Quote:
Originally Posted by MR_UNOWEN
Ok, but do you still feel ok about Hero and the us market? Let me ask it slightly differently. Should I feel as comfortable about continuing to be able to play on Hero as I would have felt a month ago, 6 months ago, a year ago? It would be very disappointing not to be able to play anymore, so I want to keep on top of things as much as possible.
Okay, what I'm going to write here is through the eyes of an industry executive and not as player, so it may seem a bit abstract, but I reckon it is the same mental framework that dictates a lot of what is going on.
Actually really nothing has changed in terms of the real overall framework, it has been the same since 2006. So all the action against the processors has been in this framework. While there have been some very dramatic events (understatement), this hasn't changed the actual framework for better or worse. Hero is in the same industry environment as it was 6 months, 1 year and even when I was at Stars, 3 years ago.
I think a lot of the confusion is whether or not the recent issue is aimed at the processor then to the network OR the issue was simultaneously address to both the processor and the network OR only to the processor, but the network had to engage it because of player fund issues. I'm not going to speculate on which one it could be or why, but the main point is, that fundamentally it isn't different to what has happened since 2006 in that the action begins with the processor. But of course with all the recent events, it is disconcerting (understatement), but in an industry's view point, nothing really has changed. From a player's perspective, perception will change based on whatever news occurs, but the underlying framework hasn't changed.
Of course I'm not getting into the implications of the framework as that is something that some firms understand more than others and it is a complex environment that needs to be constantly managed. At this point, I think that most players are 10 times more educated about the industry and the process than they were 1 year ago and so I think it is extremely good for the industry in that, 1. most players will get the gist of what I'm saying now, opposed to 1 year ago when it wouldn't have made sense at all, and 2. if a site comes out with a press release about this and that, most players can take a critical eye to it and from what I've read, there are some really spot on points players are making. I'd say the industry is growing up very very fast.
Quote:
Originally Posted by crzbrave
Hello, I gotta say the site is awesome and it is great to have you posting on here answering your player inquiries. I requested my first withdrawal February 1st, know it will take a couple more weeks.
I have some suggestions and worries about the 5 $ NLH Golden Apples Arena freeroll. I have played several of these tournaments, and I am happy to have holdem freerolls along side the classic Omaha ones. But the format is just not working at all, you start with 3500 chips and blinds are 10 minutes. What ends up happening is 6 or more people sit out for majority of game, it is quite boring and ruins the game battling it out with 1 or 2 players while 6 others are sitting out. Maybe reduce the starting chip stack, speed up blind levels? I have emailed these suggestions to support and they said they would be passed along to Management, had I known of this thread sooner I would have came straight here to the boss. Could you please take a look into this to somehow fix these tournaments to make them more enjoyable for your players and hopefully eliminate the sitouts. Thanks Dave for the great site and all the work you do for us, it is greatly appreciated.
Ok, I hate when people sit out, so I'll get this sorted within this week with some changes! Goes against the entire reason why these are set up.
Cheers,
Dave