This has nothing to do with new signups.

yea not yet anyways.
Honestly their are bunch sites ppl can play @ why would you choose one that doesn't payout players based on retroactive unachievable policies.
you realize 2500FFP is stealing my money along with the others but its ok because new signups wont be forced to go thru that. Neither did i at first and theirs no promise they wont retroactively do that same **** they did to us. If they can flip the script on us they can flip it on whoever they want too.

39suited please explain to me how 2500 FFP requirement with 1k cashout per week with 8k balance and being a winning player isnt stealing my money? you cant. bottom line is the site refuses to payout the players with the largest balances of which they tookover. It looks better because they hide to stiffin behind unreachable exit strategy which you dont seem to SEE. The goal is unachievable and every old player with money still left on the site has been effectively stiffed but its ok we got ****ed right as long as you dont get ****ed right?

Point is they are being cheap and petty. Its all bull**** man, they have the money to pay us out they just dont want too.

+1

As a US midstakes grinder, I'm always looking for more action when I can only play 4 (juicy) tables at Bovada, than with all the other regs on WPN.

1k max withdrawal w/fees and no free cash outs just isn't enough to entice me to play here. Couple that with the fact that there seems to be a real chance of me not getting paid if I spin up a 6 figure bankroll, makes me very apprehensive to deposit here.

Even realistically, if i were to win $10,000 the idea of waiting 10 weeks and paying a fee every single week just sounds bleh.

It's kind of hard to have any sympathy for you when you are actively trying to destroy the site that owes you 8k. I think that it would be easy to spot you on a lifeboat; you'd be the guy with the power drill.

They arnt going to pay me out anyways man its been a long time and they continue to decline every withdrawal request.

dont insult me because i am warning other people how i am being treated.
I take it your the type of person that would try to get more ppl to signup to lock poker in order to further the ponzi scheme in hopes of getting your money out. Im not keeping my mouth shut on this. They ****ed me and thats my story. New signups take it as they may.

Actually I was one of the first people warning players against Lock. Even well before the payments stopped some of us could see that something was wrong there. Juicy is the exact opposite of a Ponzi scheme. They are paying players off with money out of their own pocket.

If you contributed your play to the site they would pay you.

Any word on bitcoin deposits/withdraws?

This is what cracks me up you people dont see thru the fog. Do the math man for the required 2500! FFP. you realize they only charged 100ffp to get a free withdrawal. so they wanna charge us 25x that

Example is for hu:
2500FFP=5k rake taken when im at table, raking that much a week which would be nearly impossible given traffic. Even then if i did that i would get 36% in rb which would be 1800/2 would be 900 in rb. i can only get out 1k week. so im actually adding to the problem including winnings. i have zero issue with playing but 2500ffp is stiffin me and the other winning players.

lol at wanting me to generate 40k in rake to get my 8k already owed to me which i already generated rake for during my account runup. i have contributed more in rake overall to networks lifespan than almost everyone in here so please STFU ppl about playing and yes i understanding different "owners". yea intertops didn't benefit at all besides the fact i have an intertops account also and generated lots of rake their over the years along with liquidity i provided on my cake/juicy stakes SN's to let their customers have someone to play to put rake in their pocket.

What you don't seem to realize is that you have 8k that you can use to win money that you can take off the site that you otherwise wouldn't have had if the current owners of Juicy hadn't given it to you.

If the lack of traffic is making it difficult for you to accumulate the amount of points needed to withdraw your 8k then it seems like the dumbest thing in the world that you could do is to try to further reduce that traffic.

Is it just the 8k that is limited to 1k/week or all future withdrawals? Makes a big difference.

Hello.

I would like to know as a high stakes player does this $100 withdrawal fee apply to new account?

I have never had a account at juicy stakes, But if deposited $10,000 and I started playing all the regs sitting at 10/20 ( assuming they are not all bumhunters ) and win $10,000 do I also have to go through this 2,500 FPPs weekly rate in order to cash out or does this just apply to Old juicy stakes account.

Thanks Matt

the 1k/week max cashout is for everyone. They capped withdrawals to 1k week, so if you won 5k you would have to wait 5 weeks with no play to get it all, #LOOL

Jackpot they wont make you generate the 2500 FFP at first of course. but if you did win 10k have fun waiting 2.5 months to get it,BUT oh wait they might get pissy like they did with me that your not playing LOOL and asking for a max withdrawal everyweek. then hit you with the 2500FFP

This is in contradiction to:

No it's not. He obviously wasn't saying that players could withdraw infinite amounts of their bankrolls. He was simply saying that points don't have to be earned for post takeover winnings at Juicy.

All sites have some sort of limitations on the amounts of money that can be withdrawn over a period of time. 4k a month is certainly more than players can withdraw on a couple of the other US sites. Even well before the recent Merge slowdown, it has been virtually impossible to withdraw that much money per month for most of their players.

I can withdraw $10,000 on WPN at one time to my ewallet and receive ewallet withdrawals usually within 2 business days(they use a different Skrill/Neteller payment processor like Merge do).

How can a restricted 1k/week max cashout for everyone = full access to them at any time

1k/week sounds good compared to Merge, but this was not the point.

Are you actually from the US or ROW? Because if e latter is the case, it is more or less irrelevant to mention how much money you can withdraw at once compared to US players.

The highest games running more or less are 100 or 200. Occasionally higher, possibly more likely during weekends but i wouldnt know. The 50 action is usually there, 20 nlh also runs, and plo20 just possibly, the rake being heavy there.

You're missing the point as to what the rep meant by full access. Even $10,000 at a time isn't full access according to your interpretation. Again, he was simply making the point that points don't have to be earned for money won after the takeover. In criticizing the rep's statement, you're just knocking down your own strawman.

The word points is not in his statement. If his statement is in relation to points, the word points should be in his statement.

No. That quote was a direct response to a question that I had asked. I specifically asked if the money earned after the takeover was also restricted. I was referring to the points therefore his statement was obviously in relation to the points. He didn't need to say points in his response because it was a given that points were what we were talking about. You're simply taking what he said out of context and pasting your own meaning on it.

In your post is as well nothing mentioned about points:

As I would be a new player, I have only interest in what is valid post takeover and his statement that I have full access to my balance at any time is obviously not the case.

New players have nothing to do with the restrictions of the blackmailing guy that wants his last 8k without play. Are you from the US or ROW?