Quote:
Originally Posted by theplayer541
off topic but why dont they cut down on the rediculous number of sponsored pros? Most players including me have know idea who half theses people are. The point of having them is to bring new fish in. doesnt exactly work when they are a bunch of nobody's. seems like a great way to cut operating cost and redistribute to the community
I was planning on going for sne for the first time this year and now i have know idea if its worthwhile
Quote:
Originally Posted by wotutalkinabaaat
i also remember steve D saying on the pokercast that the rate of conversions from playmoney to real money was really low.
let stop subsidizing these bums
+1
It kind of seems to me that a ton of the people that are actually influenced enough by pros to create an account are going to end up exactly where they are directed by the advertising in most jurisdictions --> .net.
.net is huge and it doesn't help if with all the advertising out there that's as far as they get. Pick a relative few faces of the site (DN, Isildur, Barry, Moneymaker, Rousso etc) and funnel the rest of those paychecks towards converting players through some sort of play to real money mechanism that's not a sat to a sat to a sat to a freeroll for peanuts.
At best with their current marketing and conversion techniques, they'll drive a few players into the MTT stream, but there is absolutely nothing to convert players to real money cash despite having a **** ton of play cash tables.
I was going to run TST on the play money tables to see just how many there are but after letting it run for 10 minutes, I'm approximately 20% down the lobby with 860 tables and 6740 seats on 6max and FR tables so I would estimate there are probably 4300 tables and 33,700 seats running right now making Stars.net the second or third largest poker room in the world by a mile depending on Zynga (pokerscout has .com at 50,800 cash seats right now).
If you could convert even 5% of those players into .com players every year by redirecting that pro money into conversion programs more efficiently, it would be well worth it. Everyone already thinks Pokerstars when they hear the term online poker. The bigger than ever advertising campaign is kind of overkill when all they do is end up at .net, costing you more by paying a ton of support staff for them as a result.
Real freerolls running around the clock with double digit cash payouts, Playstar FPPs for a 10k chip contribution to the pot trading at $0.001/FPP for a 1000 FPP $1 instant bonus, heck, just giving them a couple dollars each every month to try out 2NL would be better than paying an army of unheard of pros since their conversion methods are admittedly lacking.
It doesn't really help throwing good money after bad when the current method isn't working. It's not like the next lesser known than the rest but better known than the next guy after him is going to actually be the key to making this better. When I started out I was terrified of real money and there's not a chance that I'd even have made it through my first 3 months without uninstalling if I hadn't happened to bink a couple of well paying freerolls on UB and Purple Lounge back in ~'05 where they were running every hour or two, no sat required, and paying in the $10-$20 range with a $30-$40 prizepool.
/play money derail in the SNE thread
Last edited by JH1; 01-30-2012 at 03:23 PM.