Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Matthew
..., but overall we believe these changes will have a positive impact on the long-term viability of the poker ecosystem. Approximately two percent of players are significantly impacted by these changes.
Absolute silly this statement. This 2 (!) percent are sure a ly!!! I will say why. Much people, as I too, had and have the hope to learn poker to earn money. But now you cap the large winnings and so the hope for larger winnings.
I learned four years ago poker and tried much poker-rooms. Your WAS the finest, because here played in my limits more than 1000 players in ZOOM (NL 0.05 and 0.10) and all other rooms I leaved because there are only 100 players max at top times. Since two years I played only at your room, but I think your decisions make your room dead, too, because as others said, your are starting 2016 no time more beeing special.
It was and it is a hope for that I come in the sne zone. Now you kill my hope and so I will sure finish playing poker.
I think that what you plan is my end of a never beginning poker career. All what I read is that the lucky games (as spins and Co) are your main idea. But if I want lucky games I play Lotto.
I loved the stellar bonus. It was low (i was forever silver-star and got 3 or 4 times the 50$ over the year), but I got something. I think if you write that nothing change for the low-star-player, you ly again: This stellar-prices will GONE!
By the way, I'm only a break even player (but only because I got the stellar bonus) and I think I'm not good enough to reach more. But as you now cap the hope, I will sure finish playing poker.
And you believe that I'm go lonely with my opinion? It's ok for me.
RIP