Quote:
Originally Posted by New PokerStars Rule Proposal
Q. In general, what kind of tools and services are acceptable?
A. The following types of tools and services are generally acceptable:
1. Tools and services that simply report basic game state information, such as pot odds or absolute hand strength.
2. Tools and services that are static reference material and basic in nature, such as a single table-based starting hand chart.
3. Tools and services that profile your opponents, but make use of only information which you have accumulated through your own play.
4. Macros and Hotkey programs that don’t have any bearing on gameplay logic. For example, you can use AutoHotKey, MacroExpress or AutoIt3 to make it such that you ‘bet the pot’ when you press the 'P' key, but you cannot use these or other utilities to create an autofolder that folds poor starting hands, or that automates advice or actions from any other tool or service.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Steve
If you wish to impact the decision, I encourage you to share not only your preferred outcome but also your reasoning.
Item 1
Disagree. The PS client should incorporate (or offer the option of) any game based data that is allowed so that all players should have equal access.
Item 2
Agreed to the extent this simply replicates looking at a book/printed chart (as long as there is nothing which facilitates lookup based on particular parameters).
Item 3
Strongly disagree. Such tools, notably HUDs, are different in nature to the others listed in that they provide:
(a) a major advantage to the player (anyone who disagrees doesn't understand poker)
(b) an advantage which can't be replicated by limited effort
(c) opponent-specific data
(d) large amounts of data (encapsulated)
(e) data which goes well beyond the memory capacity and data-collation skills of humans
Each of these are undesirable aspects imo. In addition, HUDs:
- act as a platform for even greater advantages to those willing and able to tailor them or use add-ons
- facilitate cheating, notably through use of hand histories acquired through sharing/trading and through cheating add-ons
- provide potential assistance/inputs to bots
- are seen as unfair by casual players
- are in fact unfair
- could generate very bad publicity for the game
- help kill the fish too quickly for a healthy eco-system
- generate a software war rather than skill battle
- fundamentally change the nature of the game (I prefer playing something approximating the game called poker rather than the game of gathering and interpreting large volumes of stats and chasing round for the latest add-ons etc)
Allowing this category also makes it impractical to draw a clear line on what exactly is allowed.
Item 4
Agreed to the extent those act solely as convenience devices. Would prefer they were offered as options on the client but meh.
My preference
Add all allowed features into the client and ban all external in-game software. Kill the problem at its root (through eg sn changes, anonymous tables, limiting provision of hh) as enforcement otherwise too problematic. Also ban anything which gives the player seating advantages over others. Announce the decisions now and implement from 1 Jan 2016.