Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob999
That's who depechbnkn is....a guy looking to profit every last nickel on anyone here and it matters nothing if he screws you as long as he gets his. He's terrible and now it's confirmed he pm's people trying to grow his affiliate business. No surprise he has no respect for anybody. Charged me 15% for Netspend after steering me to Netspend and saying "ya i have plenty of netspend $100 is fine there and no fee to you ..."....then says I misinterpreted what he said. Everyone knows that Netspend is worse less for all the fees you incur to withdraw/load/being useless for buyins etc...and everyone wants to get rid of it because it's just a click of the mouse to trade. 15% after saying "no fee to you" can't be misinterpreted. I was screwed and just like Vegasbound99 he acted like he was doing me the favor while screwing me. Makes it worse. Never again.
Not defending Depechbnkn. No contact for hours is not cool regardless of circumstance. I do not love him making money each way on a trade either but no one puts a gun to anyone's head and it gives me great piece of mind to know if I need to sell or for that matter buy poker funds quickly, guys like him are around. Plus I trust him.
Reading this netspend thing, it is clear to me that he meant no $5.95 fee to you for buying the moneypak card not no vig. It is how I took it from very first time I read your post about it. For me it is more of a reach to see it how you saw it but you probably could give that message to 20 people and get 10 thinking one way and 10 thinking another.
Knowing Depechbnkn, he never would be saying no vig. Fee is the cost of buying the card, vig is the charge on the money.
You had every right to be pissed for waiting, annoyed for having to send first and pay 15% and put off if you thought he is just arrogant but this netspend thing, is just you not getting what he meant.