well if someone wants to play 6 tables of zoom, who cares? When u played rush, 4 tables was more than enough and when you did +1 tournament aswell. Woawww gtfo brain due to overheat

would be great to 8-10 table rush but if the cap is on 6 tables, grinders would need to add regular games...

yeah, bc 1200-1500 hands an hour is not enough...

maybe 5 people in the whole world will be able to 10table zoom profitable under WC

i aim for 2000 hands per hour

10 hours a day , 20 000 hands , 9000 vpps. 3 000 000 vpps a year, 15 000 000 fpps.

In a few years i can buy a house with fpps

Yeah good luck with that sir.

I think 4-6 tables are the max not by the cap, but thinking in therms of grind, more than it will look as reg tables since you cant play fast enought.

Whoa are we really talking about 4 tables of Rush poker being too slow? I thought my brain was going to explode when I was playing 1 on my android device last year.

omfg few more hours gogog starszzzzz000000000oooooooooooommmmmmmm

no

oui mr garneau

stars wouldnt release after micro millions..

c'est le epic fail

u can play more wc3 again if ur bored of poker or sc2...

just play sonkie or axslav ur old buddies from like 5 yrs ago

Speak for your self bro. 6-8 tables of Zoom is very doable. 4 is yawn, especially at FR. I think it's fair enough if they cap entries per limit, but they should do what Rush did and not have a cap over all stakes...

Also please release at low/mid stakes asap Stars not just Micros!

Its not about do-able.

If it was about that we would be able to play unlimited normal games too.

Theres more than enough people playing 24 tables who can't actually handle it. They're slowing down the games whilst not caring theirselfs.

Zoom Poker is all about fast paced, we cant have those people, which unfortunatly arent a minority, ruin these games aswell.
6-8 Tables is do-able for you, but not to most.

I'm capable of playing 8 rush tables easily too, I would if I could, but I dont agree with it for the above reasons.

However those who want to play more tables will play more tables either way, like adding different limits or table types, so it's impossible to combat anyway.

I don't see what the point of playing that many Zoom tables is. Your tables would constantly be waiting for you to make decisions surely? I would have thought there would be no difference in hands per hour past a certain amount of tables. If you or someone could prove me wrong by posting a utube video i'd be interested to see it or i just don't believe it.

No thats right. The more tables you play the less hands/hr per table will you get. You can think about it as an Logarithm: the more tables you play the less will your hand curve increase till a point where you wont get any extra benefit in adding more tables (the maximum hand point is determined by your clicking speed and thinking time per hand)

o rly

Zoom is online now

you can 24 table with one of these

WHEN

I wanna play, let's go!

GIFSoup

Hurry up PS!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5WrjeB630s

Theres certainly no rush to get this released from PS it seems.

I want zoom.