software/etc which contain assumptions/colour coding/feedback/derived information based on population tendencies should not be allowed. Software like this is currently being sold openly. These population tendencies must necessarily be compiled from data mined sources, shared databases, or at least a single database (which is essentially having a derivative of its data shared).
Two prime offenders are the CoffeeHUD and the Spin & Go HUD:
Part of the CoffeeHUD description:
Quote:
Lastly, the HUD is made to be both as aesthetically pleasing and as accessible as possible. Statistics are put in small groups that can be moved according to your preferences. It features an advanced color coding system: each statistic is coded individually. It functions as a leakbuster inside the HUD--it highlights extremes in your opponents’ games. This color coding system also provides advanced theoretical information: pure fold equity to bluff certain sizings, variation from population tendency, and distance from Nash equilibrium ranges at short stacks. You can even use this feature away from the tables to find places where your strategy is exploitable.
Ryan, of HUSNG.com, on the Spin & Go HUD:
I understand that Pokerstars feels that shared data is an unfair advantage, and I agree. I think in this case, these products containing derivatives of shared data are giving the ones using it an unfair advantage over those not using it. It's even possible that someone using the coffeehud is playing someone who had 'contributed' to this derived data. Everyone should be on the same page regarding historical data, and having to pay money, or even if it was free, to have knowledge of its availability, to get access to the same historical data is not sufficient. Players should only have information of or based on past hands which has been accumulated through their own play, and their own play only.