Hey guys, I'm currently developing a paper for one of my university classes, and we've decided to analyse poker communities, learning, playing, etc. I would REALLY! appreciate if you can answer any of these questions, maybe pick one of each section and answer. It doesn't have to be a long answer, a very short one if you have no time! But the more answers the better. Please help a poker buddy out
, it would mean a lot to me, and I only expect a short answer. Plus, I know it can be annoying but I really need it for this subject. Even though some questions might seem of obvious answer, I need to know your opinions about it. By the way, sorry if any of them are badly written, I'm not from an english speaking country (Argentina), and it's 3 am here :P.
THANK YOU!!
QUESTIONS
Communities of practice
Do you feel part of a team when you participate in an online forum regarding poker, when there are people willing to learn?
Do you feel passionate about poker?
Do you feel that you and your poker teammates (meaning other members of your community) share a specific goal they want to achieve, besides winning money? (such as learning, proving themselves what they are capable of, etc? If so, please share your view with us.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learning
How could you describe the importance of learning and studying in poker? Did they improve your game and the way you perceive things?
Do you perceive better results after learning, studying and acquiring knowledge?
Some authors argue that well educated and successful people don’t like failing and admitting they don’t know certain things just because they are used to success. How important do you think admitting that you may be failing and need improvement and training is in poker?
Senge is an author that mentions that growth can be limited by a compensating cycle or limiting factor. Many people in the world of poker agree in that being willing to study, learn, train and review previous hands is crucial to eliminate this limiting factor. Do you agree, or do you think there is something more to it?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mental processes
Has studying and learning poker changed your mental processes in relation to poker, allowing you to play better, or do you think training by playing has done a better job at it?
Maintaining the status quo is easy in the sense that it looking to change could make us suffer from psychological risk. However, being biased and not altering our mental processes could never allow us to learn. How important do you think altering the status quo is to become a good poker player? (changing the way we play, read our opponents, etc).
How important do you think our mind and its mechanisms are for a game involving limited information as is poker? If possible, explain why.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Communication
Communicating is an essential part of the learning process. How important do you think knowing the poker lingo is for adapting to the activity and improving at it?
Paul Watzlawick mentions that ‘not communicating’ is impossible, meaning that not expressing something, even without words, cannot be achieved. Instead, he mentions that there is an analogical aspect apart from a digital one that refers to our body language, tone, and actions. How do you see this reflected at the poker table?
Since we communicate according to the way we play and the style of play we apply, our opponents must make a decision according to this limited information. However, bluffing is always a choice. Thus, how important do you think being able to manipulate what we want to transmit is?
THANKS AGAIN!