MicroDonky1, .01/.02-.02/.05 aren't Beast/BBJ tables so rake is probably comparable to most sites at those limits.
.05/.10 non Beast/BBJ tables run also so same thing but you can play Beast/BBJ tables at that stake where the rake is terribad.
I think it's pretty bad though. I have played on other sites and it doesn't seem like it was as bad, but that's why I was trying to get a number to compare. Maybe there's a thread somewhere containing a good comparison for different stakes I just haven't found it thus far.
But I have sat at the BBJ tables thinking I am due lol, and I agree the rake was tremendously high and something should be done so....
I hope everyone who signed this is not playing those tables. That is the only truly effective protest.
for their own benefit as well...i feel like an idiot after trying to make a run at the beast. read through this thread and stay away!
didn't make even half of what i normally have through that many hands on other sites, and that's after beast payout (1k) and rakeback....plus i was running hot, like super hot for the first 60k hands.
Is micro cash even profitable on bbj tables talking 10nl and under?
The short answer is, it's possible to be profitable, but not enough to be worth bothering. I had a ~7BB/100 win rate at the 10NL tables that aren't BBJ, and ~2 at the BBJ tables before I realized how ****ty the rake was.