Unofficial Petition to Remove The Beast/BBJ Tables From WPN(ACR, BCP, TRUE) - Page 9 - Internet Poker

Two Plus Two Forums Online Poker Sites & Marketplaces Online Poker Sites Discussion of Poker Sites

Unofficial Petition to Remove The Beast/BBJ Tables From WPN(ACR, BCP, TRUE)

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 9 of 12

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Page 9 of 12

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

02-16-2013 , 01:37 AM

#201

bullshark

newbie

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 24

Reading this thread has prevented me from depositing on wpn. The rake is ridiculous.

Quote

02-16-2013 , 01:41 AM

#202

SSBM Hax

newbie

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 27

signed. i literally quit online poker because of this. as a New Yorker, ACR is my only good option but BBJ rake completely ruins it

Quote

02-20-2013 , 11:53 AM

#203

Waffleticket

journeyman

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 210

signed

Quote

02-20-2013 , 03:29 PM

#204

Leiferman

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 286

Quote:

Originally Posted by bullshark

Reading this thread has prevented me from depositing on wpn. The rake is ridiculous.

Quote

02-24-2013 , 08:19 PM

#205

jjmcclain

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 374

Signed

Quote

02-24-2013 , 08:20 PM

#206

fidstar-poker

I'm gonna need a hacksaw

Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 31,787

signed!

Quote

02-25-2013 , 02:37 AM

#207

tehpokerz

banned

Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 16

signed. micro players nightmare

Quote

03-02-2013 , 04:30 PM

#208

huaw1ad

grinder

Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 459

Signed

Quote

03-28-2013 , 09:13 PM

#209

MicroDonky1

banned

Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 427

Looked at this thread a bit and didn't see a direct answer so I thought posting here may help.
How bad is the rake for nanostakes? I'm talking about $.01/.02-$.05/.10

Quote

03-28-2013 , 10:01 PM

#210

Treadwell

grinder

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 623

Signed

MicroDonky1, .01/.02-.02/.05 aren't Beast/BBJ tables so rake is probably comparable to most sites at those limits.

.05/.10 non Beast/BBJ tables run also so same thing but you can play Beast/BBJ tables at that stake where the rake is terribad.

Quote

03-29-2013 , 09:49 AM

#211

MicroDonky1

banned

Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 427

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treadwell

I think it's pretty bad though. I have played on other sites and it doesn't seem like it was as bad, but that's why I was trying to get a number to compare. Maybe there's a thread somewhere containing a good comparison for different stakes I just haven't found it thus far.

But I have sat at the BBJ tables thinking I am due lol, and I agree the rake was tremendously high and something should be done so....

SIGNED

Quote

03-29-2013 , 03:15 PM

#212

scottp4braves

Optimistic

Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 1,087

Signed

Quote

03-29-2013 , 11:44 PM

#213

spew4u

enthusiast

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 80

SIGNED

I'm another who hasn't played since BF. I have recently been trying to decide on a network. I had my mind made up. I was going with Winning... until this thread.

Last edited by spew4u; 03-30-2013 at 12:09 AM.

Quote

03-30-2013 , 01:29 AM

#214

5thStreetHog

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 7,687

I hope everyone who signed this is not playing those tables. That is the only truly effective protest.

Quote

03-30-2013 , 05:17 AM

#215

oneonth3run

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,646

Haven't played cash since January solely because of the rake. It was fine on Merge before the move.

Quote

03-30-2013 , 02:43 PM

#216

tempeh!

journeyman

Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 316

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5thStreetHog

I hope everyone who signed this is not playing those tables. That is the only truly effective protest.

for their own benefit as well...i feel like an idiot after trying to make a run at the beast. read through this thread and stay away!
didn't make even half of what i normally have through that many hands on other sites, and that's after beast payout (1k) and rakeback....plus i was running hot, like super hot for the first 60k hands.

Last edited by tempeh!; 03-30-2013 at 02:48 PM.

Quote

03-30-2013 , 07:25 PM

#217

Waffleticket

journeyman

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 210

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5thStreetHog

I hope everyone who signed this is not playing those tables. That is the only truly effective protest.

Gonna be tough for this to happen when Revolution is trying to lose all their customers.

Quote

03-30-2013 , 09:46 PM

#218

1NTERNETPRON

newbie

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 21

Signed.

Down with the beast.

Quote

03-30-2013 , 09:50 PM

#219

JimAfternoon

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 6,903

I haven't deposited because of the beast rake.

Signed.

Quote

04-14-2013 , 11:49 PM

#220

thr33bet

old hand

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 1,840

signed.

Quote

04-15-2013 , 12:08 AM

#221

blobbloblob

old hand

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1,401

signed

Quote

04-15-2013 , 12:17 AM

#222

otatop

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 12,721

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treadwell

.05/.10 non Beast/BBJ tables run also so same thing but you can play Beast/BBJ tables at that stake where the rake is terribad.

To clarify, I played a BBJ 10NL table because it was basically all that was running, and when the SB limped and I checked my BB, we saw a flop and fought over a $.09 pot. Ridiculous.

Quote

04-15-2013 , 12:29 AM

#223

blobbloblob

old hand

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 1,401

Quote:

Originally Posted by otatop

To clarify, I played a BBJ 10NL table because it was basically all that was running, and when the SB limped and I checked my BB, we saw a flop and fought over a $.09 pot. Ridiculous.

When I'm in the BB and that happens I raise every time just because I can. I'm not sure if that is more -EV than checking.

Quote

04-29-2013 , 09:56 AM

#224

WVUskinsfan

no felonies

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 5,055

Is micro cash even profitable on bbj tables talking 10nl and under?

Just curious

Quote

04-29-2013 , 11:06 AM

#225

three_dee

adept

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 841

Quote:

Originally Posted by WVUskinsfan

Is micro cash even profitable on bbj tables talking 10nl and under?

Just curious

The short answer is, it's possible to be profitable, but not enough to be worth bothering. I had a ~7BB/100 win rate at the 10NL tables that aren't BBJ, and ~2 at the BBJ tables before I realized how ****ty the rake was.

Quote

Page 9 of 12

First

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 9 of 12

First

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Last