Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed?

12-30-2010 , 07:31 PM
really seems like 2p2 trying to help sweep it under the rug

*

Edit/MH: Link to thread; closed as all worthwhile debate had finished: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...le-sng-926558/

Last edited by Mike Haven; 12-31-2010 at 09:43 AM.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 07:32 PM
It's closed?
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 07:37 PM
it is in the zoo
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 07:37 PM
It seems the thread was closed due to all of the derailment going on in that thread. It's also very unlikely that FTP will be addressing any of the concerns raised in that thread...
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 07:50 PM
they will definately not if this is just allowed to fade away. also isnt it in the mods duty to deal with the derailment not just close a thread with over 40000 views and 450 posts. seems like a lot of vested interest in keeping lid on this. Noahsd only real heavy chiming in. kinda disappointed 2pt imo forcing accountability from sites is your greatest value.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottlenose
really seems like 2p2 trying to help sweep it under the rug
Um, what?

The thread has been open for over a month and 2+2 is sweeping it under the rug??

If you have something new to add to the topic, perhaps you should PM a mod of the forum (not me - an active Zoo mod like Mike, Mark, or RW) and see if they would be willing to reopen or have a suggestion of somewhere else you should post it.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 08:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Um, what?

The thread has been open for over a month and 2+2 is sweeping it under the rug??

If you have something new to add to the topic, perhaps you should PM a mod of the forum (not me - an active Zoo mod like Mike, Mark, or RW) and see if they would be willing to reopen or have a suggestion of somewhere else you should post it.
1st 2p2 reply 2+2 ad man
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 08:02 PM
Thread got into this derail with one guy posting like a billion posts in a row, each with each sentence starting its own paragraph. Probably better to just warn the guy then lock the thread (espec since the original thing he was talkign about was kinda interesting), but it doesn't matter much since there's another thread in NVG about it and since there's probably never gonna be anything else to say about the situation anyway.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottlenose
1st 2p2 reply 2+2 ad man
Not sure what this is supposed to mean.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 08:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Not sure what this is supposed to mean.
0rly?
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 08:32 PM
Me neither...
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 08:49 PM
Must be code for something.....
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 09:33 PM
He is under the impression that since your undertitle is 2+2 ad man, that you closed it on behalf of Full Tilt and the possibility of losing their business.

Truth is, I reported the thread since it was turning into a pissing match.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 09:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyPox
Truth is, I reported the thread since it was turning into a pissing match.
how do ya' like them apples?
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 10:18 PM
gg kendog, ftp. peace
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottlenose
really seems like 2p2 trying to help sweep it under the rug
Yeah. They better hurry b4 someone sees it

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
The thread has been open for over a month and 2+2 is sweeping it under the rug??
Damn procrastinators.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 10:25 PM
I really want to derail this thread (not that it needs much help) so that when 2+2 justifiably closes it OP can say "See 2+2 sweeps all of these issues under the rug"
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottlenose
gg kendog, ftp. peace
epic comeback
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 10:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottlenose
0rly?
Um, yeah. Really.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyPox
He is under the impression that since your undertitle is 2+2 ad man, that you closed it on behalf of Full Tilt and the possibility of losing their business.
LOL. If so, wow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyPox
Truth is, I reported the thread since it was turning into a pissing match.
Yeah, and I don't think you were the only one. I imagine Mike or Mark closed it.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 11:10 PM
ok. this will very likely be my last post in this thread and i will try to be clear seeing as i dont always express myself very well in writing. i was not trying to say that i thought bobo had closed the other thread only that as ad man he was the most likely to have a perceived(real or not) conflict of interest in addressing why previous thread was closed. i also have found it strange that very few 2+2 higher ups have weighed in in either thread. sorry for any disrespect i will now go back to lurking and taking all my action to stars. flame away
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottlenose
ok. this will very likely be my last post in this thread and i will try to be clear seeing as i dont always express myself very well in writing. i was not trying to say that i thought bobo had closed the other thread only that as ad man he was the most likely to have a perceived(real or not) conflict of interest in addressing why previous thread was closed. i also have found it strange that very few 2+2 higher ups have weighed in in either thread. sorry for any disrespect i will now go back to lurking and taking all my action to stars. flame away
They haven't weighed in because they almost never weigh in on anything, they have no responsibility to do so, and this is a relatively small deal.


WTF are you talking about?
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-30-2010 , 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottlenose
ok. this will very likely be my last post in this thread and i will try to be clear seeing as i dont always express myself very well in writing. i was not trying to say that i thought bobo had closed the other thread only that as ad man he was the most likely to have a perceived(real or not) conflict of interest in addressing why previous thread was closed. i also have found it strange that very few 2+2 higher ups have weighed in in either thread. sorry for any disrespect i will now go back to lurking and taking all my action to stars. flame away
Ah, fair enough then. You'll see the reds post in these kind of threads VERY rarely. I'm the "highest up" you're likely to see post ITT.

I checked the thread, and it was [Edit/MH: Deleted my name so that I don't get drawn into this] that closed it.

Now, you are absolutely correct in that I could be seen as having a conflict of interest here, but I'll give you some straight answers anyway, and you (and others) can decide if you want to believe me or not. Please don't take my direct answers to mean I'm offended by you asking, because I'm not.

First of all, from my own personal perspective, whether FT continues to advertise or not has zero impact on my personal bottom line at this time. Of course it's in my best interest that 2+2 succeeds, so I suppose it's better for me that they stay.

I have modded here for almost 3 years. I've also been working in sales here for about 9 months. In that time, I've never been asked to, or asked anyone else to, close or delete any thread about a poker site, advertiser or not. Nor have I heard of a site asking 2+2 to do so, although it's possible that's happened, but most sites know better. I think there have been a few threads deleted where someone is obviously outright slandering a site by making unfounded allegations; we're very reluctant to do this, so it's a pretty rare occurrence.

As for this particular thread, I haven't asked Mike Haven, but I have little doubt that it was closed because of the mess it had become. Notice the thread wasn't deleted, and no one (that I'm aware of) has been asked to stop posting about the incident. That would be a pretty poor cover-up IMO. There are countless threads in these forums complaining about different issues at Stars, FT, and plenty of other sites that advertise here. There are also numerous threads praising sites that don't advertise here.

I think most poker sites realize that they're better off not trying to interfere in threads here. I believe 2+2 is well-known for its integrity when it comes to threads like these, and that's one of the things that makes it a great site. If a site like FT were to try to undermine what we do here, that would only hurt them in the long term as they have a pretty good presence on this site. I'm sure they wouldn't be upset if the occasional thread were to quietly go away, but this site is big enough now that doing such a thing is near impossible even if we wanted to. Sites like Stars and FT know they have to take the bad with the good.

Last edited by Mike Haven; 12-31-2010 at 09:36 AM.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-31-2010 , 12:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Ah, fair enough then. You'll see the reds post in these kind of threads VERY rarely. I'm the "highest up" you're likely to see post ITT.

I checked the thread, and it was [Edit/MH: Continuing cover-up] that closed it.

Now, you are absolutely correct in that I could be seen as having a conflict of interest here, but I'll give you some straight answers anyway, and you (and others) can decide if you want to believe me or not. Please don't take my direct answers to mean I'm offended by you asking, because I'm not.

First of all, from my own personal perspective, whether FT continues to advertise or not has zero impact on my personal bottom line at this time. Of course it's in my best interest that 2+2 succeeds, so I suppose it's better for me that they stay.

I have modded here for almost 3 years. I've also been working in sales here for about 9 months. In that time, I've never been asked to, or asked anyone else to, close or delete any thread about a poker site, advertiser or not. Nor have I heard of a site asking 2+2 to do so, although it's possible that's happened, but most sites know better. I think there have been a few threads deleted where someone is obviously outright slandering a site by making unfounded allegations; we're very reluctant to do this, so it's a pretty rare occurrence.

As for this particular thread, I haven't asked Mike Haven, but I have little doubt that it was closed because of the mess it had become. Notice the thread wasn't deleted, and no one (that I'm aware of) has been asked to stop posting about the incident. That would be a pretty poor cover-up IMO. There are countless threads in these forums complaining about different issues at Stars, FT, and plenty of other sites that advertise here. There are also numerous threads praising sites that don't advertise here.

I think most poker sites realize that they're better off not trying to interfere in threads here. I believe 2+2 is well-known for its integrity when it comes to threads like these, and that's one of the things that makes it a great site. If a site like FT were to try to undermine what we do here, that would only hurt them in the long term as they have a pretty good presence on this site. I'm sure they wouldn't be upset if the occasional thread were to quietly go away, but this site is big enough now that doing such a thing is near impossible even if we wanted to. Sites like Stars and FT know they have to take the bad with the good.
I can't believe you gave that inaneness such a thoughtful reply, good man.

Last edited by Mike Haven; 12-31-2010 at 09:38 AM.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-31-2010 , 01:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beatingyou
I can't believe you gave that inaneness such a thoughtful reply, good man.
Why. Its what makes bobo, bobo. Ive seen him maintan his class in much worse.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote
12-31-2010 , 01:42 AM
I've seen bobo kick kittens for looking at him the wrong way. The program appears to be working for him lately though.
Why was the shady full tilt screen name change closed? Quote

      
m