Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** ***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes***

12-29-2011 , 03:25 PM
Has anyone made any simulation has to how getting 6 vpps per 1$ affects different multipliers/games in WC vs the previous dealt system or are we just assuming that getting 6 points per 1$ is gonna be enough to compensate the switch? And if so can anyone please point me to where i can check out these calculations. Thx
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMetetrown
I still stand behind this as what a fair outcome for all is and it seems others agree with me.

1. Rake caps of $.50/$1/$1.5/$2/$3 for 2/3/4/5/6+ handed play
2. 4.5% linear rake up to the cap

PLUS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS

3a. Winner take all rake calculation method
4a. 6x VPP across the board

OR

3b. WC rake calculation method
4b. 6.5x VPP across the board


I don't understand the Fixed Limit situation enough to say how much more they are getting screwed, but either lowering the rake a touch to 4% for FL or letting them keep their current incremental system seems fair if they really are getting hurt by 4.5% linear rake.

Stars makes more in this system, high volume players aren't getting too screwed. This outcome is sustainable. Everyone is happy. It's not everything we want, but it is a fair, reasonable solution.

Quote +1 to let Stars know what we want!
+1
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:29 PM
Get back the dealt system..

or

3b. WC rake calculation method
4b. 6.5x VPP across the board
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockpulsar
Has anyone made any simulation has to how getting 6 vpps per 1$ affects different multipliers/games in WC vs the previous dealt system or are we just assuming that getting 6 points per 1$ is gonna be enough to compensate the switch? And if so can anyone please point me to where i can check out these calculations. Thx
Maybe I'm stating the obvious here, but a bump from 5.5vpp to 6 would be almost a 10% increase.

Most players report a 10-15% loss switching to WC.

It's likely that a move to 6vpp wouldn't totally offset the switch, but it would be close enough that it would make the switch "kind of a bummer" instead of "guess it's time to quit poker" for most players who do experience a loss.

As an up side, total whales (the few who would actually gain by a switch to WC) would get the bonus of WC, AND the extra multiplier, keeping them afloat and happy longer.

We promise to grind them down into rake for you stars even if it takes us a bit longer, we really do.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMetetrown
I still stand behind this as what a fair outcome for all is and it seems others agree with me.

1. Rake caps of $.50/$1/$1.5/$2/$3 for 2/3/4/5/6+ handed play
2. 4.5% linear rake up to the cap

PLUS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS

3a. Winner take all rake calculation method
4a. 6x VPP across the board

OR

3b. WC rake calculation method
4b. 6.5x VPP across the board


I don't understand the Fixed Limit situation enough to say how much more they are getting screwed, but either lowering the rake a touch to 4% for FL or letting them keep their current incremental system seems fair if they really are getting hurt by 4.5% linear rake.

Stars makes more in this system, high volume players aren't getting too screwed. This outcome is sustainable. Everyone is happy. It's not everything we want, but it is a fair, reasonable solution.

Quote +1 to let Stars know what we want!

+1
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82
Maybe I'm stating the obvious here, but a bump from 5.5vpp to 6 would be almost a 10% increase.

Most players report a 10-15% loss switching to WC.

It's likely that a move to 6vpp wouldn't totally offset the switch, but it would be close enough that it would make the switch "kind of a bummer" instead of "guess it's time to quit poker" for most players who do experience a loss.

As an up side, total whales (the few who would actually gain by a switch to WC) would get the bonus of WC, AND the extra multiplier, keeping them afloat and happy longer.

We promise to grind them down into rake for you stars even if it takes us a bit longer, we really do.

This is the point. Too many on here want to demand MORE than they had previously and no way are Stars gonna come close to that. People wanna keep it sensible and if we all got this then at least as the above poster said its only "kind of a bummer". Plus stars still make more money than they did before. Happy days for all really.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starvingwriter82
Maybe I'm stating the obvious here, but a bump from 5.5vpp to 6 would be almost a 10% increase.

Most players report a 10-15% loss switching to WC.

It's likely that a move to 6vpp wouldn't totally offset the switch, but it would be close enough that it would make the switch "kind of a bummer" instead of "guess it's time to quit poker" for most players who do experience a loss.

As an up side, total whales (the few who would actually gain by a switch to WC) would get the bonus of WC, AND the extra multiplier, keeping them afloat and happy longer.

We promise to grind them down into rake for you stars even if it takes us a bit longer, we really do.
I'm not sure about that i remenber that when FTP switched to WC over 80% players reported losses in rakeback over 20% and i've seen people in other threads showing that even tho their playing reggish stats their showing alot more than 10-15% losses. I don't see how we can be happy with a 9.1% bump on their part seeing has its still alot less money for the players and alot more for Pokerstars...
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockpulsar
I'm not sure about that i remenber that when FTP switched to WC over 80% players reported losses in rakeback over 20% and i've seen people in other threads showing that even tho their playing reggish stats their showing alot more than 10-15% losses. I don't see how we can be happy with a 9.1% bump on their part seeing has its still alot less money for the players and alot more for Pokerstars...

Thats right. But as it stands getting back 9.1% would be better than the senario we have now. Stars is clearly no longer gonna be giving great deals out, the best we can hope for is to claw back some of the money the regs are gonna lose in 2012.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockpulsar
I'm not sure about that i remenber that when FTP switched to WC over 80% players reported losses in rakeback over 20% and i've seen people in other threads showing that even tho their playing reggish stats their showing alot more than 10-15% losses. I don't see how we can be happy with a 9.1% bump on their part seeing has its still alot less money for the players and alot more for Pokerstars...

CORRECT. WC turned into a huge cash grab for FTP. FTP tried to give players the black card program to offset a little bit of their losses.



WC will be a huge cash grab for Stars. There is nothing given by Stars to try to offset any of the players' losses.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerStars Steve
Thank you all for taking the time to express your opinion about the recently announced changes to ring game rake on PokerStars.com for 2012.

As a direct result of player input, we are cancelling the planned rake changes that were to be implemented in early January 2012. We will still use the incremental method to calculate rake instead of true percentage rake. Rake caps and percentages will remain exactly as they are today.

I would like to add a few comments:

The current rake at PokerStars is the lowest by far among all major poker sites.

We are confident that the planned rake changes would have resulted in a further overall decrease in ring game rake site wide, and a decrease for a majority of players.

There has been much inaccurate information spread about the impact of the changes. As an example, the changes would not have resulted in a 50% increase in rake for 5-handed play. While there would have been an increase in average rake for 5-handed play at NL tables with stakes of $0.25/$0.50 and higher, it would be far less than 50% (for stakes up to $0.10/$0.25 there was either no change or reduction in caps for 5-handed play). Most hands do not reach the cap and thus would not be affected. The rake for many hands dealt to 5 players would actually be lower at many stakes due to the lower rake percentage (4.5% reduced from 5%). If players review rake at other online poker rooms, they will discover that it is the standard for the rake caps to be the same when 5 or more players are dealt into a hand. PokerStars has been the one notable exception to this system.

In summary we still believe that the proposed rake system taken as a whole would result in a more balanced and fair rake system for players. However, given that players have responded so negatively to this change, which also has a cost to PokerStars due to the reduced rake, we felt that the best course of action is to cancel the change.

The change to the Weighted Contributed method of awarding VPPs will remain as announced.
You know, we know that PokerStars is earning billions of dollars. Just quit ur silly bull**** ur boss is telling u. If lowering the rake woulda been a problem I would love to see the dividend ur owners is taking out and your balance sheet.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by brutti
You know, we know that PokerStars is earning billions of dollars. Just quit ur silly bull**** ur boss is telling u. If lowering the rake woulda been a problem I would love to see the dividend ur owners is taking out and your balance sheet.
also being sued for billions of dollars by the US. probably a correlation here.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:47 PM
The changes for Stars.fr players are even more drastic.
Looks like there will be a mass sitout too.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:48 PM
I'm in. hope this works
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrickyTree
This is the point. Too many on here want to demand MORE than they had previously and no way are Stars gonna come close to that. People wanna keep it sensible and if we all got this then at least as the above poster said its only "kind of a bummer". Plus stars still make more money than they did before. Happy days for all really.
I don't see anyone asking for more, i see people asking for 6.5 and 6 points per $, and if what the other poster said before about an increase from 5.5 to 6 being something close to a direct 9.1% bump for players and remenbering the thread that compared FTP/PS RB when FTP changed to WC they showed a 23% overall loss for players then 6.5 points per $ is alot ****ing fairer for the players especially taking into account the horrendous maner in which Pokerstars treated this subject and their most loyal costumers these last few days. Don't be surprised if pokerstars comes along agreeing to the 6x like their making a big concession like they just did with the rake changes and just then people notice they still got shafted for a change that never should have happened in the first place.

Oh yeah and 6.5 would STILL show a profit for pokerstars.

Last edited by Shockpulsar; 12-29-2011 at 03:50 PM. Reason: Forgot smt
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 03:57 PM
There was bound to be a backlash,only time will tell what implications this has.
I for one think stars will have a contingency plan in place,6.5x multiplier or something to that effect.

I have just received a 100% reload from party and someone from 888 phoned me a few hours ago with a tempting offer. I will however remain at stars because stt's are my game,although I do play cash at the end of the month sometimes to keep my vip status.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadbreathWeapon
CORRECT. WC turned into a huge cash grab for FTP. FTP tried to give players the black card program to offset a little bit of their losses.

WC will be a huge cash grab for Stars. There is nothing given by Stars to try to offset any of the players' losses.
The greed and stupidity boggle the mind. Having a billion dollar monopoly isn't enough, I guess.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by User_Name
also being sued for billions of dollars by the US. probably a correlation here.
According to some credible posters, that's just a random high number they throw out there. They have no intention of getting anywhere near that from Stars.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:03 PM
From the changes thread :

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMetetrown
I still stand behind this as what a fair outcome for all is and it seems others agree with me.

1. Rake caps of $.50/$1/$1.5/$2/$3 for 2/3/4/5/6+ handed play
2. 4.5% linear rake up to the cap

PLUS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS

3a. Winner take all rake calculation method
4a. 6x VPP across the board

OR

3b. WC rake calculation method
4b. 6.5x VPP across the board


I don't understand the Fixed Limit situation enough to say how much more they are getting screwed, but either lowering the rake a touch to 4% for FL or letting them keep their current incremental system seems fair if they really are getting hurt by 4.5% linear rake.

Stars makes more in this system, high volume players aren't getting too screwed. This outcome is sustainable. Everyone is happy. It's not everything we want, but it is a fair, reasonable solution.

Quote +1 to let Stars know what we want!
I also think OP needs to be edited with this + reasons we are not happy with stars respone. Also another thread for our stance and date/time of sitout + steve might be good for new players who are just discovering this and not going over the whole thing.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:10 PM
I love that weighted contributed will hurt the shortrats so much, but hate that stars is reducing everyones rakeback and sweeping the difference into their pockets. If they would just raise the VPP multiplier this would be a great move
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:16 PM
yeah I changed my mind. read steve's reply without having had enough coffee.
IN for the mass sitout, unless:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMetetrown
I still stand behind this as what a fair outcome for all is and it seems others agree with me.

1. Rake caps of $.50/$1/$1.5/$2/$3 for 2/3/4/5/6+ handed play
2. 4.5% linear rake up to the cap

PLUS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING TWO OPTIONS

3a. Winner take all rake calculation method
4a. 6x VPP across the board

OR

3b. WC rake calculation method
4b. 6.5x VPP across the board


I don't understand the Fixed Limit situation enough to say how much more they are getting screwed, but either lowering the rake a touch to 4% for FL or letting them keep their current incremental system seems fair if they really are getting hurt by 4.5% linear rake.

Stars makes more in this system, high volume players aren't getting too screwed. This outcome is sustainable. Everyone is happy. It's not everything we want, but it is a fair, reasonable solution.

Quote +1 to let Stars know what we want!
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:17 PM
Still in, and +100 for TheMetetrown's post. This is ridiculous.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:18 PM
Still in.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:18 PM
Count me innnnn
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:21 PM
anyone seen the tweet from daniel negreanu and then pokerstars retweeted what he wrote.

literally LOL'd
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote
12-29-2011 , 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockpulsar
I don't see anyone asking for more, i see people asking for 6.5 and 6 points per $, and if what the other poster said before about an increase from 5.5 to 6 being something close to a direct 9.1% bump for players and remenbering the thread that compared FTP/PS RB when FTP changed to WC they showed a 23% overall loss for players then 6.5 points per $ is alot ****ing fairer for the players especially taking into account the horrendous maner in which Pokerstars treated this subject and their most loyal costumers these last few days. Don't be surprised if pokerstars comes along agreeing to the 6x like their making a big concession like they just did with the rake changes and just then people notice they still got shafted for a change that never should have happened in the first place.

Oh yeah and 6.5 would STILL show a profit for pokerstars.

Fair enough if thats the case 6.5x it should be. But there are people on here clamouring for 7x VPP multiplier plus reduced rake etc etc. They simply aint gonna get it. Stars management are only gonna listen if the regs on here come up with realistic options.
***Mass Sitout to Protest PokerStars 2012 Rake Changes*** Quote

      
m