Quote:
Originally Posted by DuFisch
Thanks for the answer pokeraddict. I hear what you mean with schemes and all that. - This is also the reason why I never "overdid" anything given the volume I play... but what's all that tagging of affiliates about? Why should it stay that way?
I'm not sure I understand your question but I will answer what I think you're asking.
I suppose you signed up for ewallet rb through this affiliate by using his link. This link is usually for people to place on a website that drives traffic to the ewallet. In exchange, they get paid a referral of x% of revenue produced by you forever.
For ewallets, the amount of money is trivial for most players, but it gives the ewallet exposure where it may otherwise not have any. The reward is paying commission on a player's activity forever.
Your affiliate has decided to violate the spirit of this agreement by offering an under the table deal. This model does not account for this. You feel cheated now that the terms have been changed/breached, but presumably the ewallet never endorsed this agreement you had so they aren't going to go out of their way to help untag you. In other words, this affiliate tricked you into clicking his link so he could make money off you forever and has now decided to make it harder for you to get paid, knowing you will still use the ewallet (I guess, I'm going off what I understand your complaint to be).
Normally, you would have no idea what affiliate you had, if you had one at all. That is because you would not be expecting anything in return.
This is a common scam in rakeback at sites where players are not allowed kickbacks but affiliates offer them illegally. They can simply stop paying and still get paid without any recourse.
I hope that answered your question.