i also got dis fullstacking chart that i pwn nubs with in 6max



u only need like 1 chart for fullstacking lol

so ez

here's all u need to play postflop fullstackin

http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/game...hand-rankings/

if u can beat top pair bad kicker then bet 3 street or go all in and win

if they suck out then it's just poker baby

"If there weren't luck involved, I would win every time." - Phil Hellmuth, best known for holding a record 11 World Series of Poker bracelets

stefan recently commented that there would be an announcement prior to 2011 fwiw....
then our comments were deleted

i feel like stars is scheming here..

instead of fixing the prob they made it 10x worse.
instead of eradicating ssing - they've nurtured it. and make bank off the rake compared to the 100bb tables.. due to everyone being all in constantly..

and the part that is making me queasy is that they are more popular... due to the amount of star's sser's and the displaced ones from FT who constantly rathole and start tables.. all the while the fish (who doesn't know what a f***ing BB is...) sits down at his unfiltered cash table with his x amount of money drooling on his keyboard.. (fish don't prefer EITHER BTW - these are the ppl that call you down with the nut low b/c they thought you were bluffing)
and then there's the reg.. who has a choice...

either play with 8 regs in a narrowing 100bb player pool.....
or play with the ss army and the mindless fish in this awful awkward game..

stars and the sser's say
"well they're more popular - look at my cool chart - there's more of these tables than those"...



you helped create that appearance.

i know some ppl don't like to think. great. don't. make a CAP game.
i don't have a prob with that.. get SNE playing 1 street poker idc..
but the way it's goin.... it sucks.
games are awful and the player pool is segregated.

40-100
100-250 ftw

if they ever did regulate it in the US and there was an MGM online or Harrah's online..
i would snap move with the current structure.

/rant
hate away

This nonsense comment is the perfect example why this whole thread is a fail.
Fullstackers didnt get what they wanted.
They wanted 30/35/40-100 bb tables all together without splitting the player pools.
This has already been made clear by many posters in this and other threads before the change.
After Pokerstars introduced shallow tables+ 40-100 tables,most fullstackers active in this thread werent happy at all immediately.
Many would probably even prefer the old 20-100 system with no shallow tables to the new one.

so true, cash games have changed so much the last couple of years, the situation not just at pokerstars is pretty ugly, i wonder how things will be in a couple of years

Until Stars is showing up at the fish's house, stealing their debit card, and direct depositing into the Fullstacker's account, the Fullstacker won't be happy.

Neither did the shortstackers. We would like to have EVERY table 20bb, whether thats 20-50bb or 20bb max, wouldn't matter. We didn't want a split player pool either, but we've all had to compromise.

Not at all, I will be happy just to see the back of the rats.

bumping the legendary thread

Did Stars change their site so that they now just direct debit from the U.S. Federal Reserve, and direct deposit into the grinder's accounts?

why not 30bb-100bb all tables?

How about 100bb all the damn time. Death to SHORTSTACKERS.

100bb is pretty short imo. Nothing less than 500bb deep can really be called poker

We already have enough threads on this. Ban bumper and close this one.

looks like the cap game are getting popular at nl100 fr..